Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If BB simply had divorced, he would have still been able to take Juliana to the gym and restaurants. They'd just need to move to a smaller place, not a big deal. I wonder if they were planning to leave the country.
Wife (ex-wife) would be afforded half his federal pension plus his TSP (gov'ts version of 401k) if they divorced.
And he would get half of hers. She was likely higher paid as a nurse. He was a low level fed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If BB simply had divorced, he would have still been able to take Juliana to the gym and restaurants. They'd just need to move to a smaller place, not a big deal. I wonder if they were planning to leave the country.
Wife (ex-wife) would be afforded half his federal pension plus his TSP (gov'ts version of 401k) if they divorced.
And he would get half of hers. She was likely higher paid as a nurse. He was a low level fed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If BB simply had divorced, he would have still been able to take Juliana to the gym and restaurants. They'd just need to move to a smaller place, not a big deal. I wonder if they were planning to leave the country.
Wife (ex-wife) would be afforded half his federal pension plus his TSP (gov'ts version of 401k) if they divorced.
And he would get half of hers. She was likely higher paid as a nurse. He was a low level fed.
Anonymous wrote:Does anybody know how tall CB was?
I am a previous poster who was friends with Joe Ryan and know that he was well over 6".
It will be interesting to see the angle of the knife wounds on CB.
Anonymous wrote:Does anybody know how tall CB was?
I am a previous poster who was friends with Joe Ryan and know that he was well over 6".
It will be interesting to see the angle of the knife wounds on CB.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sincerely trying to be objective here but this makes no sense to me. BB already had Ryan incapacitated, but he told AP to go get his (other?) gun from the safe, which she would have access to and be able to open? Why would there be any need for both of them, one of them presumably with little to no firearm experience, to have guns drawn on an already-shot JR?
Exactly. BB, with trained firearm experience, recognizes someone as a lethal threat and acts accordingly, but needs assistance from a 23 yo with no firearm experience who has to go retrieve a securely stored weapon to finish the job? Ludicrous.
If he already shot JR once, then he had a firearm on his person. Why, then, did he tell AP to go get another firearm?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If BB simply had divorced, he would have still been able to take Juliana to the gym and restaurants. They'd just need to move to a smaller place, not a big deal. I wonder if they were planning to leave the country.
Wife (ex-wife) would be afforded half his federal pension plus his TSP (gov'ts version of 401k) if they divorced.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Additional details in this report about what AP claimed happened on the morning of the murders: https://www.dcnewsnow.com/news/local-news/virginia/fairfax-county/defense-prosecution-outline-adult-relationships-activities-at-hearing-for-au-pair-charged-in-reston-murder-fairfax-county-judge-denies-bond/amp/
“Ryan supposedly stabbed Banfield several times in her neck. Magalhaes’ lawyer said Banfield’s husband shot Ryan in his head, not killing him, but in a way the medical examiner said would have blinded Ryan. The lawyer said Banfield’s husband told Magalhaes to grab his gun, which she got out of a safe in the bathroom. Magalhaes said Ryan started flailing around or posed a threat of some sort, possibly moving to get up off of the ground. Her lawyer said that’s when she shot Ryan, hitting him in the heart, and killing him.”
Sincerely trying to be objective here but this makes no sense to me. BB already had Ryan incapacitated, but he told AP to go get his (other?) gun from the safe, which she would have access to and be able to open? Why would there be any need for both of them, one of them presumably with little to no firearm experience, to have guns drawn on an already-shot JR?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As many have stated, yes the zoo does still require timed entry passes to get in. but the buildings don't open until 9, so going that early in the winter means you are wandering around outside without seeing really anything for at least an hour. it just doesn't make sense.
Parking-wise it's relatively easy to find street parking in mt. pleasant, especially in the morning on a weekday when people are leaving for work. I haven't read that much, but did they say anything about planning to park? I'm just not sure why that matters here.
Again, I also don't believe the story, but if you're driving from Herndon to the national zoo, it's going to take you at least an hour. The earlier you leave, the better the traffic. I would definitely leave as early as possible and just take my kid to Starbucks for 30 minutes in order to avoid sitting in traffic for 90 minutes rather than 60 minutes.
If you roll up on Conn Ave at exactly 9:28 you can park on the street right across from the entrance. But the buses know this too so you have to be right on time.
It's just a lot easier to park at the zoo, why can't you understand this?
Guys, it wasn’t even a consideration because we all know they were never going to get to the zoo.