Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is in the weeds, but who would you want to replace Feinstein?

Katie Porter!

YES! Especially since the House has now shut her out of the Financial Services Committee.

They didn't 'shut' her out. She put a list of her top three committees together and put Financial Services dead-last. Knowing that a) its a committee that requires you to only serve on it alone, and b) getting either of her top two choices, let alone both, meant she couldn't serve on two committees let alone three.

It was a poor move.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is in the weeds, but who would you want to replace Feinstein?

Katie Porter!

YES! Especially since the House has now shut her out of the Financial Services Committee.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is in the weeds, but who would you want to replace Feinstein?

Katie Porter!

Yep. I'm with her as my #2 and Karen Bass as my #1 as she's been representing CA in Congress for 10 years.

Anonymous wrote:This is in the weeds, but who would you want to replace Feinstein?

Katie Porter!

OMG, she's completely lost it. WTF.

This is in the weeds, but who would you want to replace Feinstein?

Anonymous wrote:8:00AM 01/21/21. Great day to announce your retirement.

I'm assuming she will wait until later this year. Newsome being able to choose an two Senators, Attorney General, and a Secretary of State within a month and a half would seem like a powergrab. Hate these circumstances because she needs to go.

Too late for that. The party needs to go to her and to Gov. Newsome and intervene.

Anonymous wrote:8:00AM 01/21/21. Great day to announce your retirement.

She needs to be primaries. She has definitely lost her mind.

8:00AM 01/21/21. Great day to announce your retirement.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously?

Calm down. She has to file that paperwork because of $$$.

Oh thank god.

So say she has $5 million and all her campaign expenses are paid -- can she give that all to the next Democrat candidate who wins the primary?

Is that often done for candidates who lose? For instance - Amy McGrath and Jaime Harrison should be sitting on $50 million each.

Yeah, when a candidate loses or wins, they likely have a remaining warchest. Thats why so many people who lose start PACs. All the major orgs, DNC, DSCC, DLCC, will want a cut and the candidate will also give to others campaigns

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously?

Calm down. She has to file that paperwork because of $$$.

Oh thank god.

So say she has $5 million and all her campaign expenses are paid -- can she give that all to the next Democrat candidate who wins the primary?

Is that often done for candidates who lose? For instance - Amy McGrath and Jaime Harrison should be sitting on $50 million each.

Anonymous wrote:Seriously?

Calm down. She has to file that paperwork because of $$$.

Seriously?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She should resign right after Biden's inauguration with a nice ceremony and recognition of her accomplishments.

It is very sad that it's at this point, but it is and it's not going to get better.

Gavin Newsom is going to have a blast with all the appointments.

Yep.

Two Senators.

One Attorney General.

One Secretary of State.

It is going to be difficult because with such a slim House majority, it'll be hard to pluck democratic reps.

Um, there are plenty of safe California blue districts where a Dem will assuredly win any special election.

Karen Bass's seat would be safe, but they might not want to lose her in the House.