Anonymous wrote:More for the seemingly never ending list of things that Herschel Walker lies about:

None of this matters to MAGAs.

^ Re Herschel Walker, we're looking at cringeworthy in the rear-view mirror.

More for the seemingly never ending list of things that Herschel Walker lies about:

Quite a few interesting insights in this article that indicate a more hospitable environment for the Democrats: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/10/03/gop-selfhatred-midterm-elections/

“Republicans view their party more favorably now — a consequence due partly to changes wrought by Donald Trump — but this data reveals a deep, underlying distrust between GOP voters and elected officials. As soon as the GOP loses a battle — such as the fight to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act or the 2020 presidential election — its voters flip from a “favorable” to “unfavorable” view of their own party.

The GOP’s easily disaffected base has made Republican primaries increasingly volatile — and may decrease the party’s chances of retaking the Senate.”

Several great charts, too, but I can’t seem to get them to copy over.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I've never heard of this outfit. What's their track record? A gap like this in Ohio seems unlikely.

Siena today:

It’s just sad that the GOP puts out crappy candidates like JD Vance and still good candidates like Tim Ryan can’t get elected…

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:538 Deluxe Senate Forecast: 69% chance of Dem control

CO: D+10, 91%
NH: D+8, 86%
AZ: D+6, 80%
PA: D+5, 80%
NV: D+0.7, 54%
---50 seats---
GA: D+1, 54%
WI: D-2, 39%
NC: D-2, 35%
OH: D-4, 29%
FL: D-7, 14%
UT: D-13, 7%

Why do they say “D-13” when it’s a Republican vs and ex-Republican? There’s no “D” running.

McMullin is an independent endorsed by the Democrats, similar to Al Gross in Alaska last cycle.

That I knew, but I still wouldn’t call it a “D” seat. Unless the “D” just means “decent and unwilling to countenance treason and sedition.”

Well, sometimes you got to fight the war with the army you have. McMullin isn’t a dem-you’re not going to get a Dem elected in Utah but he’s the best we’ve got.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:538 Deluxe Senate Forecast: 69% chance of Dem control

CO: D+10, 91%
NH: D+8, 86%
AZ: D+6, 80%
PA: D+5, 80%
NV: D+0.7, 54%
---50 seats---
GA: D+1, 54%
WI: D-2, 39%
NC: D-2, 35%
OH: D-4, 29%
FL: D-7, 14%
UT: D-13, 7%

Why do they say “D-13” when it’s a Republican vs and ex-Republican? There’s no “D” running.

McMullin is an independent endorsed by the Democrats, similar to Al Gross in Alaska last cycle.

That I knew, but I still wouldn’t call it a “D” seat. Unless the “D” just means “decent and unwilling to countenance treason and sedition.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Pennsylvania voters have a long history of knowing about this and still electing Fetterman to statewide office. And he has paid off all the liens.
https://www.wtae.com/amp/article/senate-candidate-john-fetterman-owed-thousands-in-unpaid-taxes-records-show/7479117

Yeah that’s peanuts against the amount the Trump claimed in losses so he could not pay taxes for years. And he paid it back. The difference is that the little people get caught and try to make it right. But it worries me that Dr Oz is catching up in the polls. He has proved himself to be dishonest and uncaring. Although I think it’s funny that Republicans think it’s fine that he’s a Turkish Muslim after acting like Barack Obama was the worst person in the world for being “rumored” to be a Muslim

If the GOP didn’t have double standards they’d have no standards.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:538 Deluxe Senate Forecast: 69% chance of Dem control

CO: D+10, 91%
NH: D+8, 86%
AZ: D+6, 80%
PA: D+5, 80%
NV: D+0.7, 54%
---50 seats---
GA: D+1, 54%
WI: D-2, 39%
NC: D-2, 35%
OH: D-4, 29%
FL: D-7, 14%
UT: D-13, 7%

Why do they say “D-13” when it’s a Republican vs and ex-Republican? There’s no “D” running.

McMullin is an independent endorsed by the Democrats, similar to Al Gross in Alaska last cycle.

Anonymous wrote:538 Deluxe Senate Forecast: 69% chance of Dem control

CO: D+10, 91%
NH: D+8, 86%
AZ: D+6, 80%
PA: D+5, 80%
NV: D+0.7, 54%
---50 seats---
GA: D+1, 54%
WI: D-2, 39%
NC: D-2, 35%
OH: D-4, 29%
FL: D-7, 14%
UT: D-13, 7%

Why do they say “D-13” when it’s a Republican vs and ex-Republican? There’s no “D” running.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Pennsylvania voters have a long history of knowing about this and still electing Fetterman to statewide office. And he has paid off all the liens.
https://www.wtae.com/amp/article/senate-candidate-john-fetterman-owed-thousands-in-unpaid-taxes-records-show/7479117

Yeah that’s peanuts against the amount the Trump claimed in losses so he could not pay taxes for years. And he paid it back. The difference is that the little people get caught and try to make it right. But it worries me that Dr Oz is catching up in the polls. He has proved himself to be dishonest and uncaring. Although I think it’s funny that Republicans think it’s fine that he’s a Turkish Muslim after acting like Barack Obama was the worst person in the world for being “rumored” to be a Muslim

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I've never heard of this outfit. What's their track record? A gap like this in Ohio seems unlikely.

Siena today:

Anonymous wrote:538 Deluxe Senate Forecast: 69% chance of Dem control

CO: D+10, 91%
NH: D+8, 86%
AZ: D+6, 80%
PA: D+5, 80%
NV: D+0.7, 54%
---50 seats---
GA: D+1, 54%
WI: D-2, 39%
NC: D-2, 35%
OH: D-4, 29%
FL: D-7, 14%
UT: D-13, 7%

Reasonable list, but latest polls are showing Nevada at R+3 or 4.

538 Deluxe Senate Forecast: 69% chance of Dem control

CO: D+10, 91%
NH: D+8, 86%
AZ: D+6, 80%
PA: D+5, 80%
NV: D+0.7, 54%
---50 seats---
GA: D+1, 54%
WI: D-2, 39%
NC: D-2, 35%
OH: D-4, 29%
FL: D-7, 14%
UT: D-13, 7%

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Wasn't that a sign of being Smart?

Some consider tax avoidance smart, but no one in good standing considers tax evasion smart.

Hmm potato, poteto…