Anonymous wrote:If a rival social media platform wants to compete for Twitter’s market, what is wrong with that? I thought you people believed in capitalism. If Elon wants to destroy his investment and fire the people who know how it works, he deserves to have a competitor wipe him out. That’s the free market.

Maybe not his only investment?

If a rival social media platform wants to compete for Twitter’s market, what is wrong with that? I thought you people believed in capitalism. If Elon wants to destroy his investment and fire the people who know how it works, he deserves to have a competitor wipe him out. That’s the free market.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This all seems like a well-organized campaign to muddy up Elon and twitter to promote other social media startups. It's pretty obvious NY Times is all-in on astroturfing new social media.

Someone should look up these rival platforms’ investors. Exploiting the situation by promoting platforms they’ve invested in would be the exact thing these parasitic rags would do under the guise of “social justice.”

Bingo.

Oh please. There's the projection angle and then there's just nutter silliness. You're well into the latter territory now.

Yeah, hedge funds and private equity giants behind a new social media start-up would never conspire to make tens of billion of dollars.

What is Truth social if not exactly what you decry above?

Hahahahahahaha you think Truth Social is going to make tens of billions of dollars?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember last week when Elon said: “Comedy had returned to Twitter”?

LOL

He’s so thin skinned.

The Left [now] considers identity theft, viral disinformation, smearing innocent people, libel, and slander to be "comedy"? Um, okay. Count me out.

That’s hilarious. You’re as funny as Elon.

Maybe I should lift your name and LinkedIn profile photo, create a twitter account, and tweet crazy "funny" things under your name and image, which could go viral, get picked up by local media, seen by employer, friends, kids' school officials, and get picked up by Google's search results for the rest of your life. It's just comedy, sweetie. Lighten up.

Why would you do that, is PP a billionaire who controls a gigantic social media company that she is making even worse than it already is and is squelching users who poke mild fun at her for it?

Further, parody of public figures is a constitution right; it’s not libel or slander. It’s more a grey area when you begin to “parody” a private individual.

I mean, we already had Elon accuse someone of being a pedo on his Twitter. There are no shibboleths with this guy.

Like every other right-wing troll he loves to dish it but he melt down at the slightest criticism. Snowflake.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember last week when Elon said: “Comedy had returned to Twitter”?

LOL

He’s so thin skinned.

The Left [now] considers identity theft, viral disinformation, smearing innocent people, libel, and slander to be "comedy"? Um, okay. Count me out.

That’s hilarious. You’re as funny as Elon.

Maybe I should lift your name and LinkedIn profile photo, create a twitter account, and tweet crazy "funny" things under your name and image, which could go viral, get picked up by local media, seen by employer, friends, kids' school officials, and get picked up by Google's search results for the rest of your life. It's just comedy, sweetie. Lighten up.

Why would you do that, is PP a billionaire who controls a gigantic social media company that she is making even worse than it already is and is squelching users who poke mild fun at her for it?

Further, parody of public figures is a constitution right; it’s not libel or slander. It’s more a grey area when you begin to “parody” a private individual.

I mean, we already had Elon accuse someone of being a pedo on his Twitter. There are no shibboleths with this guy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember last week when Elon said: “Comedy had returned to Twitter”?

LOL

He’s so thin skinned.

The Left [now] considers identity theft, viral disinformation, smearing innocent people, libel, and slander to be "comedy"? Um, okay. Count me out.

That’s hilarious. You’re as funny as Elon.

Maybe I should lift your name and LinkedIn profile photo, create a twitter account, and tweet crazy "funny" things under your name and image, which could go viral, get picked up by local media, seen by employer, friends, kids' school officials, and get picked up by Google's search results for the rest of your life. It's just comedy, sweetie. Lighten up.

Why would you do that, is PP a billionaire who controls a gigantic social media company that she is making even worse than it already is and is squelching users who poke mild fun at her for it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This all seems like a well-organized campaign to muddy up Elon and twitter to promote other social media startups. It's pretty obvious NY Times is all-in on astroturfing new social media.

Someone should look up these rival platforms’ investors. Exploiting the situation by promoting platforms they’ve invested in would be the exact thing these parasitic rags would do under the guise of “social justice.”

Bingo.

Oh please. There's the projection angle and then there's just nutter silliness. You're well into the latter territory now.

Yeah, hedge funds and private equity giants behind a new social media start-up would never conspire to make tens of billion of dollars.

What is Truth social if not exactly what you decry above?

OK, so you believe this kind of greed happens. Thus, you disputed PP’s suggestion because?

Because it’s obviously a bad faith argument/attempt to sow doubt and conspiracy theories unless pp has any actual facts to share. All they said was “hm smells like funny business” and then let everyone argue and muddy the waters. I’m hip to that scam tactic. I can directly show the path that Trump actually took and the reasons he openly states as to what motivated him to launch Truth social. PP is obviously a Republican partisan troll since if they had a problem with these tactic they would be preaching against the greedy and cynical Trump actions that are more dangerous and unethical and right in the open. You wouldn’t have to use your guessing skills and post innuendo.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This all seems like a well-organized campaign to muddy up Elon and twitter to promote other social media startups. It's pretty obvious NY Times is all-in on astroturfing new social media.

Someone should look up these rival platforms’ investors. Exploiting the situation by promoting platforms they’ve invested in would be the exact thing these parasitic rags would do under the guise of “social justice.”

Bingo.

Oh please. There's the projection angle and then there's just nutter silliness. You're well into the latter territory now.

Yeah, hedge funds and private equity giants behind a new social media start-up would never conspire to make tens of billion of dollars.

What is Truth social if not exactly what you decry above?

OK, so you believe this kind of greed happens. Thus, you disputed PP’s suggestion because?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This all seems like a well-organized campaign to muddy up Elon and twitter to promote other social media startups. It's pretty obvious NY Times is all-in on astroturfing new social media.

Someone should look up these rival platforms’ investors. Exploiting the situation by promoting platforms they’ve invested in would be the exact thing these parasitic rags would do under the guise of “social justice.”

Bingo.

Oh please. There's the projection angle and then there's just nutter silliness. You're well into the latter territory now.

Yeah, hedge funds and private equity giants behind a new social media start-up would never conspire to make tens of billion of dollars.

What is Truth social if not exactly what you decry above?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember last week when Elon said: “Comedy had returned to Twitter”?

LOL

He’s so thin skinned.

The Left [now] considers identity theft, viral disinformation, smearing innocent people, libel, and slander to be "comedy"? Um, okay. Count me out.

That’s hilarious. You’re as funny as Elon.

Maybe I should lift your name and LinkedIn profile photo, create a twitter account, and tweet crazy "funny" things under your name and image, which could go viral, get picked up by local media, seen by employer, friends, kids' school officials, and get picked up by Google's search results for the rest of your life. It's just comedy, sweetie. Lighten up.

That’s not what they did. Your brain’s analogy detector is broken.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This all seems like a well-organized campaign to muddy up Elon and twitter to promote other social media startups. It's pretty obvious NY Times is all-in on astroturfing new social media.

Someone should look up these rival platforms’ investors. Exploiting the situation by promoting platforms they’ve invested in would be the exact thing these parasitic rags would do under the guise of “social justice.”

Bingo.

Mastodon has been there for years and intentionally is set up to be nothing like Twitter. People are leaving Twitter because Elon is ruining it for them. They don’t want all troll all the time. There’s no conspiracy unless Elon and the Saudis are it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This all seems like a well-organized campaign to muddy up Elon and twitter to promote other social media startups. It's pretty obvious NY Times is all-in on astroturfing new social media.

Someone should look up these rival platforms’ investors. Exploiting the situation by promoting platforms they’ve invested in would be the exact thing these parasitic rags would do under the guise of “social justice.”

Bingo.

Oh please. There's the projection angle and then there's just nutter silliness. You're well into the latter territory now.

Yeah, hedge funds and private equity giants behind a new social media start-up would never conspire to make tens of billion of dollars.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember last week when Elon said: “Comedy had returned to Twitter”?

LOL

He’s so thin skinned.

The Left [now] considers identity theft, viral disinformation, smearing innocent people, libel, and slander to be "comedy"? Um, okay. Count me out.

That’s hilarious. You’re as funny as Elon.

Maybe I should lift your name and LinkedIn profile photo, create a twitter account, and tweet crazy "funny" things under your name and image, which could go viral, get picked up by local media, seen by employer, friends, kids' school officials, and get picked up by Google's search results for the rest of your life. It's just comedy, sweetie. Lighten up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This all seems like a well-organized campaign to muddy up Elon and twitter to promote other social media startups. It's pretty obvious NY Times is all-in on astroturfing new social media.

Someone should look up these rival platforms’ investors. Exploiting the situation by promoting platforms they’ve invested in would be the exact thing these parasitic rags would do under the guise of “social justice.”

Bingo.

Oh please. There's the projection angle and then there's just nutter silliness. You're well into the latter territory now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This all seems like a well-organized campaign to muddy up Elon and twitter to promote other social media startups. It's pretty obvious NY Times is all-in on astroturfing new social media.

Someone should look up these rival platforms’ investors. Exploiting the situation by promoting platforms they’ve invested in would be the exact thing these parasitic rags would do under the guise of “social justice.”

Bingo.