Anonymous
Post 09/06/2023 12:43     Subject: Brookeville bypass wasn't needed

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This was a waste of money


Complete and total waste of money spearheaded by a former state legislator who wanted to make it easier to back out of her driveway onto Georgia Ave.


This is a rumor and not true at all


Says who?

I live in Brookeville btw. It's a pretty small town and people talk.

Regardless, the bypass ripped through woodland to avoid roughly a dozen houses owned by people who knew what they were getting into when they bought their homes on Georgia Ave. Making the case that it was all of a sudden too busy in the small town was a bit much. It isn't a town; it's a dozen+ houses. We rerouted traffic for the benefit of a ridiculously small amount of people. Why? The speed limit is very low and traffic is controlled by a stop sign at the only intersection. What was the issue? Big trucks? Guess what? There are steps that could have been taken to ban tractor trailers on a portion of the road. They could have opted to reroute big trucks. Instead they opted to reroute all traffic...and that begs the question, "Why?"

Because a former state legislator wanted to back out of her driveway on Georgia Ave.

Many millions of dollars later, we have a completely unnecessary major road cut through woodland. The impact on the local community center and adjacent field is a tragedy. BTW, why does the community center have such limited hours and limited activities? Ridiculous.
Anonymous
Post 09/06/2023 12:35     Subject: Brookeville bypass wasn't needed

Why aren't we building a bypass around Washington DC, yet we can build this useless crap around a village
Anonymous
Post 09/06/2023 12:34     Subject: Brookeville bypass wasn't needed

Anonymous wrote:I still maintain this wasn't needed and the fact its a one lane road and not two in each direction with interchanges is a travesty.


Get a life
Anonymous
Post 09/06/2023 12:34     Subject: Brookeville bypass wasn't needed

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This was a waste of money


Complete and total waste of money spearheaded by a former state legislator who wanted to make it easier to back out of her driveway onto Georgia Ave.


This is a rumor and not true at all
Anonymous
Post 09/06/2023 12:25     Subject: Brookeville bypass wasn't needed

There is a short leg of Brookeville road that is still closed. You can also see it on street view in Google maps. When will it be complete? Will it be paved again because it seems like they are waiting for another coat.
Anonymous
Post 09/01/2023 19:19     Subject: Brookeville bypass wasn't needed

Anonymous wrote:This was a waste of money


Complete and total waste of money spearheaded by a former state legislator who wanted to make it easier to back out of her driveway onto Georgia Ave.
Anonymous
Post 08/30/2023 20:54     Subject: Brookeville bypass wasn't needed

This was a waste of money
Anonymous
Post 08/29/2023 11:16     Subject: Brookeville bypass wasn't needed

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:THe bypass has been opened


It’s open but it’s not complete.


But it is complete


No, it’s not. There’s part that is unfinished and the road looks like it’s waiting for another coat of asphalt.
Anonymous
Post 08/28/2023 21:25     Subject: Brookeville bypass wasn't needed

I still maintain this wasn't needed and the fact its a one lane road and not two in each direction with interchanges is a travesty.
Anonymous
Post 08/28/2023 18:52     Subject: Brookeville bypass wasn't needed

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:THe bypass has been opened


It’s open but it’s not complete.


But it is complete
Anonymous
Post 08/28/2023 13:48     Subject: Brookeville bypass wasn't needed

Anonymous wrote:THe bypass has been opened


It’s open but it’s not complete.
Anonymous
Post 08/27/2023 17:38     Subject: Brookeville bypass wasn't needed

THe bypass has been opened
Anonymous
Post 08/27/2023 14:56     Subject: Brookeville bypass wasn't needed

Does anyone know when the Brookeville bypass will be completed? It’s still under construction.
Anonymous
Post 06/01/2023 14:05     Subject: Brookeville bypass wasn't needed

Anonymous wrote:It's open, it's lovely and it was absolutely needed.

Now the town and the creek is not at risk for flooding, and the historic town can be persevered, and safe from idiots going 50+ through 90 degree turns.




Could the flooding have been fixed without constructing the bypass?

Anonymous
Post 06/01/2023 14:02     Subject: Brookeville bypass wasn't needed

Brookeville is a quaint spot along the road but I won't miss the tight turns and curves.