Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The real tragedy here, is that she is an easy and experienced but unimpressive lay. A friend of mine had her when he lived in Boston. Very similar set of circumstances, but he was more careful to be discreet. He said she was remarkably mid when you consider the amount of experience she's had.

What kind of friend is this. Why is a grown old ass man bragging about sn affair with a 50year old. Says a lot more about him that he would trash his “mid” experience with her.

+1.

It also says a lot about the PP who thinks the real tragedy is that she is an easy and mid lay.

As if these men are any better lays than she is. Lol

Anonymous wrote:The real tragedy here, is that she is an easy and experienced but unimpressive lay. A friend of mine had her when he lived in Boston. Very similar set of circumstances, but he was more careful to be discreet. He said she was remarkably mid when you consider the amount of experience she's had.

What kind of friend is this. Why is a grown old ass man bragging about sn affair with a 50year old. Says a lot more about him that he would trash his “mid” experience with her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The CEO at least has the sense to stay quiet. I wonder if she’s trying to needle him into a response.

She’s trying to upset the CEO’s wife and poke at her. Trust me, I know the type. She is absolutely pissed he did not divorce the wife when she was trying to get him into an “exit affair.” Her anger at him is so apparent. He would not play her game and lie about being separated like her second ex-husband did.

I totally buy that the CEO has been carrying on affairs for years and lying to women he’s “basically separated” from his wife. So separated… he’s staying with her even after publicly humiliating her and their kids with a viral affair! He’s a bigger scumbag than this HR trainwreck and his wife is an idiot for staying with him. The CEO is skating on this because he’s rich and also because crazy projecting scorned women have seized on the lady. Takes two to tango and he had the power over the HR executive. The woman is flailing trying to control her narrative but it’s probably a lost cause.

There’s no way she thought he was separated if he’s not. As HR she knows more and has access to more personal info about him than anybody in the company. She knows that they live at the same address, go on vacation every year, that he’s showing up for his kids sports events, that the wife is on his insurance benefits, that he or his admin sent her flowers for their anniversary, etc. no way she thought he was separated, unless he really was.

And if she is has any experience with liars and cheating spouses, and has been divorced or married, she should have enough sense to wanna test and verify

And it may be unethical or against HR or company policies for her to check all this information, but we know she’s not above doing things that are not ethical or against company policy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Head of HR here, I can't believe that she was trying to whitewash her affair, as if it would be understandable if they were both going through an affair. It is extremely egregious and unethical even if they were both single. A Chief People Officer has a huge influence on the CEO and people decision making around people in a company, and to have any kind of relationship beyond purely professional is unfair to people's careers and livelihoods within the company, not to mention impact on the culture and morale of the company. She does not deserve death threats, but I think she is exaggerating that. She certainly deserves censure and being the object of some schadenfreude humor, payback for everyone who has been a victim of corporate hypocricy and double standards.

💯

+1 She has shown the world how she got that position.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think she deserved death threats, or even public humiliation, but, by doing all these interviews she keeps it in the public eye and forces her family to relive the humiliation. I do judge her for this.

And the kids from both families, as well as betrayed spouses. She’s a very selfish and self-centered person, obviously.

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The CEO at least has the sense to stay quiet. I wonder if she’s trying to needle him into a response.

She’s trying to upset the CEO’s wife and poke at her. Trust me, I know the type. She is absolutely pissed he did not divorce the wife when she was trying to get him into an “exit affair.” Her anger at him is so apparent. He would not play her game and lie about being separated like her second ex-husband did.

You are mental. You don’t know anything about this woman. Stop projecting your personal issues on to strangers.

How do you account for her poor judgment in a work setting and her sleazy behavior?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The CEO at least has the sense to stay quiet. I wonder if she’s trying to needle him into a response.

She’s trying to upset the CEO’s wife and poke at her. Trust me, I know the type. She is absolutely pissed he did not divorce the wife when she was trying to get him into an “exit affair.” Her anger at him is so apparent. He would not play her game and lie about being separated like her second ex-husband did.

You are mental. You don’t know anything about this woman. Stop projecting your personal issues on to strangers.

You must not know many women. This type of woman is a cliche for a reason. If you are over 50 there is a 99.999% chance you know or knew someone like this. I know two.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think she deserved death threats, or even public humiliation, but, by doing all these interviews she keeps it in the public eye and forces her family to relive the humiliation. I do judge her for this.

If there was ever any doubt that she was a shitty mom, there surely can be none now. Picking at that scab over and over again. She needs help for her sex addiction.

+100….who will be lucky husband # 3 😂?

Anonymous wrote:I don't think she deserved death threats, or even public humiliation, but, by doing all these interviews she keeps it in the public eye and forces her family to relive the humiliation. I do judge her for this.

And the kids from both families, as well as betrayed spouses. She’s a very selfish and self-centered person, obviously.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think she deserved death threats, or even public humiliation, but, by doing all these interviews she keeps it in the public eye and forces her family to relive the humiliation. I do judge her for this.

If there was ever any doubt that she was a shitty mom, there surely can be none now. Picking at that scab over and over again. She needs help for her sex addiction.

+1 She's indeed a lying hustler. And to think she was in a high up HR "position." Now we know how she got there.

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. 😂

Anonymous wrote:I don't think she deserved death threats, or even public humiliation, but, by doing all these interviews she keeps it in the public eye and forces her family to relive the humiliation. I do judge her for this.

If there was ever any doubt that she was a shitty mom, there surely can be none now. Picking at that scab over and over again. She needs help for her sex addiction.

I don't think she deserved death threats, or even public humiliation, but, by doing all these interviews she keeps it in the public eye and forces her family to relive the humiliation. I do judge her for this.

Anonymous wrote:I listened to the podcast. Maybe I'm naive, but I actually believe her for the most part. She used poor judgment but she certainly didn't deserve the amount of vitriol she received. And she's unfortunately right about women being harder on other women than they are on men. I think it's gross that her appearance was scrutinized and attacked. Plus at the end of the day, Andy Byron was the CEO-ultimately he's most at fault.

Well, her re-branding worked on you. She's getting her money's worth from her crisis PR team.

Anonymous wrote:The real tragedy here, is that she is an easy and experienced but unimpressive lay. A friend of mine had her when he lived in Boston. Very similar set of circumstances, but he was more careful to be discreet. He said she was remarkably mid when you consider the amount of experience she's had.

lol omg brutal

😆