Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The latest Princeton Review is out. Look at the top regional colleges. Generally they make good safeties.
But are they liberal arts colleges?
USNews has its updated rankings for best liberal arts colleges, so you can look further down on the list for ideas of safeties:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-liberal-arts-colleges
DD applied to top ranking SLACs (and ended up going to one) but also selected a couple of safeties that happened to be in the 60s the year she applied. Got in to both with merit aid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The latest Princeton Review is out. Look at the top regional colleges. Generally they make good safeties.
But are they liberal arts colleges?
Anonymous wrote:The latest Princeton Review is out. Look at the top regional colleges. Generally they make good safeties.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are in MD and he is going to apply to UMD but isn’t sure that a large school is a good fit.
I've been haunting college discussion boards for longer than I care to admit and the most painful LAC threads are:
1. Are there any urban LACs?
2. Are there any warm weather LACs?
They're painful not because there are NO answers - Macalester is urban ,Eckerd is warm - but because the question betrays a fundamental naievete about the LAC game. Basically, if you aren't prepared for cold weather in the boondocks, you shouldn't be playing it. You may find onsies twinsies that aren't cold and rural, but you'll never put together an optional portfolio of schools to apply to and be happy with it.
So, brace for St. Olaf or go for even lower ranked schools down South. That's your son's choice. Or, make the easy call and apply to Towson to get the safety out of the way and move into other decisions.
Towson or St. Mary's if he wants smaller.
Was just going to suggest St. Marys. DC's couselor went there and highly recommended it. Muhlenberg is DC's likely. The visit really wowed us. DC is applying to mostly top LACs, some ivies, Northwestern, umd and umich. But, it's good to have a likely you like in addition to umd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are in MD and he is going to apply to UMD but isn’t sure that a large school is a good fit.
I've been haunting college discussion boards for longer than I care to admit and the most painful LAC threads are:
1. Are there any urban LACs?
2. Are there any warm weather LACs?
They're painful not because there are NO answers - Macalester is urban ,Eckerd is warm - but because the question betrays a fundamental naievete about the LAC game. Basically, if you aren't prepared for cold weather in the boondocks, you shouldn't be playing it. You may find onsies twinsies that aren't cold and rural, but you'll never put together an optional portfolio of schools to apply to and be happy with it.
So, brace for St. Olaf or go for even lower ranked schools down South. That's your son's choice. Or, make the easy call and apply to Towson to get the safety out of the way and move into other decisions.
Towson or St. Mary's if he wants smaller.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are in MD and he is going to apply to UMD but isn’t sure that a large school is a good fit.
I've been haunting college discussion boards for longer than I care to admit and the most painful LAC threads are:
1. Are there any urban LACs?
2. Are there any warm weather LACs?
They're painful not because there are NO answers - Macalester is urban ,Eckerd is warm - but because the question betrays a fundamental naievete about the LAC game. Basically, if you aren't prepared for cold weather in the boondocks, you shouldn't be playing it. You may find onsies twinsies that aren't cold and rural, but you'll never put together an optional portfolio of schools to apply to and be happy with it.
So, brace for St. Olaf or go for even lower ranked schools down South. That's your son's choice. Or, make the easy call and apply to Towson to get the safety out of the way and move into other decisions.
Urban or urbanish -- Macalester, Rhodes, Hartford, Trinity, all of the Claremont Colleges, Beloit, Augustana (IL)
Anonymous wrote:+Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+3 I think there is some confusion about what a safety school is, especially in the current time.
A safety school is one that you are extremely likely to be admitted - like at least 70% and for some up to 99% (there is no 100 of course).
That is partially a measure of your credentials compared to typical admits, but also a measure of the school's process - which of course is never fully known.
Just an example, Miami of Ohio received 26,844 applications (from 2020-2021 common data set). They admitted 24,684, over 90%.
So we know they are not highly selective, and we likely know that if your credentials compare favorably to their typical applicant, you are highly likely to be admitted. They also have a low ultimate yield, because they had 3800 enrollments from that 24,684 admitted number.
That is a safety school for a lot of people.
Tulane at 9% or even 15% admittance rate is not a typical safety. It may be for very high achieving students, but for most it is not a guaranteed admittance.
Plus, keep in mind that an AO can also sniff out if they think a student is serious about attending, right? What if they perceive your non-early RD application as over-qualified and might reject to protect their yield? So even on the highest end you are not guaranteed anything.
Tulane has been perhaps the most aggressive school out there at drumming up applications so they can lower their acceptance rate. They send postcards to people with a pulse.
My kid with a 2.8 and 22 ACT has been getting inundated with stuff from Tulane.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wooster might go along with that list.Anonymous wrote:We toured Lawrence, Macalester and St. Olaf. DS liked St. Olaf but not the other two. Still looking for more targets and safeties.
Did you read the original post?
Anonymous wrote:Wooster might go along with that list.Anonymous wrote:We toured Lawrence, Macalester and St. Olaf. DS liked St. Olaf but not the other two. Still looking for more targets and safeties.
Anonymous wrote:Wooster might go along with that list.[/quoteAnonymous wrote:We toured Lawrence, Macalester and St. Olaf. DS liked St. Olaf but not the other two. Still looking for more targets and safeties.
Yes. We there too but DS doesn’t seem interested enough to apply.
Wooster might go along with that list.Anonymous wrote:We toured Lawrence, Macalester and St. Olaf. DS liked St. Olaf but not the other two. Still looking for more targets and safeties.