Anonymous wrote:Thanks to everyone for all this good info. I should have indicated that my husband does have a pension, but the lump amount was included in the $881K figure. The pension monthly estimate at 65 is $10K provided he keeps putting in at the same amount we have been now. And I think the health care costs are supposed to be partially covered in retirement, though I know our portion of the premium will go up. My apologies for not being more clear. I really appreciate the info, though, and think we should be putting more in. I don't think we need the full HHI that we have now, but we were thinking we'd rent out our house here and move somewhere else. We have EU citizenship so that's a dream plan to live in Italy or Ireland, but not sure we'll have enough nerve to actually do that.
To the poster who noted that posting on DCUM is an anxiety wish, you're probably right. I always think it will be interesting to hear perspectives, and have to then remind myself of the vast differences in perspectives, some will make me feel great, others like garbage and wonder where we went so wrong. I think we're all just doing the best we can, no matter how much we make, and we need to not be so hard on ourselves, while still trying to secure our financial future. Thanks all.
Anonymous wrote:I always feel that DCUM oversaves
I don't get why people need over 100k in retirement. For most people SS almost gets you halfway there. And SS isn't going away, the age might go up and benefits might slightly decrease but most people should be expecting at least 2500 a month if they are working
Main point being 1-3 million retirement account fund at age 60-65 is plenty.
Some realistic benchmarks 1 million at 55
500k at 45
250k at 35
Anonymous wrote:This is a dumb question. On dcum, it turns into a pissing match and everyone on here seems to have $1+ million by late 20s/30s, which is an absolute farce.
Median numbers are easily searchable. Your avg American has way less than $200k by their 40s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DH is early 40s and has 350k, I'm mid 30s and have 500k. I feel we are a bit behind...
Probably better than us, 350k for me (about to turn 40), ~250k for my spouse (mid-40s). Also have almost 200k in home equity. I started investing early but I wasn't able to put much in for a long while - have only had the means to max out my TSP for the last 4-5 years.
I should be getting a federal pension as well, which will help at least.
You're not doing all that bad. Think about it: if everything goes to plan, you'll work another 25 years. And the last 15 you can contribute a lot more to 401ks and IRAs. You see people on this board with $3 million, $5 million, heck $7 million in assets. This is the top 1% of America. You don't need 5 million dollars to have an enjoyable retirement. That is, unless your idea of "enjoyable retirement" is skiing in the Alps and spending summers in the Italian countryside, dining out at 5-star restaurants and leaving your kids multi-million dollar trust funds. But I'd imagine that's not how you're living now. If you can pay off your home, you'll have your pension and plenty of retirement savings to live a really nice life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just used a retirement calculator available online and it said that we need to save $1,330 per month for retirement based on what we have saved now. We are beating that significantly annualized. It expects that we will need 9M to retire! That seems overly optimistic and a bit nuts. I feel like you can drive yourself crazy with these calculators, esp. if you are under age 40.
Garbage in, garbage out.
You did not put in accurate numbers if you got $9M out. Unless you have multiple homes and expect to need a ton of disposable income.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a dumb question. On dcum, it turns into a pissing match and everyone on here seems to have $1+ million by late 20s/30s, which is an absolute farce.
Median numbers are easily searchable. Your avg American has way less than $200k by their 40s.
Not in this area. OP will struggle with what she has.
Except you'd have to be a moron to stay in this area during retirement.
Why? If your house is already paid for when you retire, your housing expense will be limited to taxes + utilities. Not much different than anywhere else, considering there are many parts of the country with property tax rates higher than DC metro. Most retirees aren't heading out to the pricey trendy bars and restaurants. If you can afford it, DC is a great place to be a retiree - tons of free cultural activities that you can take advantage of when you have time on your hands.
There are states where there are 0% taxes on retirement account withdrawals or 0% income taxes. Plus done states have other perks like reduced property taxes, lower rates for insurance on basically everything, and much lower cost of living overall. Paying 0% income tax on 401k income is huge amounts of money to consider. It isn't worth it at all to stay in this region in retirement to pay 3x sticker price on everything just to have access to amenities and a job market you no longer need.
Where is that?
Here you go: https://www.kiplinger.com/slideshow/retirement/t054-s001-taxes-in-retirement-how-all-50-states-tax-retirees/index.html
Well, there's 0 state tax occasionally, often made up by higher sales or income taxes in places, but of course there's still federal which is the far bigger tax issue.
The best states for retirees have special rules for retirement income & property tax for seniors. States like Texas, with zero income tax for everyone, but high property taxes, are not good for retirees. However, a state that, for example, does not tax pensions, waives state property tax for seniors and has very low property tax, would be really good. You need to read the fine print.
Actually Texas has an over-65 Homestead exemption that keeps property taxes in check for seniors.
The freeze on property taxes at 65 doesn’t help if you move in from somewhere else. There is an additional reduction, but it varies from place to place & generally doesn’t offset How high the taxes are to begin with (unless you’re moving in from somewhere like Westchester County, in which case, they may not look so bad).
Texas doesn't tax Social Security benefits, pensions, 401ks, IRAs or any other retirement income. And the housing costs are very affordable. It's not the cheapest state to retire in, due to the property taxes, but it's better than most of America.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a dumb question. On dcum, it turns into a pissing match and everyone on here seems to have $1+ million by late 20s/30s, which is an absolute farce.
Median numbers are easily searchable. Your avg American has way less than $200k by their 40s.
Not in this area. OP will struggle with what she has.
Except you'd have to be a moron to stay in this area during retirement.
Why? If your house is already paid for when you retire, your housing expense will be limited to taxes + utilities. Not much different than anywhere else, considering there are many parts of the country with property tax rates higher than DC metro. Most retirees aren't heading out to the pricey trendy bars and restaurants. If you can afford it, DC is a great place to be a retiree - tons of free cultural activities that you can take advantage of when you have time on your hands.
There are states where there are 0% taxes on retirement account withdrawals or 0% income taxes. Plus done states have other perks like reduced property taxes, lower rates for insurance on basically everything, and much lower cost of living overall. Paying 0% income tax on 401k income is huge amounts of money to consider. It isn't worth it at all to stay in this region in retirement to pay 3x sticker price on everything just to have access to amenities and a job market you no longer need.
Where is that?
Here you go: https://www.kiplinger.com/slideshow/retirement/t054-s001-taxes-in-retirement-how-all-50-states-tax-retirees/index.html
Well, there's 0 state tax occasionally, often made up by higher sales or income taxes in places, but of course there's still federal which is the far bigger tax issue.
The best states for retirees have special rules for retirement income & property tax for seniors. States like Texas, with zero income tax for everyone, but high property taxes, are not good for retirees. However, a state that, for example, does not tax pensions, waives state property tax for seniors and has very low property tax, would be really good. You need to read the fine print.
Actually Texas has an over-65 Homestead exemption that keeps property taxes in check for seniors.
The freeze on property taxes at 65 doesn’t help if you move in from somewhere else. There is an additional reduction, but it varies from place to place & generally doesn’t offset How high the taxes are to begin with (unless you’re moving in from somewhere like Westchester County, in which case, they may not look so bad).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DH is early 40s and has 350k, I'm mid 30s and have 500k. I feel we are a bit behind...
Probably better than us, 350k for me (about to turn 40), ~250k for my spouse (mid-40s). Also have almost 200k in home equity. I started investing early but I wasn't able to put much in for a long while - have only had the means to max out my TSP for the last 4-5 years.
I should be getting a federal pension as well, which will help at least.
Anonymous wrote:DH is early 40s and has 350k, I'm mid 30s and have 500k. I feel we are a bit behind...