Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s the evident lack of durability, rather than aesthetics, that make McMansions so unsettling to me. I’d like to think that if I had several million to spend on a spec home, I’d choose materials that will last. I’d build something that could be passed to a future generation, even if it were small, rather than torn down and replaced with something equally transient.
I don't know, I see a lot to admire in the Japanese approach of tearing the whole thing down every 20 to 30 years and starting fresh. We in the US are too dependent on real estate appreciation and the concept of homes staying in the family.
That approach might’ve made sense when you were talking largely about wood construction without internal plumbing, ductwork, insulation, fixtures, and tons of plastic crap that is simply landfilled if it can’t be cheaply recycled. We are not living with bamboo-floored tatami mat houses anymore either here or in Japan (I’m Tokyo-born). Our building methods are grossly resource intensive and overly focused on what’s new or stylish.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s the evident lack of durability, rather than aesthetics, that make McMansions so unsettling to me. I’d like to think that if I had several million to spend on a spec home, I’d choose materials that will last. I’d build something that could be passed to a future generation, even if it were small, rather than torn down and replaced with something equally transient.
I don't know, I see a lot to admire in the Japanese approach of tearing the whole thing down every 20 to 30 years and starting fresh. We in the US are too dependent on real estate appreciation and the concept of homes staying in the family.
Anonymous wrote:It’s the evident lack of durability, rather than aesthetics, that make McMansions so unsettling to me. I’d like to think that if I had several million to spend on a spec home, I’d choose materials that will last. I’d build something that could be passed to a future generation, even if it were small, rather than torn down and replaced with something equally transient.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What we “Americans” consider tasteful, classic, etc is obviously not congruent with others, particularly others from diverse cultures. Im betting the people building these “mcmansions” likely are doing it because they find the existing, traditional American dwelling structures to be equally deficient and/or lacking.
100% Correct. If you travel abroad and how homes are built, you'll notice that American homes are actually quite cheap and ugly. They are made of wood, drywall; The exterior is just made of plastic (vinyl) or fake bricks. yuk. Even expensive homes are built with the same cheap wood, drywall and plastic. Everywhere else in the world, this is considered plain ugly, cheap and tasteless. But American love their homes like this.
Anonymous wrote:What we “Americans” consider tasteful, classic, etc is obviously not congruent with others, particularly others from diverse cultures. Im betting the people building these “mcmansions” likely are doing it because they find the existing, traditional American dwelling structures to be equally deficient and/or lacking.
Anonymous wrote:I dont have a dog in the race but reading through forum i deduce envy, jealousy, and a bit of immigrant resentment. I saw one comment (which was removed by the moderator) which was rather resentful and perhaps a bit hateful. What does it matter how people spend their $$ so as long as they earn it honestly to pursure their wants, desires, etc. Very sad to see people behave like teenagers...
Anonymous wrote:What we “Americans” consider tasteful, classic, etc is obviously not congruent with others, particularly others from diverse cultures. Im betting the people building these “mcmansions” likely are doing it because they find the existing, traditional American dwelling structures to be equally deficient and/or lacking.