Anonymous wrote: But if someone is out there intentionally provoking people and bringing food because he knows it upsets dog owners-per his website. that’s not her just seeing a black man walking down the street and calling police out of the blue.
Anonymous wrote:I just read the man who she called police normally provocates dog owners. It puts a different spin on this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As someone who knows Amy, I’ve enjoyed the last 80 pages.
You can't just drop that and dip. What are your thoughts? What is your relationship to her? Do you believe her apology to be earnest?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just read the man who she called police normally provocates dog owners. It puts a different spin on this.
LOL OMG so many of the virtue signalers won't know what to do if that is true.
Actually, they will just move on to the next provocative incident and continue their keyboard warrior activities. Never give up! Haha
So the birdman really is a Karen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just read the man who she called police normally provocates dog owners. It puts a different spin on this.
LOL OMG so many of the virtue signalers won't know what to do if that is true.
Actually, they will just move on to the next provocative incident and continue their keyboard warrior activities. Never give up! Haha
It really doesn't put a different spin on it.
Look, he probably should have just zipped it and called the authorities on her. I don't confront people as a general proposition b/c, well, people are crazy. They may have guns and escalate. Or physically escalate. The dog leash law wouldn't have been enough for me to approach her and tell her what to do, even if i am right. He did and that's fine. He is right, after all.
But the fact that he approached her, or others, trying to enforce the rules doesn't mean that he should be racially stereotyped, subjected to lies about him b/c of the color of skin, or have some psychotic woman wield the threat of police like a weapon. She did. And she likely would NOT have done that for a white man, another woman. She did it b/c he was black and her biases (whether she acknowledges them or not) caused her to react that way. So, yeah, it changes nothing about this story.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just read the man who she called police normally provocates dog owners. It puts a different spin on this.
LOL OMG so many of the virtue signalers won't know what to do if that is true.
Actually, they will just move on to the next provocative incident and continue their keyboard warrior activities. Never give up! Haha
It really doesn't put a different spin on it.
Look, he probably should have just zipped it and called the authorities on her. I don't confront people as a general proposition b/c, well, people are crazy. They may have guns and escalate. Or physically escalate. The dog leash law wouldn't have been enough for me to approach her and tell her what to do, even if i am right. He did and that's fine. He is right, after all.
But the fact that he approached her, or others, trying to enforce the rules doesn't mean that he should be racially stereotyped, subjected to lies about him b/c of the color of skin, or have some psychotic woman wield the threat of police like a weapon. She did. And she likely would NOT have done that for a white man, another woman. She did it b/c he was black and her biases (whether she acknowledges them or not) caused her to react that way. So, yeah, it changes nothing about this story.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just read the man who she called police normally provocates dog owners. It puts a different spin on this.
LOL OMG so many of the virtue signalers won't know what to do if that is true.
Actually, they will just move on to the next provocative incident and continue their keyboard warrior activities. Never give up! Haha
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just read the man who she called police normally provocates dog owners. It puts a different spin on this.
LOL OMG so many of the virtue signalers won't know what to do if that is true.
Actually, they will just move on to the next provocative incident and continue their keyboard warrior activities. Never give up! Haha
Anonymous wrote:I just read the man who she called police normally provocates dog owners. It puts a different spin on this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I came back here because someone started a Amy is a homewrecker thread that was deleted before I could read it. What's the scoop?
Maybe someone thought she was flirting with the birdman?
I saw a story that alleged she falsely sued a married guy she’s been sleeping with, saying he stole $65,000 from her or something.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I came back here because someone started a Amy is a homewrecker thread that was deleted before I could read it. What's the scoop?
Maybe someone thought she was flirting with the birdman?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As someone who knows Amy, I’ve enjoyed the last 80 pages.
As someone who knows the AA Coopers ( as in not Amy) I say: so typical, such jerks.
No you don't you POS. You do not know the AA Coopers. You are not worthy of even licking their boots because they put their names out there whereas you turd are writing anonymously and claiming you know them.
Anonymous wrote:I came back here because someone started a Amy is a homewrecker thread that was deleted before I could read it. What's the scoop?