Anonymous wrote:

Witholding congressionally authorized funds for personal gain is illegal on several fronts. Obama never did that.

His administration did.

For whose personal gain, exactly?

Witholding congressionally authorized funds for personal gain is illegal on several fronts. Obama never did that.

His administration did.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good:

https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/06/whistleblowers-attorney-targeted-trump-old-tweets/

By total coincidence, one of the many people who have tweeted stuff about Trump is the go-to whistleblower lawyer in the country. How about that?

Are you suggesting the Ukraine "thing" is a fabrication?

I’m suggesting that it’s blown beyond the point of recognition. Trump did what Obama did to Israel regarding foreign aid. Regarding him wanting to get to the bottom of Ukraine’s meddling for Clinton in 2016? I think it’s a valid pursuit. Biden would not even be a part of this had his son not been involved with Burisma and in the China dealings. Anyone with half a brain can see that he got those positions because of his father. Not a crime in itself - don’t really care - but any liberal who thinks Biden got those positions because of his credentials is smoking too much DC weed.

Witholding congressionally authorized funds for personal gain is illegal on several fronts. Obama never did that.

Neither did Trump

You clearly haven't read the transcripts of the testimony given to date, if you honestly believe that.

I don’t suck up the testimony of people who have proven their loyalties lie with the Democratic Party, Clinton, Obama, etc.

Oh my gosh. This in a nutshell is what is wrong with this country.

DP. Honest question here...Is there any email/recording/memo etc where Trump says that the reason the funds were withheld, was to get the Ukrainians to investigate Biden?

Yes. He said "Talk to Rudy" and Rudy will tell you the details about what you need to investigate. And that is prefaced by him saying the U.S. has done plenty for Ukraine, and Ukraine owes him a favor before he will do anything else. Trump himself is too stupid to understand or remember the details of the conspiracy theories so he cannot articulate exactly what he wants investigated. He simplifies and exaggerates everything into good guys (sycophants) and bad guys (everybody else), so all he can say without a written script is that Biden talked to some bad people in Ukraine (anti-corruption reformers), and the good (corrupt) prosecutor was fired, and our woman ambassador was bad news (because she represented U.S. policy), and other simple-minded and Trump-centered statements in favor of the corrupt quid pro quo he was requesting.

Trump never coherently lays out the criminal plot in one sentence because he is too stupid to form that sentence, but his clear and obvious instruction, repeated several times, was for Zelensky to talk to Giuliani and do what Giuliani tells him to do.

That is all backed up a dozen or more times by Taylor, Volker, Sondland, Mulvaney, Giuliani, Sullivan, Vindman, Fiona Hill, and others that the money was being held up by Trump himself and that to get it, Ukraine had to issue a public statement about investigating 2016 and the Bidens that satisfied Rudy Giuliani. Volker and Sondland were helping to draft the statement. None of this is disputable on any factual basis.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good:

https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/06/whistleblowers-attorney-targeted-trump-old-tweets/

By total coincidence, one of the many people who have tweeted stuff about Trump is the go-to whistleblower lawyer in the country. How about that?

Are you suggesting the Ukraine "thing" is a fabrication?

I’m suggesting that it’s blown beyond the point of recognition. Trump did what Obama did to Israel regarding foreign aid. Regarding him wanting to get to the bottom of Ukraine’s meddling for Clinton in 2016? I think it’s a valid pursuit. Biden would not even be a part of this had his son not been involved with Burisma and in the China dealings. Anyone with half a brain can see that he got those positions because of his father. Not a crime in itself - don’t really care - but any liberal who thinks Biden got those positions because of his credentials is smoking too much DC weed.

Witholding congressionally authorized funds for personal gain is illegal on several fronts. Obama never did that.

Neither did Trump

You clearly haven't read the transcripts of the testimony given to date, if you honestly believe that.

I don’t suck up the testimony of people who have proven their loyalties lie with the Democratic Party, Clinton, Obama, etc.

Oh my gosh. This in a nutshell is what is wrong with this country.

DP. Honest question here...Is there any email/recording/memo etc where Trump says that the reason the funds were withheld, was to get the Ukrainians to investigate Biden?

In the summary of the “perfect” call, Trump mentions Bidens three times and says nothing about “corruption.”

Beyond the following?

1. The transcript, where Zelensky asks for military aid and Trump says "I need you to do me a favor, though" and then asks Zelensky to investigate Biden.

2. Sondland saying he told the Ukrainians the aid was withheld until they agreed to investigate Biden. (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/05/us/politics/impeachment-trump.html)

3. Bolton telling Fiona Hill, "I'm not part of whatever drug deal Sondland and Mulvaney are cooking up."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good:

https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/06/whistleblowers-attorney-targeted-trump-old-tweets/

By total coincidence, one of the many people who have tweeted stuff about Trump is the go-to whistleblower lawyer in the country. How about that?

Are you suggesting the Ukraine "thing" is a fabrication?

I’m suggesting that it’s blown beyond the point of recognition. Trump did what Obama did to Israel regarding foreign aid. Regarding him wanting to get to the bottom of Ukraine’s meddling for Clinton in 2016? I think it’s a valid pursuit. Biden would not even be a part of this had his son not been involved with Burisma and in the China dealings. Anyone with half a brain can see that he got those positions because of his father. Not a crime in itself - don’t really care - but any liberal who thinks Biden got those positions because of his credentials is smoking too much DC weed.

Witholding congressionally authorized funds for personal gain is illegal on several fronts. Obama never did that.

Neither did Trump

You clearly haven't read the transcripts of the testimony given to date, if you honestly believe that.

I don’t suck up the testimony of people who have proven their loyalties lie with the Democratic Party, Clinton, Obama, etc.

Oh my gosh. This in a nutshell is what is wrong with this country.

DP. Honest question here...Is there any email/recording/memo etc where Trump says that the reason the funds were withheld, was to get the Ukrainians to investigate Biden?

Read the sworn testimony of the people involved, including those who were on the 'perfect' call.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good:

https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/06/whistleblowers-attorney-targeted-trump-old-tweets/

By total coincidence, one of the many people who have tweeted stuff about Trump is the go-to whistleblower lawyer in the country. How about that?

Are you suggesting the Ukraine "thing" is a fabrication?

I’m suggesting that it’s blown beyond the point of recognition. Trump did what Obama did to Israel regarding foreign aid. Regarding him wanting to get to the bottom of Ukraine’s meddling for Clinton in 2016? I think it’s a valid pursuit. Biden would not even be a part of this had his son not been involved with Burisma and in the China dealings. Anyone with half a brain can see that he got those positions because of his father. Not a crime in itself - don’t really care - but any liberal who thinks Biden got those positions because of his credentials is smoking too much DC weed.

Witholding congressionally authorized funds for personal gain is illegal on several fronts. Obama never did that.

Neither did Trump

You clearly haven't read the transcripts of the testimony given to date, if you honestly believe that.

I don’t suck up the testimony of people who have proven their loyalties lie with the Democratic Party, Clinton, Obama, etc.

So the only people you listen to are Giuliani and Mulvaney, and you ignore their words. Since they've said there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal gain.

Got it.

As has Sondland, whose loyalties lie with Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good:

https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/06/whistleblowers-attorney-targeted-trump-old-tweets/

By total coincidence, one of the many people who have tweeted stuff about Trump is the go-to whistleblower lawyer in the country. How about that?

Are you suggesting the Ukraine "thing" is a fabrication?

I’m suggesting that it’s blown beyond the point of recognition. Trump did what Obama did to Israel regarding foreign aid. Regarding him wanting to get to the bottom of Ukraine’s meddling for Clinton in 2016? I think it’s a valid pursuit. Biden would not even be a part of this had his son not been involved with Burisma and in the China dealings. Anyone with half a brain can see that he got those positions because of his father. Not a crime in itself - don’t really care - but any liberal who thinks Biden got those positions because of his credentials is smoking too much DC weed.

Witholding congressionally authorized funds for personal gain is illegal on several fronts. Obama never did that.

Neither did Trump

You clearly haven't read the transcripts of the testimony given to date, if you honestly believe that.

I don’t suck up the testimony of people who have proven their loyalties lie with the Democratic Party, Clinton, Obama, etc.

Oh my gosh. This in a nutshell is what is wrong with this country.

DP. Honest question here...Is there any email/recording/memo etc where Trump says that the reason the funds were withheld, was to get the Ukrainians to investigate Biden?

In the summary of the “perfect” call, Trump mentions Bidens three times and says nothing about “corruption.”

That doesn't answer my question.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good:

https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/06/whistleblowers-attorney-targeted-trump-old-tweets/

By total coincidence, one of the many people who have tweeted stuff about Trump is the go-to whistleblower lawyer in the country. How about that?

Are you suggesting the Ukraine "thing" is a fabrication?

I’m suggesting that it’s blown beyond the point of recognition. Trump did what Obama did to Israel regarding foreign aid. Regarding him wanting to get to the bottom of Ukraine’s meddling for Clinton in 2016? I think it’s a valid pursuit. Biden would not even be a part of this had his son not been involved with Burisma and in the China dealings. Anyone with half a brain can see that he got those positions because of his father. Not a crime in itself - don’t really care - but any liberal who thinks Biden got those positions because of his credentials is smoking too much DC weed.

Witholding congressionally authorized funds for personal gain is illegal on several fronts. Obama never did that.

Neither did Trump

You clearly haven't read the transcripts of the testimony given to date, if you honestly believe that.

I don’t suck up the testimony of people who have proven their loyalties lie with the Democratic Party, Clinton, Obama, etc.

Oh my gosh. This in a nutshell is what is wrong with this country.

DP. Honest question here...Is there any email/recording/memo etc where Trump says that the reason the funds were withheld, was to get the Ukrainians to investigate Biden?

In the summary of the “perfect” call, Trump mentions Bidens three times and says nothing about “corruption.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, the Dems have been trying since day 1 to get Trump impeached. They have not done any work to help citizens of this country. So, when Trump wins again, are they going to keep trying for another 4 years to impeach him costing taxpayers millions of dollars.

People are realizing what shyt show the Dems are. I am hoping some are you are halfway smart to see this.

Hmm. But at least we only hear about Hillary and her emails every other day instead of how it would have been had she been elected.

wow you still defending Hillary and all the shenanigans she has pulled. You are naive, very naive

NP.

A report on activity is very different from exclusion of information that the American public had a right to. Infringing upon that right is my concern. We ALL get a vote.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good:

https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/06/whistleblowers-attorney-targeted-trump-old-tweets/

By total coincidence, one of the many people who have tweeted stuff about Trump is the go-to whistleblower lawyer in the country. How about that?

Are you suggesting the Ukraine "thing" is a fabrication?

I’m suggesting that it’s blown beyond the point of recognition. Trump did what Obama did to Israel regarding foreign aid. Regarding him wanting to get to the bottom of Ukraine’s meddling for Clinton in 2016? I think it’s a valid pursuit. Biden would not even be a part of this had his son not been involved with Burisma and in the China dealings. Anyone with half a brain can see that he got those positions because of his father. Not a crime in itself - don’t really care - but any liberal who thinks Biden got those positions because of his credentials is smoking too much DC weed.

Witholding congressionally authorized funds for personal gain is illegal on several fronts. Obama never did that.

Neither did Trump

You clearly haven't read the transcripts of the testimony given to date, if you honestly believe that.

I don’t suck up the testimony of people who have proven their loyalties lie with the Democratic Party, Clinton, Obama, etc.

Willfully obtuse. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good:

https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/06/whistleblowers-attorney-targeted-trump-old-tweets/

By total coincidence, one of the many people who have tweeted stuff about Trump is the go-to whistleblower lawyer in the country. How about that?

Are you suggesting the Ukraine "thing" is a fabrication?

I’m suggesting that it’s blown beyond the point of recognition. Trump did what Obama did to Israel regarding foreign aid. Regarding him wanting to get to the bottom of Ukraine’s meddling for Clinton in 2016? I think it’s a valid pursuit. Biden would not even be a part of this had his son not been involved with Burisma and in the China dealings. Anyone with half a brain can see that he got those positions because of his father. Not a crime in itself - don’t really care - but any liberal who thinks Biden got those positions because of his credentials is smoking too much DC weed.

Witholding congressionally authorized funds for personal gain is illegal on several fronts. Obama never did that.

Neither did Trump

You clearly haven't read the transcripts of the testimony given to date, if you honestly believe that.

I don’t suck up the testimony of people who have proven their loyalties lie with the Democratic Party, Clinton, Obama, etc.

Oh my gosh. This in a nutshell is what is wrong with this country.

DP. Honest question here...Is there any email/recording/memo etc where Trump says that the reason the funds were withheld, was to get the Ukrainians to investigate Biden?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good:

https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/06/whistleblowers-attorney-targeted-trump-old-tweets/

By total coincidence, one of the many people who have tweeted stuff about Trump is the go-to whistleblower lawyer in the country. How about that?

Are you suggesting the Ukraine "thing" is a fabrication?

I’m suggesting that it’s blown beyond the point of recognition. Trump did what Obama did to Israel regarding foreign aid. Regarding him wanting to get to the bottom of Ukraine’s meddling for Clinton in 2016? I think it’s a valid pursuit. Biden would not even be a part of this had his son not been involved with Burisma and in the China dealings. Anyone with half a brain can see that he got those positions because of his father. Not a crime in itself - don’t really care - but any liberal who thinks Biden got those positions because of his credentials is smoking too much DC weed.

Witholding congressionally authorized funds for personal gain is illegal on several fronts. Obama never did that.

Neither did Trump

You clearly haven't read the transcripts of the testimony given to date, if you honestly believe that.

I don’t suck up the testimony of people who have proven their loyalties lie with the Democratic Party, Clinton, Obama, etc.

So the only people you listen to are Giuliani and Mulvaney, and you ignore their words. Since they've said there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal gain.

Got it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good:

https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/06/whistleblowers-attorney-targeted-trump-old-tweets/

By total coincidence, one of the many people who have tweeted stuff about Trump is the go-to whistleblower lawyer in the country. How about that?

Are you suggesting the Ukraine "thing" is a fabrication?

I’m suggesting that it’s blown beyond the point of recognition. Trump did what Obama did to Israel regarding foreign aid. Regarding him wanting to get to the bottom of Ukraine’s meddling for Clinton in 2016? I think it’s a valid pursuit. Biden would not even be a part of this had his son not been involved with Burisma and in the China dealings. Anyone with half a brain can see that he got those positions because of his father. Not a crime in itself - don’t really care - but any liberal who thinks Biden got those positions because of his credentials is smoking too much DC weed.

Witholding congressionally authorized funds for personal gain is illegal on several fronts. Obama never did that.

Neither did Trump

You clearly haven't read the transcripts of the testimony given to date, if you honestly believe that.

I don’t suck up the testimony of people who have proven their loyalties lie with the Democratic Party, Clinton, Obama, etc.

Oh my gosh. This in a nutshell is what is wrong with this country.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good:

https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/06/whistleblowers-attorney-targeted-trump-old-tweets/

By total coincidence, one of the many people who have tweeted stuff about Trump is the go-to whistleblower lawyer in the country. How about that?

Are you suggesting the Ukraine "thing" is a fabrication?

I’m suggesting that it’s blown beyond the point of recognition. Trump did what Obama did to Israel regarding foreign aid. Regarding him wanting to get to the bottom of Ukraine’s meddling for Clinton in 2016? I think it’s a valid pursuit. Biden would not even be a part of this had his son not been involved with Burisma and in the China dealings. Anyone with half a brain can see that he got those positions because of his father. Not a crime in itself - don’t really care - but any liberal who thinks Biden got those positions because of his credentials is smoking too much DC weed.

Witholding congressionally authorized funds for personal gain is illegal on several fronts. Obama never did that.

Neither did Trump

You clearly haven't read the transcripts of the testimony given to date, if you honestly believe that.

I don’t suck up the testimony of people who have proven their loyalties lie with the Democratic Party, Clinton, Obama, etc.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good:

https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/06/whistleblowers-attorney-targeted-trump-old-tweets/

By total coincidence, one of the many people who have tweeted stuff about Trump is the go-to whistleblower lawyer in the country. How about that?

Are you suggesting the Ukraine "thing" is a fabrication?

I’m suggesting that it’s blown beyond the point of recognition. Trump did what Obama did to Israel regarding foreign aid. Regarding him wanting to get to the bottom of Ukraine’s meddling for Clinton in 2016? I think it’s a valid pursuit. Biden would not even be a part of this had his son not been involved with Burisma and in the China dealings. Anyone with half a brain can see that he got those positions because of his father. Not a crime in itself - don’t really care - but any liberal who thinks Biden got those positions because of his credentials is smoking too much DC weed.

Witholding congressionally authorized funds for personal gain is illegal on several fronts. Obama never did that.

Neither did Trump

You clearly haven't read the transcripts of the testimony given to date, if you honestly believe that.