Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How will it go ? By Tuesday Barrett will be Justice Barrett.

Yep. And when your daughter has a miscarriage - and they won't be able to extract the fetal tissue. She will die a miserable death. And you will remember your excitement over this nomination - and a part of you will hate yourself.

You are one sick puppy. This isn’t going to happen. Stop the fear-mongering. It’s truly repulsive.
DP

You realize Judge Barret has no issue with criminalizing abortions, right?

This is absolute BS and you know it. Provide a specific link that proves your ridiculous claim.

“Since 1973 Democrats have been scaring American voters that every Republican Supreme Court nominee would overturn Roe v. Wade, and here we are nearly 50 years later and Roe v. Wade is still intact," said Mike Davis, president of the Article III Project, a group that supports Trump's nominees.

"Judge Barrett, someone who is clearly pro-life, has also clearly demonstrated on her three years on the 7th Circuit that she can separate her personal views from her judicial decision making," he said.

Overturning or otherwise limiting Roe v. Wade as much as possible has been the explicit platform of most of the Republican Party for about 40 years. They also are extremely disingenuous about it, as shown in the above quote. If she decides against Roe v. Wade, she will not say, "it's my personal opinion" and she will not say, "I can't change it, I am just an appellate judge," She will say, "Roe was wrongly decided, we reverse today because we can do that, Constitution blah, blah..." Roe has been intact for 50 years because there weren't 5 justices who had both the desire and legal (not personal) opinions to do it. Until today. And the states that want reversal are already lining up their cases.

Anonymous wrote:Wow, Barrett is starting work tomorrow.

where did you read that?
can you please link?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Only in Washington. The rest of the country is gearing up for Monday night football.

Nope.

The optics of this are as disgusting as Moscow Mitch’s rotting hands or Donald’s pumpkin colored face or Pence’s gleaming pink eye. Guess what? People actually have TVs and for some of us outside DC actually care more about what the GOP is doing to the country more than we care about some dumb game.

Anonymous wrote:Wow, Barrett is starting work tomorrow.

Of course she is. The GOP is bringing voter suppression lawsuits left and right. Justice Molly Pitcher has to be in place ASAP to limit the votes from the riff-raff, just as the Framers intended.

First up, the Pennsylvania GOP has refiled their challenge to the extended deadline for mail-in ballots. https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/10/pennsylvania-republicans-return-to-supreme-court-to-challenge-extended-deadline-for-mail-in-ballots/

Anonymous wrote:

Only in Washington. The rest of the country is gearing up for Monday night football.

Wow, Barrett is starting work tomorrow.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How will it go ? By Tuesday Barrett will be Justice Barrett.

Yep. And when your daughter has a miscarriage - and they won't be able to extract the fetal tissue. She will die a miserable death. And you will remember your excitement over this nomination - and a part of you will hate yourself.

You are one sick puppy. This isn’t going to happen. Stop the fear-mongering. It’s truly repulsive.
DP

You realize Judge Barret has no issue with criminalizing abortions, right?

This is absolute BS and you know it. Provide a specific link that proves your ridiculous claim.

“Since 1973 Democrats have been scaring American voters that every Republican Supreme Court nominee would overturn Roe v. Wade, and here we are nearly 50 years later and Roe v. Wade is still intact," said Mike Davis, president of the Article III Project, a group that supports Trump's nominees.

"Judge Barrett, someone who is clearly pro-life, has also clearly demonstrated on her three years on the 7th Circuit that she can separate her personal views from her judicial decision making," he said.

Actually, she has done no such thing. Her opinions from the bench exhibit a Venn coincidence of 1.0 with the comprehensive religious views of her People of Praise cult, which has issued “guidance” on every feature of public policy and private life. She does not deviate from the “guidance” ever, to any degree, on any issue on which “guidance” has been issued. And her judicial opinions are as pedestrian as her very thin legal background and her brief, limited, unimpressive “career” in actual legal practice, most of which was spent working as a junior associate on Bush v Gore.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you people with all your chicken little and hyperbole nonsense should now that the problem we wish to prevent has already happened and that IMO the actions of the hospital in this article are illegal and I want legislators and judges who agree with me. I don't care if you think I'm an idiot. I vote. Full stop.

https://rewirenewsgroup.com/article/2019/09/25/miscarriage-catholic-hospital/

PS. I don't care what you think because i think you are lunatics if you don't think this is a problem.

I agree with you. This is horrific. I am pro-choice and I honestly do NOT believe Barrett poses any kind of risk in overturning Roe or in limiting abortion access. She has sworn an oath to fairly interpret the law. She has done that so far and I believe she will continue to do so.

The problem is originalist judicial philosophy. According this philosophy, the law is determined directly from the text of the Constitution and the implied rights that Roe was based on don't exist. So in her own mind, she can overturn Roe and be faithful to the law at the same time. I think Gorsuch, Alito, Thomas and Kavanaugh are on the same page. Roberts shares the philosophy, but seems less willing to go against past precedent.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you people with all your chicken little and hyperbole nonsense should now that the problem we wish to prevent has already happened and that IMO the actions of the hospital in this article are illegal and I want legislators and judges who agree with me. I don't care if you think I'm an idiot. I vote. Full stop.

https://rewirenewsgroup.com/article/2019/09/25/miscarriage-catholic-hospital/

PS. I don't care what you think because i think you are lunatics if you don't think this is a problem.

I agree with you. This is horrific. I am pro-choice and I honestly do NOT believe Barrett poses any kind of risk in overturning Roe or in limiting abortion access. She has sworn an oath to fairly interpret the law. She has done that so far and I believe she will continue to do so.

Well, then you are in for quite the surprise.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How will it go ? By Tuesday Barrett will be Justice Barrett.

Yep. And when your daughter has a miscarriage - and they won't be able to extract the fetal tissue. She will die a miserable death. And you will remember your excitement over this nomination - and a part of you will hate yourself.

You are one sick puppy. This isn’t going to happen. Stop the fear-mongering. It’s truly repulsive.
DP

You realize Judge Barret has no issue with criminalizing abortions, right?

This is absolute BS and you know it. Provide a specific link that proves your ridiculous claim.

“Since 1973 Democrats have been scaring American voters that every Republican Supreme Court nominee would overturn Roe v. Wade, and here we are nearly 50 years later and Roe v. Wade is still intact," said Mike Davis, president of the Article III Project, a group that supports Trump's nominees.

"Judge Barrett, someone who is clearly pro-life, has also clearly demonstrated on her three years on the 7th Circuit that she can separate her personal views from her judicial decision making," he said.

She was asked a number of times in interviews and the hearing to denounce it, and she wouldn't. Her lack of denial is quite a tell.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you people with all your chicken little and hyperbole nonsense should now that the problem we wish to prevent has already happened and that IMO the actions of the hospital in this article are illegal and I want legislators and judges who agree with me. I don't care if you think I'm an idiot. I vote. Full stop.

https://rewirenewsgroup.com/article/2019/09/25/miscarriage-catholic-hospital/

PS. I don't care what you think because i think you are lunatics if you don't think this is a problem.

I agree with you. This is horrific. I am pro-choice and I honestly do NOT believe Barrett poses any kind of risk in overturning Roe or in limiting abortion access. She has sworn an oath to fairly interpret the law. She has done that so far and I believe she will continue to do so.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How will it go ? By Tuesday Barrett will be Justice Barrett.

Yep. And when your daughter has a miscarriage - and they won't be able to extract the fetal tissue. She will die a miserable death. And you will remember your excitement over this nomination - and a part of you will hate yourself.

Offensive and cruel.

It’s also a guaranteed outcome of the christofascists get their way.

Nope.

Lol. Yeah, they’ll totally stop with just abortion. These chiseling bible dogs - who are loyal to no one but their whacky desires and beliefs and no Christian faith I know of - are gunning for women to be stripped of rights, except for a few conservative women who can be counted on to do as told so that people can always say “But Barrett! Of course women can be allowed to work outside the house if their husband says they may!”

Why do you think this nutbag is the nominee? Unqualified. Lied in her confirmation hearings. Terrible decisions (that rape one alone oughta curl your hair if you’re a human). Why do you think she is the nominee?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How will it go ? By Tuesday Barrett will be Justice Barrett.

Yep. And when your daughter has a miscarriage - and they won't be able to extract the fetal tissue. She will die a miserable death. And you will remember your excitement over this nomination - and a part of you will hate yourself.

You are one sick puppy. This isn’t going to happen. Stop the fear-mongering. It’s truly repulsive.
DP

You realize Judge Barret has no issue with criminalizing abortions, right?

This is absolute BS and you know it. Provide a specific link that proves your ridiculous claim.

“Since 1973 Democrats have been scaring American voters that every Republican Supreme Court nominee would overturn Roe v. Wade, and here we are nearly 50 years later and Roe v. Wade is still intact," said Mike Davis, president of the Article III Project, a group that supports Trump's nominees.

"Judge Barrett, someone who is clearly pro-life, has also clearly demonstrated on her three years on the 7th Circuit that she can separate her personal views from her judicial decision making," he said.

Anonymous wrote:All you people with all your chicken little and hyperbole nonsense should now that the problem we wish to prevent has already happened and that IMO the actions of the hospital in this article are illegal and I want legislators and judges who agree with me. I don't care if you think I'm an idiot. I vote. Full stop.

https://rewirenewsgroup.com/article/2019/09/25/miscarriage-catholic-hospital/

PS. I don't care what you think because i think you are lunatics if you don't think this is a problem.