Anonymous wrote:Zoom is not approved for instruction in FCPS. Any FCPS teacher using it faces a reprimand.
Could you PLEASE lay off until the end of the week? FCPS has 190,000 students. They are doing the best that they can. Many teachers didn’t even have their *laptops* until principals allowed them back into the building for literally 10 minutes today. Buildings have been ordered closed. Instructional devices provided 2 weeks’ worth of work on Blackboard. Have you done it all? And if your child misses classmates so much, why don’t YOU organize a Zoom play date among children?
Anonymous wrote:Zoom is free but my children’s privacy matters more than anything. Teachers can send material but should not expect students and parents to post videos and pictures online.
Anonymous wrote:DP. I think that changed when the schools were closed for the rest of the year. I think that schools are working now to get some sort of distance learning started before spring break. But we'll see.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When you elect a bunch is social justice warriors to the school board - many of whom who don’t have children - this is the crap sandwich our kids receive. Bravo FCPS.
If it’s so hard to cope with your own children, perhaps you should have remained childless as well.
My beef is not with my kids. We have schedules, our own chromebooks, and a great situation. I'm just irritated about the people being paid to do nothing. So stop generalizing about that reason, and realize that we would like to see action because it's your JOBS. Many of us will lose our jobs. Also, this inaction now is going to make the mutual masturbation about how hard educators work even more unbearable during the next teacher appreciation week..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When you elect a bunch is social justice warriors to the school board - many of whom who don’t have children - this is the crap sandwich our kids receive. Bravo FCPS.
If it’s so hard to cope with your own children, perhaps you should have remained childless as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When you elect a bunch is social justice warriors to the school board - many of whom who don’t have children - this is the crap sandwich our kids receive. Bravo FCPS.
If it’s so hard to cope with your own children, perhaps you should have remained childless as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On the note of laptops for every kid, in almost all normal circumstances, the elementary kids should not be 1:1 with laptops.
Those should be an occassional activity, not a primary means of teaching.
That is why many of us voted against the meals tax. Early elementary students should not be looking at a screen all day. It is bad for their development.
Even in this quarantine situation, traditional paper work is better than laptops. I really hope fcps does not try to get 1:1 laptops for the little ones.
I teach third grade. We have no Chromebooks. I have 5 laptops in the classroom for 23 third graders. Each classroom has 5 computers (one classroom has 5 desktops). The grade level shares 2 mobile lab carts that hold 16 hand me down laptops (if they are available and not pulled for testing or the Global Awareness Project). That’s 62 computers (57 laptops) for approximately 145 students.
And that is how it should be.
Early elementsry kids should not be getting their education from compjters as a primary tool.
Computers should be used only occassionally in 4th grade.and below.
And this attitude is precisely why schools and students aren’t prepared to deal with a situation like this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On the note of laptops for every kid, in almost all normal circumstances, the elementary kids should not be 1:1 with laptops.
Those should be an occassional activity, not a primary means of teaching.
That is why many of us voted against the meals tax. Early elementary students should not be looking at a screen all day. It is bad for their development.
Even in this quarantine situation, traditional paper work is better than laptops. I really hope fcps does not try to get 1:1 laptops for the little ones.
I teach third grade. We have no Chromebooks. I have 5 laptops in the classroom for 23 third graders. Each classroom has 5 computers (one classroom has 5 desktops). The grade level shares 2 mobile lab carts that hold 16 hand me down laptops (if they are available and not pulled for testing or the Global Awareness Project). That’s 62 computers (57 laptops) for approximately 145 students.
And that is how it should be.
Early elementsry kids should not be getting their education from compjters as a primary tool.
Computers should be used only occassionally in 4th grade.and below.
Anonymous wrote:When you elect a bunch is social justice warriors to the school board - many of whom who don’t have children - this is the crap sandwich our kids receive. Bravo FCPS.