Anonymous wrote:The poster who thinks the answer is for everyone to go to therapy.
Anonymous wrote:
Gotcha Game trolls are the ones who do not respond to the main idea/ discussion points of OPs but pick on one trivial side bar in a Gotcha type way. This seems to be in order to humiliate the OPs while not adding anything substantive to the conversations …
The gas lighting is that they doggedly refuse to move on from generally silly, vindictive positions no matter how irrelevant they are, and send otherwise good threads into low level mud slinging …
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The "$400k HHI is middle class!" DCUM-er
it's not?
Anonymous wrote:The "$400k HHI is middle class!" DCUM-er
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lately it is the political leftist who keeps writing "Be specific" when making unclear demands for some form of "evidence" in political threads. We are probably on the same or similar political side but it is annoying af because that poster never actually accepts any responses. So they ask for specificity but don't do anything with it when provided other than derail conversation. It's frustrating and just stops conversation.
+1
Exactly! I’d rather share fictional stories that express my fears. Who cares if they are real or not - it’s just how I FEEL that is important.
Well, you certainly have a skill for useless derailment, I will give you that. But no skill whatsoever for cogent argument.
Argument over what exactly? Someone’s “feelings”?
Can’t have a productive discussion without facts.
Now you are off topic for this thread while simultaneously demonstrating exactly why you are both a most annoying DCUM poster and an incompetent debater.
I will confront misinformation whenever I see it. Guess that annoys some people who don’t care for facts or reason.
Happy to have a rational discussion with anyone based in reality. Those people are few and far between on DCUM.
You don't have the capacity for rational discussion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lately it is the political leftist who keeps writing "Be specific" when making unclear demands for some form of "evidence" in political threads. We are probably on the same or similar political side but it is annoying af because that poster never actually accepts any responses. So they ask for specificity but don't do anything with it when provided other than derail conversation. It's frustrating and just stops conversation.
+1
Exactly! I’d rather share fictional stories that express my fears. Who cares if they are real or not - it’s just how I FEEL that is important.
Well, you certainly have a skill for useless derailment, I will give you that. But no skill whatsoever for cogent argument.
Argument over what exactly? Someone’s “feelings”?
Can’t have a productive discussion without facts.
Now you are off topic for this thread while simultaneously demonstrating exactly why you are both a most annoying DCUM poster and an incompetent debater.
I will confront misinformation whenever I see it. Guess that annoys some people who don’t care for facts or reason.
Happy to have a rational discussion with anyone based in reality. Those people are few and far between on DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lately it is the political leftist who keeps writing "Be specific" when making unclear demands for some form of "evidence" in political threads. We are probably on the same or similar political side but it is annoying af because that poster never actually accepts any responses. So they ask for specificity but don't do anything with it when provided other than derail conversation. It's frustrating and just stops conversation.
+1
Exactly! I’d rather share fictional stories that express my fears. Who cares if they are real or not - it’s just how I FEEL that is important.
Well, you certainly have a skill for useless derailment, I will give you that. But no skill whatsoever for cogent argument.
Argument over what exactly? Someone’s “feelings”?
Can’t have a productive discussion without facts.
Now you are off topic for this thread while simultaneously demonstrating exactly why you are both a most annoying DCUM poster and an incompetent debater.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lately it is the political leftist who keeps writing "Be specific" when making unclear demands for some form of "evidence" in political threads. We are probably on the same or similar political side but it is annoying af because that poster never actually accepts any responses. So they ask for specificity but don't do anything with it when provided other than derail conversation. It's frustrating and just stops conversation.
+1
Exactly! I’d rather share fictional stories that express my fears. Who cares if they are real or not - it’s just how I FEEL that is important.
Well, you certainly have a skill for useless derailment, I will give you that. But no skill whatsoever for cogent argument.
Argument over what exactly? Someone’s “feelings”?
Can’t have a productive discussion without facts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lately it is the political leftist who keeps writing "Be specific" when making unclear demands for some form of "evidence" in political threads. We are probably on the same or similar political side but it is annoying af because that poster never actually accepts any responses. So they ask for specificity but don't do anything with it when provided other than derail conversation. It's frustrating and just stops conversation.
+1
Exactly! I’d rather share fictional stories that express my fears. Who cares if they are real or not - it’s just how I FEEL that is important.
Well, you certainly have a skill for useless derailment, I will give you that. But no skill whatsoever for cogent argument.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lately it is the political leftist who keeps writing "Be specific" when making unclear demands for some form of "evidence" in political threads. We are probably on the same or similar political side but it is annoying af because that poster never actually accepts any responses. So they ask for specificity but don't do anything with it when provided other than derail conversation. It's frustrating and just stops conversation.
+1
Exactly! I’d rather share fictional stories that express my fears. Who cares if they are real or not - it’s just how I FEEL that is important.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lately it is the political leftist who keeps writing "Be specific" when making unclear demands for some form of "evidence" in political threads. We are probably on the same or similar political side but it is annoying af because that poster never actually accepts any responses. So they ask for specificity but don't do anything with it when provided other than derail conversation. It's frustrating and just stops conversation.
+1