Anonymous
05/24/2023 14:35
Subject: Re:The Twitter Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure smoking crack is illegal. I also believe paying for prostitutes is illegal.
And, that gun he had in the pics? Illegally acquired.
What about 10% for the "big guy?"
Read anything written by anyone who looked into it.
Who proposed that to Hunter? Tony Bobulinski.
Did it happen? No. No Big Guy deal. No money. Nothing.
Your whole conspiracy is based on nothing.
It's in the emails. [/quote
Yeah no.
PP is correct. It is in the emails.
Mentions of those things in the laptop are just innuendo. They have to be proven with documents, testimony, and other evidence. Where is the legitimate evidence? Receiving an email proposal isn’t a crime.
They've revealed a number of LLCs transferring money around from Romania and China going to Biden family members. The existence of all these LLCs is evidence of hiding income, and possibly money laundering.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
05/13/2023 14:58
Subject: The Twitter Files
Anonymous wrote:so much for "no censorship"
[twitter]https://twitter.com/TheOmniLiberal/status/1657437148654477313[/tywitter]
as twitter censors the challenger in the Turkish elections, thus protecting the autocrat in power.
Twitter is censoring right and left.
I'm currently on day 16 of my "please allow 5 to 7 days for us to reinstate your account"
Anonymous
05/13/2023 14:56
Subject: Re:The Twitter Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure smoking crack is illegal. I also believe paying for prostitutes is illegal.
And, that gun he had in the pics? Illegally acquired.
What about 10% for the "big guy?"
Read anything written by anyone who looked into it.
Who proposed that to Hunter? Tony Bobulinski.
Did it happen? No. No Big Guy deal. No money. Nothing.
Your whole conspiracy is based on nothing.
It's in the emails. [/quote
Yeah no.
PP is correct. It is in the emails.
You mean the fake emails?
No. The ones that have been authenticated by such reputable groups as the WaPo and NYTimes.
The Washington Post on Wednesday became the second major news outlet to reverse course and admit that emails from the infamous H. Biden laptop are authentic — nine months after it obtained them and a year and a half after the New York Post first reported on them.
The paper said two security experts used cryptographic signatures from Google and other technology companies to validate nearly 22,000 emails from 2009 to 2019, including messages related to H. Biden’s controversial overseas business dealings.
Some verified emails involved a deal President Biden’s son pursued with the CEFC China Energy conglomerate for which he was paid nearly $5 million, according to the Washington Post.
Other verified emails related to his work for the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings, for which H. Biden was paid as much as $83,333 or a month, or $1 million a year.
Earlier this month, the New York Times said it had obtained emails that appeared to have come from the laptop and which were authenticated by people familiar with them and the federal tax probe of H. Biden that he publicly acknowledged in December 2020.
The Times buried its verification of the emails in the 24th paragraph of a 38-paragraph story that said H. Biden had paid off a significant tax debt to the IRS, potentially making it harder for prosecutors to win a conviction or a long sentence against him for tax fraud.
https://nypost.com/2022/03/30/washington-post-admits-h*****-biden-laptop-is-real/
https://reason.com/2022/03/17/the-new-york-times-belatedly-admits-the-emails-on-h*****-bidens-abandoned-laptop-are-real-and-newsworthy/
https://nypost.com/2022/04/01/new-york-times-finally-admit-hunters-laptop-is-real-but-only-to-protect-joe-biden/
Some emails were authenticated. But just because some emails were authenticated, that does not mean ALL emails were authenticated - as some of the other emails were never authenticated by anyone, some have clear signs of being forgeries or plants, and then there are others, like the one that specifically said "10 for the big guy" were only ever "authenticated" by Tony Bobulinski, and involved strange, sketchy screen shots of an iPhone which were photographed displayed on a Blackberry connected to a Russian cellphone provider - and this happened at the exact same time that Bobulinski mysteriously found $600k that got him out of the financial hardship of a fraud settlement he was court-ordered to pay. And Bobulinski has refused to answer any questions about the circumstances of any of that.
Anonymous
05/13/2023 14:21
Subject: The Twitter Files
so much for "no censorship"
[twitter]https://twitter.com/TheOmniLiberal/status/1657437148654477313[/tywitter]
as twitter censors the challenger in the Turkish elections, thus protecting the autocrat in power.
[twitter]https://twitter.com/TheOmniLiberal/status/1657437148654477313[/tywitter]
as twitter censors the challenger in the Turkish elections, thus protecting the autocrat in power.
Anonymous
04/23/2023 21:11
Subject: Re:The Twitter Files
Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure smoking crack is illegal. I also believe paying for prostitutes is illegal.
And, that gun he had in the pics? Illegally acquired.
What about 10% for the "big guy?"
Read anything written by anyone who looked into it.
Who proposed that to Hunter? Tony Bobulinski.
Did it happen? No. No Big Guy deal. No money. Nothing.
Your whole conspiracy is based on nothing.
It's in the emails. [/quote
Yeah no.
PP is correct. It is in the emails.
Mentions of those things in the laptop are just innuendo. They have to be proven with documents, testimony, and other evidence. Where is the legitimate evidence? Receiving an email proposal isn’t a crime.
Anonymous
04/23/2023 21:09
Subject: Re:The Twitter Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure smoking crack is illegal. I also believe paying for prostitutes is illegal.
And, that gun he had in the pics? Illegally acquired.
What about 10% for the "big guy?"
Read anything written by anyone who looked into it.
Who proposed that to Hunter? Tony Bobulinski.
Did it happen? No. No Big Guy deal. No money. Nothing.
Your whole conspiracy is based on nothing.
It's in the emails. [/quote
Yeah no.
PP is correct. It is in the emails.
You mean the fake emails?
No. The ones that have been authenticated by such reputable groups as the WaPo and NYTimes.
The Washington Post on Wednesday became the second major news outlet to reverse course and admit that emails from the infamous H. Biden laptop are authentic — nine months after it obtained them and a year and a half after the New York Post first reported on them.
The paper said two security experts used cryptographic signatures from Google and other technology companies to validate nearly 22,000 emails from 2009 to 2019, including messages related to H. Biden’s controversial overseas business dealings.
Some verified emails involved a deal President Biden’s son pursued with the CEFC China Energy conglomerate for which he was paid nearly $5 million, according to the Washington Post.
Other verified emails related to his work for the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings, for which H. Biden was paid as much as $83,333 or a month, or $1 million a year.
Earlier this month, the New York Times said it had obtained emails that appeared to have come from the laptop and which were authenticated by people familiar with them and the federal tax probe of H. Biden that he publicly acknowledged in December 2020.
The Times buried its verification of the emails in the 24th paragraph of a 38-paragraph story that said H. Biden had paid off a significant tax debt to the IRS, potentially making it harder for prosecutors to win a conviction or a long sentence against him for tax fraud.
https://nypost.com/2022/03/30/washington-post-admits-h*****-biden-laptop-is-real/
https://reason.com/2022/03/17/the-new-york-times-belatedly-admits-the-emails-on-h*****-bidens-abandoned-laptop-are-real-and-newsworthy/
https://nypost.com/2022/04/01/new-york-times-finally-admit-hunters-laptop-is-real-but-only-to-protect-joe-biden/
Anonymous
04/23/2023 20:57
Subject: Re:The Twitter Files
Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure smoking crack is illegal. I also believe paying for prostitutes is illegal.
And, that gun he had in the pics? Illegally acquired.
What about 10% for the "big guy?"
Read anything written by anyone who looked into it.
Who proposed that to Hunter? Tony Bobulinski.
Did it happen? No. No Big Guy deal. No money. Nothing.
Your whole conspiracy is based on nothing.
It's in the emails. [/quote
Yeah no.
PP is correct. It is in the emails.
You mean the fake emails?
Anonymous
04/23/2023 20:50
Subject: Re:The Twitter Files
I'm pretty sure smoking crack is illegal. I also believe paying for prostitutes is illegal.
And, that gun he had in the pics? Illegally acquired.
PP is correct. It is in the emails.
And, that gun he had in the pics? Illegally acquired.
What about 10% for the "big guy?"
Read anything written by anyone who looked into it.
Who proposed that to Hunter? Tony Bobulinski.
Did it happen? No. No Big Guy deal. No money. Nothing.
Your whole conspiracy is based on nothing.
It's in the emails. [/quote
Yeah no.
PP is correct. It is in the emails.
Anonymous
04/23/2023 20:50
Subject: The Twitter Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is a logical conclusion that any laptop or hard drive that was given to Rudy Giuliani and then later given by Giuliani to the FBI has probably had files added, deleted, and modified before it was given to Giuliani and again after it was given to Giuliani. Giuliani’s possession and intervention taints the evidence even if no Russians were involved. The FBI and the journalists investigating couldn’t accept the laptop as ironclad proof so they searched for other evidence that would verify the laptop. They didn’t find any evidence of anything illegal.
The FBI had the original laptop in 2019. They KNEW that the laptop was authentic.
Your premise is wrong.
And, yes... there were illegal activities documented on the laptop.
What illegal activities were “documented” on the laptop and why is there no evidence of it except on the laptop?
I'm pretty sure smoking crack is illegal. I also believe paying for prostitutes is illegal.
And, that gun he had in the pics? Illegally acquired.
What about 10% for the "big guy?"
Read anything written by anyone who looked into it.
Who proposed that to Hunter? Tony Bobulinski.
Did it happen? No. No Big Guy deal. No money. Nothing.
Your whole conspiracy is based on nothing.
It's in the emails.
JFC. Do a tiny bit of research. The 10% thing was a question in an email from grifter Bobulinski to Hunter. No Biden proposed it or agreed to it. It didn’t happen.
Anonymous
04/23/2023 19:39
Subject: The Twitter Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is a logical conclusion that any laptop or hard drive that was given to Rudy Giuliani and then later given by Giuliani to the FBI has probably had files added, deleted, and modified before it was given to Giuliani and again after it was given to Giuliani. Giuliani’s possession and intervention taints the evidence even if no Russians were involved. The FBI and the journalists investigating couldn’t accept the laptop as ironclad proof so they searched for other evidence that would verify the laptop. They didn’t find any evidence of anything illegal.
The FBI had the original laptop in 2019. They KNEW that the laptop was authentic.
Your premise is wrong.
And, yes... there were illegal activities documented on the laptop.
What illegal activities were “documented” on the laptop and why is there no evidence of it except on the laptop?
I'm pretty sure smoking crack is illegal. I also believe paying for prostitutes is illegal.
And, that gun he had in the pics? Illegally acquired.
What about 10% for the "big guy?"
Read anything written by anyone who looked into it.
Who proposed that to Hunter? Tony Bobulinski.
Did it happen? No. No Big Guy deal. No money. Nothing.
Your whole conspiracy is based on nothing.
It's in the emails. [/quote
Yeah no.