Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
These are calls for mass political violence, against all Democrats. They openly call for the bombing of "Democrat" cities and for the jailing or killing of Democratic politicians. They are from some of the most influential voices in right-wing politics. Will anyone say anything?

https://bsky.app/profile/whstancil.bsky.social/post/3lyjrmamlzs2p

I would remind people that to date, there is zero information about the shooter, their affiliations or their motivations, and yet, the right has singularly decided it is time for open warfare on the left, the blue cities and blue states.

This is what maga lives for. All they want to do is kill “liberals” and people in blue states. Remember what ever maga does they are heroes.

I mean, this thread is about a conservative pundit who was just assassinated for visiting college campuses and respectfully engaging with people who had different opinions than him.

I think your post missed the mark a bit.

No the reason for worry is real. Look at what the RWNJs are saying. This thread started about a horrible murder. It's evolving into the RWs equally horrible attempts to use this murder to stoke further violence against other innocent people. Wake up.

Can you give some examples of RwNJs threatening murder on this thread?

All I’m reading is snarky comments from LWNJs who seem ready to start a civil war at any moment.

Go online. You can easily find what your brothers are saying. The vast majority of people have never heard of Charlie Kirk before today. Seriously he would only show up on your TikTok feed if you are far down the right wing rabbit hole. This is how the internet works. The “LWNJs” only exist in your mind.

Maybe Trump should have banned TikTok after all?

Just bc you hadn’t heard of Charlie before today doesn’t mean the same of the “vast majority”.

The man was all over the place. You saw the crowd from today. He’s been everywhere. A lot of people loved him and a lot of people hated him. Unfortunately the hate prevailed.

I really don't think the vast majority knows much of who this person is. Yes millions do. But many millions do not. I think most people are going to get a lot of their knowledge about who this person is from the coverage happening since he was shot.

How much has this country deteriorated. Left wing nuts are no different than right wing nuts. No one should be harmed/killed because of their political stances.

I liked him most of the time. I didn’t agree with all his views and was a bit to arrogant form me , but I like that he would stand andn idebate with others.

Anonymous wrote:It seemed like it was very busy, how did the shooter even get out of the event?

He or she would have to look similar to everyone else. He/she is 200 yards away. The access to the area the shooter used could be another 200 yards away from the site. They just wait till the crowd moves past them, blend in with the crowd and drive away. The only problem is the gun. Maybe he/she broke it down which can be done very quickly. If you have a plan it could be fairly easy to do and get away.


They never caught the person who put bombs out on Jan 6.

I think this will depend on how many people are involved. The more people the great chance of someone talking.

Anonymous wrote:It seemed like it was very busy, how did the shooter even get out of the event?

This is Utah. Little security. A 200 yard shot is still beginner level to make even with iron sights. I anything I'd say the shooter missed high (no one aims at the neck).

It seemed like it was very busy, how did the shooter even get out of the event?

Hmm. Maybe it’s Utah that needs the National Guard not DC or LA or Chicago.

Anonymous wrote:Because the FBI has been gutted, and the domestic terror team dismantled, it is unlikely the shooter will ever be identified and brought to justice, which opens the door for the right to blame it on the left and start the retribution game.

That was by design.

Anonymous wrote:Why aren’t we talking about the need for gun control?

At this point we need every gun we can get our hands on to protect us from MAGAs who will be trying very very hard to murder us. Screw gun control. I want every single Dem in America armed to the teeth now. This is war. We need to defend ourselves now.

Anonymous wrote:
These are calls for mass political violence, against all Democrats. They openly call for the bombing of "Democrat" cities and for the jailing or killing of Democratic politicians. They are from some of the most influential voices in right-wing politics. Will anyone say anything?

https://bsky.app/profile/whstancil.bsky.social/post/3lyjrmamlzs2p

I would remind people that to date, there is zero information about the shooter, their affiliations or their motivations, and yet, the right has singularly decided it is time for open warfare on the left, the blue cities and blue states.

Without overreacting, I would be cautious about attending mass gatherings in the next week or two. As a gay person I hate to say it, but I could see LGBT gathering spots as an easy revenge target for these people, as well as political rallies for progressive candidates and causes.

Anonymous wrote:Because the FBI has been gutted, and the domestic terror team dismantled, it is unlikely the shooter will ever be identified and brought to justice, which opens the door for the right to blame it on the left and start the retribution game.

Oh it will be retribution against elected democrats. You heard what Trump said. We are heading to civil war with drone technology. Watching what is happening in the Ukraine there is no way to protect anyone… not that the US military or federal law enforcement would protect a democrat.

Anonymous wrote:Why aren’t we talking about the need for gun control?

We? Been discussed constantly. There are what, 400M+ guns in circulation. You can 3D print them. They're not going away. They don't just fall apart. Banning them outright has limited effect. What do you propose?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Unrelated to Charlie Kirk but who makes this expression in their professional portrait lmfao.

He’s not making anything, he has an issue with his left eye. Glad to see you are ok with mocking someone’s looks.

Be a better person.

Oh, shut up. I genuinely thought he was making a face.

MAGA mocks people's appearances daily - knowingly, which I did not know the guy had a facial injury - so spare me the faux-outrage.

He is just making a face. There is no record of him having an injury and in other pics his eyebrow doesn't look like that.



This pic is from the 2024 campaign so unless the "childhood injury" happened within the last year...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Unrelated to Charlie Kirk but who makes this expression in their professional portrait lmfao.

He’s not making anything, he has an issue with his left eye. Glad to see you are ok with mocking someone’s looks.

Be a better person.

Oh, shut up. I genuinely thought he was making a face.

MAGA mocks people's appearances daily - knowingly, which I did not know the guy had a facial injury - so spare me the faux-outrage.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who here has seen the video? Wondering if I should.

No, you shouldn't. It's bad.

It was a lot of blood, I wish I hadn’t have seen it.

He is hit in the side of the neck. Jugular vein.