Well - there's this.

Putin Loyalists Are Invading Washington - Bloomberg
https://apple.news/ARxRQ0TKaTo68PBMvK5BLJQ

Anonymous wrote:It's been a quiet day or two about our Russian-selected president and cronies. Any idea what's dropping next?

Well...I will add a thought...
It was announced last week that Breitbart and Infowars are under investigation - Russian Bots.
Today...Bannon is no longer on NSC. Coincidence?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/fbi-breitbart-investigate-alt-right-wing-websites-fake-news-bots-donald-trump-a7641826.html

It's been a quiet day or two about our Russian-selected president and cronies. Any idea what's dropping next?

Anonymous wrote:I remain amazed at the GOP regarding all of this: the multiple levels of Russian contacts and interference, the consistent refusal on the part of Trump with respect to financial transparency, the installation of his daughter and SIL as White House advisors. Just all of it.

This. Is. Not. Normal.

George W. was normal. Mitt Romney was normal. John McCain was normal.

In fact, even Dick Cheney is looking like Thomas 'effin Jefferson right about now.

Agree - not normal!!

I remain amazed at the GOP regarding all of this: the multiple levels of Russian contacts and interference, the consistent refusal on the part of Trump with respect to financial transparency, the installation of his daughter and SIL as White House advisors. Just all of it.

This. Is. Not. Normal.

George W. was normal. Mitt Romney was normal. John McCain was normal.

In fact, even Dick Cheney is looking like Thomas 'effin Jefferson right about now.

Flynn flipped

Sessions recused

Carter met spy

Mercenary as secret back channel

FBI investigation

Dead diplomats


Trump: "It's fake news"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Game, Set, Match

https://patribotics.blog/2017/04/01/alfa-bank-trump-tower-and-a-social-media-impeachment/

I would guess the FBI has this and we are waiting to nail down the details.

Fascinating theory. Thanks.

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know, it was weird how right before the election there was that article in Slate about the weird Trump server talking to a Russian bank and the FBI said it was nothing, nope, nothing to see here.

So you think the FBI should have said, "Yes we secured a FISA warrant for that server and are in the process of investigating state crimes against the Presidential candidate of the United States" before they had the evidence they have today?

It still kind of beggars belief that they reported on HILLARIEZEMAILZ again but were tight lipped about Trump.

Seriously!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know, it was weird how right before the election there was that article in Slate about the weird Trump server talking to a Russian bank and the FBI said it was nothing, nope, nothing to see here.

So you think the FBI should have said, "Yes we secured a FISA warrant for that server and are in the process of investigating state crimes against the Presidential candidate of the United States" before they had the evidence they have today?

It still kind of beggars belief that they reported on HILLARIEZEMAILZ again but were tight lipped about Trump.

Anonymous wrote:You know, it was weird how right before the election there was that article in Slate about the weird Trump server talking to a Russian bank and the FBI said it was nothing, nope, nothing to see here.

So you think the FBI should have said, "Yes we secured a FISA warrant for that server and are in the process of investigating state crimes against the Presidential candidate of the United States" before they had the evidence they have today?

You know, it was weird how right before the election there was that article in Slate about the weird Trump server talking to a Russian bank and the FBI said it was nothing, nope, nothing to see here.

Anonymous wrote:Game, Set, Match

https://patribotics.blog/2017/04/01/alfa-bank-trump-tower-and-a-social-media-impeachment/

I would guess the FBI has this and we are waiting to nail down the details.

Fascinating theory. Thanks.

Game, Set, Match

https://patribotics.blog/2017/04/01/alfa-bank-trump-tower-and-a-social-media-impeachment/

I would guess the FBI has this and we are waiting to nail down the details.

Trump consigliere Roger Stone was in contact with hacker Guccifer 2.0 multiple times in August and September. From last night's CBS Evening News:

ANTHONY MASON (GUEST HOST): The F.B.I. Is investigating whether the Trump campaign had improper contacts with Russians who wanted to meddle in the presidential election. Earlier this month, Roger Stone, a friend and former adviser to Mr. Trump, told our Jeff Pegues he had no contact with Russian hackers, including the mysterious Guccifer 2.0. But Stone's story has changed.

ROGER STONE: There is no collusion here.

JEFF PEGUES: Despite that claim, Roger Stone now admits that he was in contact with Guccifer 2.0, at least 16 times during the 2016 campaign. That Twitter handle released hacked information believed to be stolen from Democratic Party servers. It targeted Hillary Clinton and Democratic candidates in at least six states.

STONE: At the time I had my one and only communications with him --

PEGUES: You had more than just one contact with this person. You had. one two, at least three, between August 12 and September 9.

STONE: Right. I-- I would refer to it as an exchange.

PEGUES: That exchange appears to have started after Guccifer's first account was suspended, and then reactivated in mid-August. "Delighted you are reinstated," Stone wrote. Guccifer responded, "Do you find anything interesting in the docs I posted? A day later, according to these texts confirmed by Stone he asked Guccifer to retweet an article Stone had written. "Please retweet how the election can be rigged against Donald Trump." Guccifer replied, done." And later on the same day, "Please tell me if I can help you anyhow." Earlier this year, U.S. intelligence concluded that Guccifer's sites were a front for Russian military intelligence.

In a way, you're encouraging them to release more information.

STONE: Yeah, that's called networking. Remember, I have no idea that this gentleman is allegedly a Russian.

PEGUES: On Sunday, Arizona senator John McCain called for Stone to testify in upcoming hearings. Anthony, Stone defiantly told us that his response to that is "Game on."

And Monica Crowley is in the game too

https://www.legistorm.com/pro_news/view/id/1902.html



Donald Trump insider and one-time National Security Council contender Monica Crowley is lobbying on behalf of Ukrainian oligarch and Trump donor Victor Pinchuk, who favors his country's compromise with Russia.

Writing in the Wall Street Journal in December, Pinchuk called for Ukraine to make "painful compromises" to reach peace with Russia, including eschewing proposed European Union and NATO membership and an "incremental rollback" of Russian sanctions. "Crimea must not get in the way of a deal that ends the war in the east on an equitable basis," he added.

The billionaire was reportedly the Trump Foundation's "single largest outside donor" of 2015, according to the Daily Beast. That year, the charity accepted a $150,000 gift from Pinchuk in exchange for a 21-minute video, played at the Victor Pinchuk Foundation's Yalta European Strategy conference, of Trump speaking with Fox News analyst Doug Schoen - whose name also appears on the lobbying filing as the primary registrant.

Crowley, who gained recent notoriety for her alleged plagiarism, is providing Pinchuk with "outreach services," according to the filing.