Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz looks like obese Chris Farley in the “van down by the river skit”.

The left has been negging Trump for his weight but think Walz is charming.

he's skinnier than Trump.

Walz hovers around 250. Trump through the second half of his term in office up until around that 2022 photo was hovering around 300.

It's pretty clear that in 2024, he's probably been on one of the semaglutides (Ozempic, Wegovy, Zepbound, etc). Look at the sagginess in the face and the double chin. Probably handlers thought he would do better if he lost weight. Since there was a lot or argument about fitness between Trump and Biden. Looks like he's lost about 40ish lbs, so they're probably close in weight now, with Trump still slightly heavier.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz looks like obese Chris Farley in the “van down by the river skit”.

The left has been negging Trump for his weight but think Walz is charming.

he's skinnier than Trump.

Walz hovers around 250. Trump through the second half of his term in office up until around that 2022 photo was hovering around 300.

It's pretty clear that in 2024, he's probably been on one of the semaglutides (Ozempic, Wegovy, Zepbound, etc). Look at the sagginess in the face and the double chin. Probably handlers thought he would do better if he lost weight. Since there was a lot or argument about fitness between Trump and Biden. Looks like he's lost about 40ish lbs, so they're probably close in weight now, with Trump still slightly heavier.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz looks like obese Chris Farley in the “van down by the river skit”.

The left has been negging Trump for his weight but think Walz is charming.

he's skinnier than Trump.

WHY IS HE SO WEIRD?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maga is in panic

Full blown. It's all trans in bathrooms and George Floyd/riots! That's all they got. Wait until they start hearing him speak! This is going to be delicious.

The riots and overall breakdown of law and order in our cities is where the Democrats are most vulnerable. Expect to hear about Kamala’s San Francisco and Tim’s Minneapolis nonstop for the next three months.

Did January 6th not happen? I don't understand how GOP are so concerned about some riots and not others. It's weird.

Bingo

All riots should be equally disdained regardless of the issue behind it because more often than not it's some nut job extremist thugs who don't actually care about the issue behind it....but as such should also be equally prosecuted and equally thought of as wrong regardless of the issue. It's never ok to destroy property regardless of the issue or topic period.

I agree. I read an article about The riots in MN and poor reaction time. Walz was very honest about it all and how it was not handled well. Now contrast that with Trump who still thinks January 6th was a good thing.

True - but I also know many Dems who think the BLM riots were a good thing too.

Dems supported the peaceful protests and criticized where the looting and property damage took place.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz looks like obese Chris Farley in the “van down by the river skit”.

The left has been negging Trump for his weight but think Walz is charming.

he's skinnier than Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What shouldn’t be lost in today’s news cycle is that the governor of a crucial swing state was humiliated by being skipped over for this nomination. And why? Because the anti-Israel activists in the party would have gone even more crazy due to Shapiro’s presence on the ticket. So don’t be at all surprised when the late night Philly magic doesn’t happen on election night.

Honey, you are so desperate. You have spent the entire day writing posts about Governor Shapiro as though he had been wronged. There were several people on that list. You don't care about them?

The Republicans are very upset that Harris went with the most magnetic and pragmatic choice and, after dropping hints it was going to be Shapiro, slapped the GOP around by not going with him. And after they spent all that time and money coming up with various antisemtic attacks and now they don’t get to use them!

DP. You seem very confused. The antisemitic attacks are coming from the left. Liberals have made it clear they didn’t want a Jewish person to be on the ticket. Just be honest, if you possibly can.

exactly

Right leaners are pro-Israel. Left leaners question our staunch support of Israel. Just look at how much aid Israel gets - especially from the U.S. Remember that w/o AIPAC backing, you're not a presidential candidate with a snowball's chance in hell.

Follow the money trail to the White House. Selecting a more progressive VP would be a death sentence for Harris.

I'm stating facts; I'm not an antisemite by any stretch of the imagination.

Anonymous wrote:Tim Walz took some damage In his 20 years as an artilleryman. Multiple ear surgeries. To be fair, JD Vance took some damage as well in his four years as a correspondent. Multiple paper cuts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tim Walz brought a hot dish to the party and said you can return the dish whenever.

He left the onions out because he knows that you’re allergic

Typical liberal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Is that the worst dirt you can get on this guy? A single DUI in 1995?

Oh, lots more will come out...... but *anything* from a candidate's past is fair game.
Those are the rules the liberals have set. Doesn't matter how long ago it happened.......

+1
The trolling over J.D. Vance’s innocuous past made it clear that absolutely nothing is off limits here.

+1. Who among us hasn’t made sweet love to a plush, velvety couch? Own up, people!

Anonymous wrote:

Walz vs Vance at same age

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Very interesting. I can’t wait to hear what the ahole who couldn’t stop criticizing Vance’s military service has to say about this. If I recall, that troll insisted that Vance only served as a resume builder and never saw combat. Looks like that describes Walz exactly. So we’re applying those same “standards” to Walz, right?

Sure. If someone says that Walz served "nobly," I'm going to want evidence that he did something noble. Merely doing your time in the military doesn't rise to that level. No shame - often enough, your period or mode of service doesn't give you much of an opportunity to do much more than your job. But people shouldn't oversell military service as more than what it is.

At least he and Vance served.

What is Trump's excuse?

"nobly" -- that's for his service as a high school teacher! :lol: