Anonymous
04/13/2024 12:22
Subject: How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
WRONG.
"Persistent rumors that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia over the election became the catnip that drove reporting. At NPR, we hitched our wagon to Trump’s most visible antagonist, Representative Adam Schiff.
Schiff, who was the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, became NPR’s guiding hand, its ever-present muse. By my count, NPR hosts interviewed Schiff 25 times about Trump and Russia. During many of those conversations, Schiff alluded to purported evidence of collusion. The Schiff talking points became the drumbeat of NPR news reports.
But when the Mueller report found no credible evidence of collusion, NPR’s coverage was notably sparse. Russiagate quietly faded from our programming. "
https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust
Uri Berliner is a senior business editor and reporter at NPR.
You really need new sources of information. The one you keep relying on and posting here is simply not accurate.
Actually, you need more well versed and rounded news sources. But you don't seek them out, do you?
Anonymous
04/13/2024 11:07
Subject: How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:
WRONG.
"Persistent rumors that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia over the election became the catnip that drove reporting. At NPR, we hitched our wagon to Trump’s most visible antagonist, Representative Adam Schiff.
Schiff, who was the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, became NPR’s guiding hand, its ever-present muse. By my count, NPR hosts interviewed Schiff 25 times about Trump and Russia. During many of those conversations, Schiff alluded to purported evidence of collusion. The Schiff talking points became the drumbeat of NPR news reports.
But when the Mueller report found no credible evidence of collusion, NPR’s coverage was notably sparse. Russiagate quietly faded from our programming. "
https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust
Uri Berliner is a senior business editor and reporter at NPR.
You really need new sources of information. The one you keep relying on and posting here is simply not accurate.
Anonymous
04/13/2024 10:23
Subject: How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I mean, we are trying to combat our enemies. Herridge was spreading disinformation that originated with Russia, and she did it unquestioningly.
If we really consider russia an enemy and need to stem the flow of actual "fake news" then it has to start somewhere.
Or are you fine with Russian psyops against the people of the USA?
What's your next move? A Department of Homeland Security "Disinformation Governance Board" to attack anything the DNC doesn't agree with? Oh.......wait.
“I feel so attacked when you won’t let my political tribe spread foreign adversarial propaganda!”
Right? I’m oppressed! Where’s my free speech?! lol
Anonymous
04/13/2024 09:55
Subject: How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I mean, we are trying to combat our enemies. Herridge was spreading disinformation that originated with Russia, and she did it unquestioningly.
If we really consider russia an enemy and need to stem the flow of actual "fake news" then it has to start somewhere.
Or are you fine with Russian psyops against the people of the USA?
What's your next move? A Department of Homeland Security "Disinformation Governance Board" to attack anything the DNC doesn't agree with? Oh.......wait.
“I feel so attacked when you won’t let my political tribe spread foreign adversarial propaganda!”
Hunter Biden Laptop not a Russian op?
51 "Intelligence Experts" say what?
Russia collusion not collusion after all?
WRONG.
"Persistent rumors that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia over the election became the catnip that drove reporting. At NPR, we hitched our wagon to Trump’s most visible antagonist, Representative Adam Schiff.
Schiff, who was the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, became NPR’s guiding hand, its ever-present muse. By my count, NPR hosts interviewed Schiff 25 times about Trump and Russia. During many of those conversations, Schiff alluded to purported evidence of collusion. The Schiff talking points became the drumbeat of NPR news reports.
But when the Mueller report found no credible evidence of collusion, NPR’s coverage was notably sparse. Russiagate quietly faded from our programming. "
https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust
Uri Berliner is a senior business editor and reporter at NPR.
Anonymous
04/13/2024 09:50
Subject: Re:How neutral is Catherine Herridge
"Back in 2011, although NPR’s audience tilted a bit to the left, it still bore a resemblance to America at large. Twenty-six percent of listeners described themselves as conservative, 23 percent as middle of the road, and 37 percent as liberal.
By 2023, the picture was completely different: only 11 percent described themselves as very or somewhat conservative, 21 percent as middle of the road, and 67 percent of listeners said they were very or somewhat liberal. We weren’t just losing conservatives; we were also losing moderates and traditional liberals.
An open-minded spirit no longer exists within NPR, and now, predictably, we don’t have an audience that reflects America. "
https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust
By 2023, the picture was completely different: only 11 percent described themselves as very or somewhat conservative, 21 percent as middle of the road, and 67 percent of listeners said they were very or somewhat liberal. We weren’t just losing conservatives; we were also losing moderates and traditional liberals.
An open-minded spirit no longer exists within NPR, and now, predictably, we don’t have an audience that reflects America. "
https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust
Anonymous
04/13/2024 09:40
Subject: How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:She seems too neutral. There is no room for neutrality in journalism today. She’s outdated.
Yes, gotta go with NPR. They're fair and balanced.
I’ve Been at NPR for 25 Years. Here’s How We Lost America’s Trust.
https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust
NPR in Turmoil After It Is Accused of Liberal Bias
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/11/business/media/npr-criticism-liberal-bias.html
NPR defends its journalism after senior editor says it has lost the public's trust
https://www.npr.org/2024/04/09/1243755769/npr-journalist-uri-berliner-trust-diversity
NPR faces right-wing revolt and calls for defunding after editor claims left-wing bias
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/npr-faces-right-wing-revolt-and-calls-for-defunding-after-editor-claims-left-wing-bias/ar-BB1lrQtO
Anonymous
04/12/2024 22:22
Subject: How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I mean, we are trying to combat our enemies. Herridge was spreading disinformation that originated with Russia, and she did it unquestioningly.
If we really consider russia an enemy and need to stem the flow of actual "fake news" then it has to start somewhere.
Or are you fine with Russian psyops against the people of the USA?
What's your next move? A Department of Homeland Security "Disinformation Governance Board" to attack anything the DNC doesn't agree with? Oh.......wait.
“I feel so attacked when you won’t let my political tribe spread foreign adversarial propaganda!”
Hunter Biden Laptop not a Russian op?
51 "Intelligence Experts" say what?
Russia collusion not collusion after all?
Anonymous
04/12/2024 21:50
Subject: How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I mean, we are trying to combat our enemies. Herridge was spreading disinformation that originated with Russia, and she did it unquestioningly.
If we really consider russia an enemy and need to stem the flow of actual "fake news" then it has to start somewhere.
Or are you fine with Russian psyops against the people of the USA?
What's your next move? A Department of Homeland Security "Disinformation Governance Board" to attack anything the DNC doesn't agree with? Oh.......wait.
“I feel so attacked when you won’t let my political tribe spread foreign adversarial propaganda!”
Hunter Biden Laptop not a Russian op?
51 "Intelligence Experts" say what?
Russia collusion not collusion after all?
Anonymous
04/12/2024 09:07
Subject: How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I mean, we are trying to combat our enemies. Herridge was spreading disinformation that originated with Russia, and she did it unquestioningly.
If we really consider russia an enemy and need to stem the flow of actual "fake news" then it has to start somewhere.
Or are you fine with Russian psyops against the people of the USA?
What's your next move? A Department of Homeland Security "Disinformation Governance Board" to attack anything the DNC doesn't agree with? Oh.......wait.
“I feel so attacked when you won’t let my political tribe spread foreign adversarial propaganda!”
Anonymous
04/12/2024 08:46
Subject: How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I mean, we are trying to combat our enemies. Herridge was spreading disinformation that originated with Russia, and she did it unquestioningly.
If we really consider russia an enemy and need to stem the flow of actual "fake news" then it has to start somewhere.
Or are you fine with Russian psyops against the people of the USA?
What's your next move? A Department of Homeland Security "Disinformation Governance Board" to attack anything the DNC doesn't agree with? Oh.......wait.
When the "what I don't agree with" is literally made up fake stuff coming from our enemies to sow discord and divisiveness, then yes.
Adam Smith's "marketplace of ideas" was predicated on the ideas being based on truth. If we cannot even agree what 'truth' is, we have even bigger problems for our society.
Anonymous
04/12/2024 08:44
Subject: How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:I mean, we are trying to combat our enemies. Herridge was spreading disinformation that originated with Russia, and she did it unquestioningly.
If we really consider russia an enemy and need to stem the flow of actual "fake news" then it has to start somewhere.
Or are you fine with Russian psyops against the people of the USA?
What's your next move? A Department of Homeland Security "Disinformation Governance Board" to attack anything the DNC doesn't agree with? Oh.......wait.
Anonymous
04/12/2024 08:28
Subject: How neutral is Catherine Herridge
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I mean, we are trying to combat our enemies. Herridge was spreading disinformation that originated with Russia, and she did it unquestioningly.
If we really consider russia an enemy and need to stem the flow of actual "fake news" then it has to start somewhere.
Or are you fine with Russian psyops against the people of the USA?
No, she wasn't spreading disinformation. The only psyop is the Biden Regime waging war against anyone who disagrees with them... much like the FBI/DOJ paying tax payer dollars to social media outlets to censor opinions.
You democrats have really become tyrannical.
People like me posted about Herridge on the Durham/Barr thread. We warned that what she was writing about was disinformation. We were poo-poo'd on that thread.
We were right.
She wrote and repeated russian disinformation while working at CBS news. Sure, she may have sources, but those sources were feeding her lies, and she amplified them.