Anonymous wrote:For Racine it’s either now or never.
Anonymous wrote:For Racine it’s either now or never.
Anonymous wrote:First of all, the race of the next mayor is not important, nor is their political affiliation if they can manage. What is frustrating is that as much as dc residents complain, they pay NO attention to their politicians, they don't give to campaigns and they are armchair pundits. The developers give all of the money so Bowser doesn't have to listen to anyone else. It's so frustrating.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bowser is only part of the problem. We have a city council full of left wing nut jobs these days. The big picture of city leadership is painfully depressing.
See, this is a problem. If you keep harping on left wing vs. right wing and we don't acknowledge the money/corruption vs. people split then the money/corruption will always win.
What's really the difference between genuine people left/right? I think many approaches could be merged if we're working towards the same ultimate goals. Especially socially liberal conservatives in DC.
Anonymous wrote:Bowser is only part of the problem. We have a city council full of left wing nut jobs these days. The big picture of city leadership is painfully depressing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can we get a competent political moderate? I'm so pessimistic about the way our city is headed, and it's so painful to admit this because I've sunk all my resources here over two decades only to see DC slide back into garbage.
This is how I feel, exactly. I am going on 20 years in the city and am more frustrated than I have ever been. It isn't just crime, but minor annoyances are increasing and making it more time-consuming to live here. I am not ready for a conservative mayor, but a moderate or even independent would be welcome.
Is the complaint that Bowser is too liberal or too conservative?
I think she’s just corrupt and incompetent at running a city, but seemingly highly capable of playing politics to the detriment of everyone. Civic-minded non-ideological competence would be what would be hoped for in my view.
I am the PP and "Civic-minded non-ideological competence" is a good term.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She's like any politician: She sucks up to them when it's expedient for her to do so. Like, say, her push to add housing, which for Bowser is not being done for altruistic reasons but to line the pockets of the developers who are the main funders of her campaigns. Or Vision Zero, which has been a laughable failure that no one cares about anymore except for the same four people who populate the GGW comments section.
The 5 year old girl at 14 and Irving NE who was fatally struck and killed by a driver certainly cared about Vision Zero. Amazing how many dead bodies drivers are willing to pile up just to ensure they can operate with total impunity on DC streets.
Anonymous wrote:
2. Well timed lights so you don’t get mown down when crossing streets
Anonymous wrote:She's like any politician: She sucks up to them when it's expedient for her to do so. Like, say, her push to add housing, which for Bowser is not being done for altruistic reasons but to line the pockets of the developers who are the main funders of her campaigns. Or Vision Zero, which has been a laughable failure that no one cares about anymore except for the same four people who populate the GGW comments section.