Anonymous wrote:http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/09/flynn-paid-ex-fbi-agents-behavior-analysts-in-lobbying-work-for-turkish-government/#ixzz4axQPmo6w

Possible smoking gun as Flynn paid several former NY FBI agents in the fall of 2016. NY FBI put pressure to release the Comey letter related to Hillary's emails on Anthony Weiner's computer.

This is so dirty and corrupt. Where is our law enforcement? Why aren't they pursuing criminal investigations against members of the GOP and Trump's inner circle????!!! Oh wait ...

http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/09/flynn-paid-ex-fbi-agents-behavior-analysts-in-lobbying-work-for-turkish-government/#ixzz4axQPmo6w

Possible smoking gun as Flynn paid several former NY FBI agents in the fall of 2016. NY FBI put pressure to release the Comey letter related to Hillary's emails on Anthony Weiner's computer.

Good thread diagramming all of the connections here:
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/626478.page

Just to add in on the PP, the intel that was shared today is tupically intel that only POTUS, VP & Gang of 8 have access to. Including such a large group is a big deal. This is not typical.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or were they? Apparently President Obamas administration had cyber tools to make their activities look like the Russians. Not sure this threads 80 pages are relevant anymore. Poor Barry, to watch what was already an anemic legacy disappear. At least he has Valerie to hold his hand through the tough times.

<--- "Hello, my name is _______. In lieu of thinking critically, I have agreed to believe whatever my favorite right wing sources tell me to think, and I will do so unquestioningly. Also, they faked the moon landing."

Here is an op-ed from the New York Times for a gentle introduction: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/09/opinion/connecting-trumps-dots-to-russia.html?_r=0 (an op-ed, by the way, is an opinion piece based on facts. So this is Nicholas Kristof's opinion, but it's based on facts, on what we know.)

Hey I think I've seen this before! It was a New York Times piece that said Hillary would be my next president! It too was based on facts like no candidate has ever won the presidency when everyone dislikes them so much and everyone from transgendered cats to illegal aliens was terrified of what might happen to the country if the billionaire won. And, well, you know how that ended. So yeah, this sounds like more liberal drivel. Sorry, not buying it.

You don't have to buy it.
if Comey does, that's enough for me.
He spent 8 hours with Senators investigating this stuff just today.
They might even subpoena Trump taxes & Trump campaign aids.

So, let's see, who is on Senate Intel Committee?

Republicans
James Risch Idaho
Marco Rubio Florida <--- This guy said he "won't be part of the cover up"
Susan Collins Maine <--- This lady said she is "open to subpoena tax returns"
Roy Blunt Missouri
James Lankford Oklahoma
Tom Cotton Arkansas <--- this guy went on CNN to trash TrumpCare. Coincidence?
John Cornyn Texas <--- this guy went on Fox to trash Trump's Wall. Coincidence?

Democrats
Dianne Feinstein California
Ron Wyden Oregon
Martin Heinrich New Mexico
Angus King Maine
Joe Manchin West Virginia
Kamala Harris California

GOP Senators speaking up against Trump b/c they know they have dirt on him.
Not that they will impeach him, no, but they can defend themselves from twitter attacks if needed.

Anonymous wrote:Drip drip drip http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/09/politics/fbi-investigation-continues-into-odd-computer-link-between-russian-bank-and-trump-organization/index.html


Go about 50 pages back in this thread and you will see reporting on this from October.

The original was an analysis by computer scientists (who are now scared to talk) that was 'dismissed' at the time, of course.
yet, FBI still considering worthy enough to investigate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or were they? Apparently President Obamas administration had cyber tools to make their activities look like the Russians. Not sure this threads 80 pages are relevant anymore. Poor Barry, to watch what was already an anemic legacy disappear. At least he has Valerie to hold his hand through the tough times.

<--- "Hello, my name is _______. In lieu of thinking critically, I have agreed to believe whatever my favorite right wing sources tell me to think, and I will do so unquestioningly. Also, they faked the moon landing."

Here is an op-ed from the New York Times for a gentle introduction: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/09/opinion/connecting-trumps-dots-to-russia.html?_r=0 (an op-ed, by the way, is an opinion piece based on facts. So this is Nicholas Kristof's opinion, but it's based on facts, on what we know.)

Hey I think I've seen this before! It was a New York Times piece that said Hillary would be my next president! It too was based on facts like no candidate has ever won the presidency when everyone dislikes them so much and everyone from transgendered cats to illegal aliens was terrified of what might happen to the country if the billionaire won. And, well, you know how that ended. So yeah, this sounds like more liberal drivel. Sorry, not buying it.

Poor bugger. Your reading comprehension is so dismal.

Anonymous wrote:
Sorry about that. I misread sarcasm for looney! My bad I have come across some crazies lately and I was responding rather quickly and I am honestly getting frustrated with the Russian bots on Twitter and on boards. There are so many Russian connections out there, I just want to see an honest to goodness investigation of all parties. At this point, I think we also probably need to look at Senate and House as well. They have both been instrumental in blocking investigations.

No worries. It's getting harder and harder to tell these days.

Anonymous wrote:Liberals want to take America back. More like give it away

And you wingnuts want to give it over to Putin.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or were they? Apparently President Obamas administration had cyber tools to make their activities look like the Russians. Not sure this threads 80 pages are relevant anymore. Poor Barry, to watch what was already an anemic legacy disappear. At least he has Valerie to hold his hand through the tough times.

<--- "Hello, my name is _______. In lieu of thinking critically, I have agreed to believe whatever my favorite right wing sources tell me to think, and I will do so unquestioningly. Also, they faked the moon landing."

Here is an op-ed from the New York Times for a gentle introduction: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/09/opinion/connecting-trumps-dots-to-russia.html?_r=0 (an op-ed, by the way, is an opinion piece based on facts. So this is Nicholas Kristof's opinion, but it's based on facts, on what we know.)

Hey I think I've seen this before! It was a New York Times piece that said Hillary would be my next president! It too was based on facts like no candidate has ever won the presidency when everyone dislikes them so much and everyone from transgendered cats to illegal aliens was terrified of what might happen to the country if the billionaire won. And, well, you know how that ended. So yeah, this sounds like more liberal drivel. Sorry, not buying it.

Go back to your OxyContin rush.

You trumpkin morons satisfied now? Nigel Farage the bag man between Trump and Asssange, who apparently just posted a bunch of crap on his crap site. And Uncle Vlad is laughing his ass off at how he's played us.

Frankly, you're all f*cking traitors at this point. Feel free to self-deport asshats.

Drip drip drip http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/09/politics/fbi-investigation-continues-into-odd-computer-link-between-russian-bank-and-trump-organization/index.html


Go about 50 pages back in this thread and you will see reporting on this from October.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or were they? Apparently President Obamas administration had cyber tools to make their activities look like the Russians. Not sure this threads 80 pages are relevant anymore. Poor Barry, to watch what was already an anemic legacy disappear. At least he has Valerie to hold his hand through the tough times.

<--- "Hello, my name is _______. In lieu of thinking critically, I have agreed to believe whatever my favorite right wing sources tell me to think, and I will do so unquestioningly. Also, they faked the moon landing."

Here is an op-ed from the New York Times for a gentle introduction: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/09/opinion/connecting-trumps-dots-to-russia.html?_r=0 (an op-ed, by the way, is an opinion piece based on facts. So this is Nicholas Kristof's opinion, but it's based on facts, on what we know.)

Hey I think I've seen this before! It was a New York Times piece that said Hillary would be my next president! It too was based on facts like no candidate has ever won the presidency when everyone dislikes them so much and everyone from transgendered cats to illegal aliens was terrified of what might happen to the country if the billionaire won. And, well, you know how that ended. So yeah, this sounds like more liberal drivel. Sorry, not buying it.

Liberals want to take America back. More like give it away

Anonymous wrote:If this is accurate, I would guess this administration won't last much longer

http://bipartisanreport.com/2017/03/06/intel-community-reportedly-ready-to-charge-most-of-trump-team-with-treason/

Oh, I so hope this ends in jail time. And their little dog, Reince, too.