Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But back to the topic at hand, I'd rank OLV first choice, Little Flower #2, HT far #3.
How would you rank them against nearby MCPS, FCPS, APS schools?
NP here. I have friends/family at all schools listed above. This is how I would rank -
1) HT
2) APS
3) LF
4) FCPS
5) OLV
6) MCPS (only ranked last because of the large class sizes)
scratching my head on HT as #1. Not known for great academics or facilities, or a welcoming community. Super location and church overall, but as a school…. Meh.
Another vote for OLV. Great academics, diverse and welcoming to new families. The facilities are not great.
The facilities are horrible at OLV. The kids play in a parking lot. There literally is no playground at all.
They play in the street at HTS.
The lower school children have a secure courtyard with a basketball court and play equipment. The upper school children sometimes use the courtyard and have a section of a street that is blocked off.
Yes, I decided not to apply when I saw the dirty blocked street and the small classrooms. It's a school crying for renovation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But back to the topic at hand, I'd rank OLV first choice, Little Flower #2, HT far #3.
How would you rank them against nearby MCPS, FCPS, APS schools?
NP here. I have friends/family at all schools listed above. This is how I would rank -
1) HT
2) APS
3) LF
4) FCPS
5) OLV
6) MCPS (only ranked last because of the large class sizes)
scratching my head on HT as #1. Not known for great academics or facilities, or a welcoming community. Super location and church overall, but as a school…. Meh.
Another vote for OLV. Great academics, diverse and welcoming to new families. The facilities are not great.
The facilities are horrible at OLV. The kids play in a parking lot. There literally is no playground at all.
They play in the street at HTS.
The lower school children have a secure courtyard with a basketball court and play equipment. The upper school children sometimes use the courtyard and have a section of a street that is blocked off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But back to the topic at hand, I'd rank OLV first choice, Little Flower #2, HT far #3.
How would you rank them against nearby MCPS, FCPS, APS schools?
NP here. I have friends/family at all schools listed above. This is how I would rank -
1) HT
2) APS
3) LF
4) FCPS
5) OLV
6) MCPS (only ranked last because of the large class sizes)
scratching my head on HT as #1. Not known for great academics or facilities, or a welcoming community. Super location and church overall, but as a school…. Meh.
Another vote for OLV. Great academics, diverse and welcoming to new families. The facilities are not great.
The facilities are horrible at OLV. The kids play in a parking lot. There literally is no playground at all.
They play in the street at HTS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But back to the topic at hand, I'd rank OLV first choice, Little Flower #2, HT far #3.
How would you rank them against nearby MCPS, FCPS, APS schools?
NP here. I have friends/family at all schools listed above. This is how I would rank -
1) HT
2) APS
3) LF
4) FCPS
5) OLV
6) MCPS (only ranked last because of the large class sizes)
scratching my head on HT as #1. Not known for great academics or facilities, or a welcoming community. Super location and church overall, but as a school…. Meh.
Another vote for OLV. Great academics, diverse and welcoming to new families. The facilities are not great.
The facilities are horrible at OLV. The kids play in a parking lot. There literally is no playground at all.