There has been deliberate provocation and escalation toward violence by ICE and Trump's side. It's THEY who want riots and violence.

Just watch some of the hours of footage that keeps coming out. Here's a clip of one of Trump's goons randomly and indiscriminately shooting an Australian journalist with a non-lethal round for absolutely no reason.



There's absolutely no reason for them to do this, unless they WANT riots and violence. And they DO want riots and violence, in order to justify their extrajudicial authoritarian crackdown and seizing of power. These "riots" appear to have a ton of Trump wag-the-dog theater going on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Also, what's your defense of the ICE agents arresting immigrants at their immigration court appointments? You know, the process of getting citizenship the RIGHT WAY. The way that all you bootlickers said immigrants should do.

An immigration court appointment is not the same as a citizenship appointment. These are recent arrivals who could and should have been immediately removed, but Biden instead let them into the country on parole.
Trump administration has instead dropped the case, and with no case pending they turn into expedited removals. For expedited removals, there is no more due process required.

Np. If Biden let them in on parole, then they are simply doing what our government permitted them to do. You don’t have to agree with Biden’s decision, but according to your own words, they were allowed to be here. Why did Trump prioritize these people over the rapists and gang members he promised to go after? Simply to undo everything Biden has done?

Because no due process needs to be given. They are easy removals that require less resources.

MAGAs absolutely NEED to get this one key fact through your heads:

The Constitution guarantees due process for anyone on US soil. The Fifth Amendment says "no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." No PERSON. It DOES NOT say "no citizen" and it doesn't differentiate based on citizenship.

And this has been repeatedly reaffirmed by the Supreme Court, for example Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886), Zadvydas v. Davis (2001).

Stop saying "no due process" - you are completely, irrefutably wrong and you are trampling the Constitution when you say this.

Your issue isn’t due process, it’s ICE enforcing judicial removal orders. We see right through this. By the way expedited removal is also due process.

That is *not* what is happening in these mass ICE raids and detentions. The people being detained *have not* had their cases adjudicated and did not receive due process. And you know it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Also, what's your defense of the ICE agents arresting immigrants at their immigration court appointments? You know, the process of getting citizenship the RIGHT WAY. The way that all you bootlickers said immigrants should do.

An immigration court appointment is not the same as a citizenship appointment. These are recent arrivals who could and should have been immediately removed, but Biden instead let them into the country on parole.
Trump administration has instead dropped the case, and with no case pending they turn into expedited removals. For expedited removals, there is no more due process required.

Np. If Biden let them in on parole, then they are simply doing what our government permitted them to do. You don’t have to agree with Biden’s decision, but according to your own words, they were allowed to be here. Why did Trump prioritize these people over the rapists and gang members he promised to go after? Simply to undo everything Biden has done?

Because no due process needs to be given. They are easy removals that require less resources.

MAGAs absolutely NEED to get this one key fact through your heads:

The Constitution guarantees due process for anyone on US soil. The Fifth Amendment says "no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." No PERSON. It DOES NOT say "no citizen" and it doesn't differentiate based on citizenship.

And this has been repeatedly reaffirmed by the Supreme Court, for example Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886), Zadvydas v. Davis (2001).

Stop saying "no due process" - you are completely, irrefutably wrong and you are trampling the Constitution when you say this.

Your issue isn’t due process, it’s ICE enforcing judicial removal orders. We see right through this. By the way expedited removal is also due process.

So now you are telling us what we think and feel?

Anonymous wrote:Since they arrested the guy passing out face masks hopefully they will find out some of the groups funding the shitshow in LA.

People actually care about these issues. No funding needed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/06/11/deportation-ice-criminals-campaign-polling/

ICE detentions of people with no criminal records are up nearly 900 percent over the same period last year.

illegal immigration is a crime.

It's a misdemeanor the same as a speeding ticket.



Also, what's your defense of the ICE agents arresting immigrants at their immigration court appointments? You know, the process of getting citizenship the RIGHT WAY. The way that all you bootlickers said immigrants should do.

They are MAGA and proud to be terrible humans.

OK. Tell us.... what other laws is it ok to break?

Laws against.....
Theft? Petty larceny? Shoplifting? Assault? Murder?

Which laws are not important enough to enforce? Give us details.

If your child was critically injured and there was no emergency service nearby, would you drive the speed limit to get them to the nearest hospital? Or would you get them there as quickly as possible and deal with the legal consequences later?

OK. You have come up with an instance where one might break traffic laws. Although, most people would say wait for an ambulance or police because the last thing you would want to do is get into a traffic accident speeding down the road.
But, that is not a good example of why an illegal alien would break our laws and enter illegally.

The GOP controlled Supreme Court has ruled and affirmed that simply being in the country illegally is not in, and of itself, a crime. So you are starting with a false premise.

And, you know what the penalty is for entering or residing in the US illegally?
Deportation. Yep. That is what they said.

How about working here illegally? Both Melania and Elon did it.

Anonymous wrote:Since they arrested the guy passing out face masks hopefully they will find out some of the groups funding the shitshow in LA.

You.

It’s you, the taxpayer, funding this $134M political theater.

There, I saved you the time.

Anonymous wrote:Ice should be spending its time and energy in the states that voted for Mass deportations. Red State voters want action in their own States close to their own homes. I don't think they're paying taxes to have their own states ignored.

💯

Democrats-"Biden messed up on immigration. That is all on him. Biden is gone now. Do not blame Democrats for Biden's mess.'
Also Democrats- 'No attempt should be made to undo Biden's mess'.

Anonymous wrote:

The Constitution guarantees due process for anyone on US soil. The Fifth Amendment says "no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." No PERSON. It DOES NOT say "no citizen" and it doesn't differentiate based on citizenship.

And this has been repeatedly reaffirmed by the Supreme Court, for example Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886), Zadvydas v. Davis (2001).

Stop saying "no due process" - you are completely, irrefutably wrong and you are trampling the Constitution when you say this.

That Constitution due process claim is about criminal prosecution. Your first court case is about laundry regulations being used in a discriminatory fashion against Chinese, and not relevant to due process or immigration. The second was about illegal immigrants cannot be held more than six months in detention if other countries won't take them.

The issue here is that if someone came in to the country illegally in the last two years, they can be deported without any hearings in immigration court.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Also, what's your defense of the ICE agents arresting immigrants at their immigration court appointments? You know, the process of getting citizenship the RIGHT WAY. The way that all you bootlickers said immigrants should do.

An immigration court appointment is not the same as a citizenship appointment. These are recent arrivals who could and should have been immediately removed, but Biden instead let them into the country on parole.
Trump administration has instead dropped the case, and with no case pending they turn into expedited removals. For expedited removals, there is no more due process required.

Np. If Biden let them in on parole, then they are simply doing what our government permitted them to do. You don’t have to agree with Biden’s decision, but according to your own words, they were allowed to be here. Why did Trump prioritize these people over the rapists and gang members he promised to go after? Simply to undo everything Biden has done?

Because no due process needs to be given. They are easy removals that require less resources.

MAGAs absolutely NEED to get this one key fact through your heads:

The Constitution guarantees due process for anyone on US soil. The Fifth Amendment says "no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." No PERSON. It DOES NOT say "no citizen" and it doesn't differentiate based on citizenship.

And this has been repeatedly reaffirmed by the Supreme Court, for example Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886), Zadvydas v. Davis (2001).

Stop saying "no due process" - you are completely, irrefutably wrong and you are trampling the Constitution when you say this.

Your issue isn’t due process, it’s ICE enforcing judicial removal orders. We see right through this. By the way expedited removal is also due process.

LOL, thanks for the 'splainer, Vlad.

Anonymous wrote:Since they arrested the guy passing out face masks hopefully they will find out some of the groups funding the shitshow in LA.

Walmart.

Anonymous wrote:Since they arrested the guy passing out face masks hopefully they will find out some of the groups funding the shitshow in LA.

Jeffery Soros. He’s the west coast funder.

Since they arrested the guy passing out face masks hopefully they will find out some of the groups funding the shitshow in LA.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Also, what's your defense of the ICE agents arresting immigrants at their immigration court appointments? You know, the process of getting citizenship the RIGHT WAY. The way that all you bootlickers said immigrants should do.

An immigration court appointment is not the same as a citizenship appointment. These are recent arrivals who could and should have been immediately removed, but Biden instead let them into the country on parole.
Trump administration has instead dropped the case, and with no case pending they turn into expedited removals. For expedited removals, there is no more due process required.

Np. If Biden let them in on parole, then they are simply doing what our government permitted them to do. You don’t have to agree with Biden’s decision, but according to your own words, they were allowed to be here. Why did Trump prioritize these people over the rapists and gang members he promised to go after? Simply to undo everything Biden has done?

Because no due process needs to be given. They are easy removals that require less resources.

MAGAs absolutely NEED to get this one key fact through your heads:

The Constitution guarantees due process for anyone on US soil. The Fifth Amendment says "no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." No PERSON. It DOES NOT say "no citizen" and it doesn't differentiate based on citizenship.

And this has been repeatedly reaffirmed by the Supreme Court, for example Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886), Zadvydas v. Davis (2001).

Stop saying "no due process" - you are completely, irrefutably wrong and you are trampling the Constitution when you say this.

Yes the whole uneducated, unskilled, illiterate economic migrant poor and needy world knows all those USA loopholes and exploits them. Gracias times 30 million.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Also, what's your defense of the ICE agents arresting immigrants at their immigration court appointments? You know, the process of getting citizenship the RIGHT WAY. The way that all you bootlickers said immigrants should do.

An immigration court appointment is not the same as a citizenship appointment. These are recent arrivals who could and should have been immediately removed, but Biden instead let them into the country on parole.
Trump administration has instead dropped the case, and with no case pending they turn into expedited removals. For expedited removals, there is no more due process required.

Np. If Biden let them in on parole, then they are simply doing what our government permitted them to do. You don’t have to agree with Biden’s decision, but according to your own words, they were allowed to be here. Why did Trump prioritize these people over the rapists and gang members he promised to go after? Simply to undo everything Biden has done?

Because no due process needs to be given. They are easy removals that require less resources.

MAGAs absolutely NEED to get this one key fact through your heads:

The Constitution guarantees due process for anyone on US soil. The Fifth Amendment says "no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." No PERSON. It DOES NOT say "no citizen" and it doesn't differentiate based on citizenship.

And this has been repeatedly reaffirmed by the Supreme Court, for example Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886), Zadvydas v. Davis (2001).

Stop saying "no due process" - you are completely, irrefutably wrong and you are trampling the Constitution when you say this.

Your issue isn’t due process, it’s ICE enforcing judicial removal orders. We see right through this. By the way expedited removal is also due process.