Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It gets worse - they had ballistics shields to confront the shooter the entire time…
![]()
https://www.instagram.com/p/CfC7WtMuOfI/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
What’s the point of having cops if these heavily trained, heavily armed, heavily protected cowards will not save the lives of little children?
I am glad video footage exist so Texans can see what the stupid propaganda and GOP policies get them.
The reality is we’re all afraid of someone with an AR-15. Asking small police forces to confront a shooter with a military weapon is not fair. They are to blame for the poor response but never should have had this responsibility to begin with. Those weapons should be banned.
I agree - but also why did that have that highly militarized (and presumably trained?) SWAT team?!
![]()
What an absolute tragedy, and I cannot believe that these people waited outside while the gunman slaughtered children. There is no amount of information or analysis that will ever let me get my mind around that.
They did not show up. The swat team came from CBP.
No I get that - I was responding to PP's statement that "Asking small police forces to confront a shooter with a military weapon is not fair. They are to blame for the poor response but never should have had this responsibility to begin with." Police forces the country over are militarized like this - but why, if it's not fair to ask them to respond to a situation like this? What if there were TWO shooters - like Columbine? Then they wait outside twice as long - despite having this sort of gear and training?
What is the point of a militarized police department if they still can't be tasked with responding to an active shooter. Am I a step away from defund the police?
people shouldn't even have military grade weapons.
+1 million. The USA is the only developed country that lets people buy automatic weapons as easily as they buy cigarettes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It gets worse - they had ballistics shields to confront the shooter the entire time…
![]()
https://www.instagram.com/p/CfC7WtMuOfI/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
What’s the point of having cops if these heavily trained, heavily armed, heavily protected cowards will not save the lives of little children?
I am glad video footage exist so Texans can see what the stupid propaganda and GOP policies get them.
The reality is we’re all afraid of someone with an AR-15. Asking small police forces to confront a shooter with a military weapon is not fair. They are to blame for the poor response but never should have had this responsibility to begin with. Those weapons should be banned.
I agree - but also why did that have that highly militarized (and presumably trained?) SWAT team?!
![]()
What an absolute tragedy, and I cannot believe that these people waited outside while the gunman slaughtered children. There is no amount of information or analysis that will ever let me get my mind around that.
They did not show up. The swat team came from CBP.
No I get that - I was responding to PP's statement that "Asking small police forces to confront a shooter with a military weapon is not fair. They are to blame for the poor response but never should have had this responsibility to begin with." Police forces the country over are militarized like this - but why, if it's not fair to ask them to respond to a situation like this? What if there were TWO shooters - like Columbine? Then they wait outside twice as long - despite having this sort of gear and training?
What is the point of a militarized police department if they still can't be tasked with responding to an active shooter. Am I a step away from defund the police?
people shouldn't even have military grade weapons.
+1 million. The USA is the only developed country that lets people buy automatic weapons as easily as they buy cigarettes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It gets worse - they had ballistics shields to confront the shooter the entire time…
![]()
https://www.instagram.com/p/CfC7WtMuOfI/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
What’s the point of having cops if these heavily trained, heavily armed, heavily protected cowards will not save the lives of little children?
I am glad video footage exist so Texans can see what the stupid propaganda and GOP policies get them.
The reality is we’re all afraid of someone with an AR-15. Asking small police forces to confront a shooter with a military weapon is not fair. They are to blame for the poor response but never should have had this responsibility to begin with. Those weapons should be banned.
I agree - but also why did that have that highly militarized (and presumably trained?) SWAT team?!
![]()
What an absolute tragedy, and I cannot believe that these people waited outside while the gunman slaughtered children. There is no amount of information or analysis that will ever let me get my mind around that.
They did not show up. The swat team came from CBP.
No I get that - I was responding to PP's statement that "Asking small police forces to confront a shooter with a military weapon is not fair. They are to blame for the poor response but never should have had this responsibility to begin with." Police forces the country over are militarized like this - but why, if it's not fair to ask them to respond to a situation like this? What if there were TWO shooters - like Columbine? Then they wait outside twice as long - despite having this sort of gear and training?
What is the point of a militarized police department if they still can't be tasked with responding to an active shooter. Am I a step away from defund the police?
people shouldn't even have military grade weapons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many people know that Arredondo is not chief of Uvlade police but school district police chief? It's an important distinction.
Hiw many people know one or teacher victim's husband was a school resource offcer that had gotten a message from his wife and was detained on scene by the police for demanding to go into the classrooms and do something?
And? Just proves there was yet another bad decision by Arredondo
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many people know that Arredondo is not chief of Uvlade police but school district police chief? It's an important distinction.
Hiw many people know one or teacher victim's husband was a school resource offcer that had gotten a message from his wife and was detained on scene by the police for demanding to go into the classrooms and do something?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many people know that Arredondo is not chief of Uvlade police but school district police chief? It's an important distinction.
Uvalde has clammed up and isn’t telling anyone much of anything. Which one was actually the scene commander?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There’s the ‘door propped’ peddler and the ‘mom blame’ peddler.
Both grasping for ways to distract focus from the real problems here.
1) Access to guns.
2) Cowards that carry guns.
The coward with the gun was reported to the social media company he posted on over and over and over again. What was done? Nothing.
Facebook? Hold them accountable!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There’s the ‘door propped’ peddler and the ‘mom blame’ peddler.
Both grasping for ways to distract focus from the real problems here.
1) Access to guns.
2) Cowards that carry guns.
The coward with the gun was reported to the social media company he posted on over and over and over again. What was done? Nothing.