Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump needs to start- rightly- calling Schumer the senator from the Mexican states.

People are catching on to the unholy leftis alliance.

Schumer is standing for what his US citizen constituents want — 1) DACA compromise, 2) not to pay for a useless wall.

Wasn’t Mexico supposed to pay for the wall?

Working class Americans don’t want 80 dollar/day illegal labor. You do for your mansion. Go visit the fire halls in small town USA. You are an elitist like Schumer.

DP... The hundreds of thousands of American businesses that keep employing them obviously still want them. Need to acknowledge that and sort that out somehow.

Sorry, I don’t care about business that take advantage of this black market. MAGA

You are talking about farmers and small businesses all throughout the heartland. Seems you are the elitist who hates the heartland now.

Well, I am married to a hispanic, so I don't feel badly about the "brown person" stuff. And I grew up on and still own a farm so that elitist stuff doesn't tag me.

And I think Trump is a big hypocrite, so that doesn't rattle me either. I just want the border secured and illegal immigration stopped. Legal immigration -- especially merit based -- is great! Then, for me, MAGA is complete.

Better tell your hispanic spouse to carry proof of citizenship. ICE is out there asking for it.

She doesn't realize the MAGA crowd doesn't differentiate between "good" Hispanics like her husband and criminals who should be deported. They hate them all equally because they're brown.

Gee, that's funny. All the conservatives I know want illegal immigration curbed because we have plenty of brown people that are already citizens (brought here through slavery I might add) that are living in poverty. We conservatives feel their plight is much more important that illegal immigrants. But you already have American brown people votes, so it's best to keep them in poverty, make promises you don't intend to keep, and give money that can help them to those that have deliberately broken immigration laws.

Liberals don't care about brown people. They care about votes.

Gee, that's funny... your R party is so worried about the descendants of slaves who live in poverty that they want to take away healthcare and food programs from them because you think you know what's best for them. This is like white slave owners all over again thinking they know better than those black folks. I mean.. might as well say life was better for them when they were slaves.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve come to the conclusion that it was a brilliant move by the Republicans to put CHIP in the chopping block. I don’t think they were ever really going to defund it, but now the dems has to fight for it. It turned into some liberal pet entitlement program as opposed to the bipartisan support it typically received. And now the Dems had a choice-fight for CHIP OR DACA, or go for both and risk looking greedy. Seriously, whoever came up with this idea should get a pay raise.

Looks like you love the terrorists who would take elderly and kids hostage and ask you to chose between the the two groups to save along with the ransom.

Not sure where the elderly enters into the debate, but I thought the Rs agreed to fund CHIP for six years.

Also, why not abolish CHIP and migrate those kids to Medicaid? Time for government to learn the word "efficiency"'and stop with overlapping programs.

I guess you do not know what analogy is. Let me explain slowly

Terrorists == GOP
DACA == eledrly
CHIP == kids
CR approval on GOP's terms only == Ransom

Are you being sarcastic? You're drawing a comparison between the elderly and illegal immigrants?

Elderly: Legal American citizens who have contributed to this country by working and paying taxes for 60 years.

DACA Young Adults: People who were snuck in illegally by their parents, and whom Americans educated for K-12, and of whom 20% stuck their nose up at the gift and dropped out of high school.

As far as the GOP being terrorists, too ridiculous to even address.

You certainly missed the "analogy" lessons.

Here is the thing, both DACA and CHIP are programs for vulnerables. GOP is acting like terrorists taking two sets of vulnerables hostage and asking Democrats to chose between the two while agreeing to GOP agenda. That is reprehensible. GOP has created this CHIP or DACA situation. Democrats law makers want to protect the vulnerables and they should not be chosing one over the other.

No matter how many times you saw, DACA recipients are not illegal immigrants, they are victims and pawns in GOPs anti-nonwhite agenda.

So now CHIP and DACA are equivalent in your liberal mind?

CHIP: Vulnenable and poor CHILDREN of American citizens
DACA: Young ADULTS of illegal immigrants who snuck them into the country and who are thus entitled to nothing, yet scream profane-laced demands at a senior member of Cingress

False equivalency, BIGLY.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve come to the conclusion that it was a brilliant move by the Republicans to put CHIP in the chopping block. I don’t think they were ever really going to defund it, but now the dems has to fight for it. It turned into some liberal pet entitlement program as opposed to the bipartisan support it typically received. And now the Dems had a choice-fight for CHIP OR DACA, or go for both and risk looking greedy. Seriously, whoever came up with this idea should get a pay raise.

Looks like you love the terrorists who would take elderly and kids hostage and ask you to chose between the the two groups to save along with the ransom.

Not sure where the elderly enters into the debate, but I thought the Rs agreed to fund CHIP for six years.

Also, why not abolish CHIP and migrate those kids to Medicaid? Time for government to learn the word "efficiency"'and stop with overlapping programs.

I guess you do not know what analogy is. Let me explain slowly

Terrorists == GOP
DACA == eledrly
CHIP == kids
CR approval on GOP's terms only == Ransom

Are you being sarcastic? You're drawing a comparison between the elderly and illegal immigrants?

Elderly: Legal American citizens who have contributed to this country by working and paying taxes for 60 years.

DACA Young Adults: People who were snuck in illegally by their parents, and whom Americans educated for K-12, and of whom 20% stuck their nose up at the gift and dropped out of high school.

As far as the GOP being terrorists, too ridiculous to even address.

You certainly missed the "analogy" lessons.

Here is the thing, both DACA and CHIP are programs for vulnerables. GOP is acting like terrorists taking two sets of vulnerables hostage and asking Democrats to chose between the two while agreeing to GOP agenda. That is reprehensible. GOP has created this CHIP or DACA situation. Democrats law makers want to protect the vulnerables and they should not be chosing one over the other.

No matter how many times you saw, DACA recipients are not illegal immigrants, they are victims and pawns in GOPs anti-nonwhite agenda.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump needs to start- rightly- calling Schumer the senator from the Mexican states.

People are catching on to the unholy leftis alliance.

Schumer is standing for what his US citizen constituents want — 1) DACA compromise, 2) not to pay for a useless wall.

Wasn’t Mexico supposed to pay for the wall?

Working class Americans don’t want 80 dollar/day illegal labor. You do for your mansion. Go visit the fire halls in small town USA. You are an elitist like Schumer.

DP... The hundreds of thousands of American businesses that keep employing them obviously still want them. Need to acknowledge that and sort that out somehow.

Sorry, I don’t care about business that take advantage of this black market. MAGA

You are talking about farmers and small businesses all throughout the heartland. Seems you are the elitist who hates the heartland now.

Well, I am married to a hispanic, so I don't feel badly about the "brown person" stuff. And I grew up on and still own a farm so that elitist stuff doesn't tag me.

And I think Trump is a big hypocrite, so that doesn't rattle me either. I just want the border secured and illegal immigration stopped. Legal immigration -- especially merit based -- is great! Then, for me, MAGA is complete.

Better tell your hispanic spouse to carry proof of citizenship. ICE is out there asking for it.

She doesn't realize the MAGA crowd doesn't differentiate between "good" Hispanics like her husband and criminals who should be deported. They hate them all equally because they're brown.

Gee, that's funny. All the conservatives I know want illegal immigration curbed because we have plenty of brown people that are already citizens (brought here through slavery I might add) that are living in poverty. We conservatives feel their plight is much more important that illegal immigrants. But you already have American brown people votes, so it's best to keep them in poverty, make promises you don't intend to keep, and give money that can help them to those that have deliberately broken immigration laws.

Liberals don't care about brown people. They care about votes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve come to the conclusion that it was a brilliant move by the Republicans to put CHIP in the chopping block. I don’t think they were ever really going to defund it, but now the dems has to fight for it. It turned into some liberal pet entitlement program as opposed to the bipartisan support it typically received. And now the Dems had a choice-fight for CHIP OR DACA, or go for both and risk looking greedy. Seriously, whoever came up with this idea should get a pay raise.

Looks like you love the terrorists who would take elderly and kids hostage and ask you to chose between the the two groups to save along with the ransom.

Not sure where the elderly enters into the debate, but I thought the Rs agreed to fund CHIP for six years.

Also, why not abolish CHIP and migrate those kids to Medicaid? Time for government to learn the word "efficiency"'and stop with overlapping programs.

np: There's not much that overlaps about kids' and the elderly's health care.

LOL. time for PP to learn the difference between Medicaid and Medicare.

Medicaid = health care for poor people
Medicare = health care for old people

Anonymous wrote:Schumer isn’t being held hostage by his far left base. He overplayed his hand. He did this.

This isn’t playing the way Schumer hoped. Democrats have been screaming about us being on the brink of war and they shut down the government. “If people who have been here for decades illegally can’t become legal, we’ll put the entire nation at risk for nuclear anniliation we have been waving our arms about for month.”

“They go - we all go America.”

Is that your campaign ad?

Is that what the commentators at the opening of the Olympic ceremonies in 2 short weeks will say? Democrats in America are holding the world’s safety hostage for illegal immigrants.

Good luck with that messaging. You are going to need it. I’m not wrong.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve come to the conclusion that it was a brilliant move by the Republicans to put CHIP in the chopping block. I don’t think they were ever really going to defund it, but now the dems has to fight for it. It turned into some liberal pet entitlement program as opposed to the bipartisan support it typically received. And now the Dems had a choice-fight for CHIP OR DACA, or go for both and risk looking greedy. Seriously, whoever came up with this idea should get a pay raise.

Looks like you love the terrorists who would take elderly and kids hostage and ask you to chose between the the two groups to save along with the ransom.

Not sure where the elderly enters into the debate, but I thought the Rs agreed to fund CHIP for six years.

Also, why not abolish CHIP and migrate those kids to Medicaid? Time for government to learn the word "efficiency"'and stop with overlapping programs.

I guess you do not know what analogy is. Let me explain slowly

Terrorists == GOP
DACA == eledrly
CHIP == kids
CR approval on GOP's terms only == Ransom

Are you being sarcastic? You're drawing a comparison between the elderly and illegal immigrants?

Elderly: Legal American citizens who have contributed to this country by working and paying taxes for 60 years.

DACA Young Adults: People who were snuck in illegally by their parents, and whom Americans educated for K-12, and of whom 20% stuck their nose up at the gift and dropped out of high school.

As far as the GOP being terrorists, too ridiculous to even address.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve come to the conclusion that it was a brilliant move by the Republicans to put CHIP in the chopping block. I don’t think they were ever really going to defund it, but now the dems has to fight for it. It turned into some liberal pet entitlement program as opposed to the bipartisan support it typically received. And now the Dems had a choice-fight for CHIP OR DACA, or go for both and risk looking greedy. Seriously, whoever came up with this idea should get a pay raise.

Looks like you love the terrorists who would take elderly and kids hostage and ask you to chose between the the two groups to save along with the ransom.

Not sure where the elderly enters into the debate, but I thought the Rs agreed to fund CHIP for six years.

Also, why not abolish CHIP and migrate those kids to Medicaid? Time for government to learn the word "efficiency"'and stop with overlapping programs.

I guess you do not know what analogy is. Let me explain slowly

Terrorists == GOP
DACA == eledrly
CHIP == kids
CR approval on GOP's terms only == Ransom

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve come to the conclusion that it was a brilliant move by the Republicans to put CHIP in the chopping block. I don’t think they were ever really going to defund it, but now the dems has to fight for it. It turned into some liberal pet entitlement program as opposed to the bipartisan support it typically received. And now the Dems had a choice-fight for CHIP OR DACA, or go for both and risk looking greedy. Seriously, whoever came up with this idea should get a pay raise.

Looks like you love the terrorists who would take elderly and kids hostage and ask you to chose between the the two groups to save along with the ransom.

Not sure where the elderly enters into the debate, but I thought the Rs agreed to fund CHIP for six years.

Also, why not abolish CHIP and migrate those kids to Medicaid? Time for government to learn the word "efficiency"'and stop with overlapping programs.

np: There's not much that overlaps about kids' and the elderly's health care.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve come to the conclusion that it was a brilliant move by the Republicans to put CHIP in the chopping block. I don’t think they were ever really going to defund it, but now the dems has to fight for it. It turned into some liberal pet entitlement program as opposed to the bipartisan support it typically received. And now the Dems had a choice-fight for CHIP OR DACA, or go for both and risk looking greedy. Seriously, whoever came up with this idea should get a pay raise.

Looks like you love the terrorists who would take elderly and kids hostage and ask you to chose between the the two groups to save along with the ransom.

Not sure where the elderly enters into the debate, but I thought the Rs agreed to fund CHIP for six years.

Also, why not abolish CHIP and migrate those kids to Medicaid? Time for government to learn the word "efficiency"'and stop with overlapping programs.

np: There's not much that overlaps about kids' and the elderly's health care.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve come to the conclusion that it was a brilliant move by the Republicans to put CHIP in the chopping block. I don’t think they were ever really going to defund it, but now the dems has to fight for it. It turned into some liberal pet entitlement program as opposed to the bipartisan support it typically received. And now the Dems had a choice-fight for CHIP OR DACA, or go for both and risk looking greedy. Seriously, whoever came up with this idea should get a pay raise.

Looks like you love the terrorists who would take elderly and kids hostage and ask you to chose between the the two groups to save along with the ransom.

Not sure where the elderly enters into the debate, but I thought the Rs agreed to fund CHIP for six years.

Also, why not abolish CHIP and migrate those kids to Medicaid? Time for government to learn the word "efficiency"'and stop with overlapping programs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve come to the conclusion that it was a brilliant move by the Republicans to put CHIP in the chopping block. I don’t think they were ever really going to defund it, but now the dems has to fight for it. It turned into some liberal pet entitlement program as opposed to the bipartisan support it typically received. And now the Dems had a choice-fight for CHIP OR DACA, or go for both and risk looking greedy. Seriously, whoever came up with this idea should get a pay raise.

Looks like you love the terrorists who would take elderly and kids hostage and ask you to chose between the the two groups to save along with the ransom.

Not sure where the elderly enters into the debate, but I thought the Rs agreed to fund CHIP for six years.

Also, why not abolish CHIP and migrate those kids to Medicaid? Time for government to learn the word "efficiency"'and stop with overlapping programs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump needs to start- rightly- calling Schumer the senator from the Mexican states.

People are catching on to the unholy leftis alliance.

Schumer is standing for what his US citizen constituents want — 1) DACA compromise, 2) not to pay for a useless wall.

Wasn’t Mexico supposed to pay for the wall?

Working class Americans don’t want 80 dollar/day illegal labor. You do for your mansion. Go visit the fire halls in small town USA. You are an elitist like Schumer.

DP... The hundreds of thousands of American businesses that keep employing them obviously still want them. Need to acknowledge that and sort that out somehow.

Sorry, I don’t care about business that take advantage of this black market. MAGA

You are talking about farmers and small businesses all throughout the heartland. Seems you are the elitist who hates the heartland now.

Well, I am married to a hispanic, so I don't feel badly about the "brown person" stuff. And I grew up on and still own a farm so that elitist stuff doesn't tag me.

And I think Trump is a big hypocrite, so that doesn't rattle me either. I just want the border secured and illegal immigration stopped. Legal immigration -- especially merit based -- is great! Then, for me, MAGA is complete.

Better tell your hispanic spouse to carry proof of citizenship. ICE is out there asking for it.

She doesn't realize the MAGA crowd doesn't differentiate between "good" Hispanics like her husband and criminals who should be deported. They hate them all equally because they're brown.

Gee, that's funny. All the conservatives I know want illegal immigration curbed because we have plenty of brown people that are already citizens (brought here through slavery I might add) that are living in poverty. We conservatives feel their plight is much more important that illegal immigrants. But you already have American brown people votes, so it's best to keep them in poverty, make promises you don't intend to keep, and give money that can help them to those that have deliberately broken immigration laws.

Liberals don't care about brown people. They care about votes.