Anonymous wrote:That’s a lot of phone numbers for Trump in Epstein’s address book.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does no one think that Epstein's injuries are the result of a failed mob "hit"? If not mob in the traditional sense, just someone who was paid to attack him?
He's in protective custody, in a cell by himself. He injured himself in a desperate attempt to be granted bail. He's opened a new can of worms for himself.
This. He was not trying to kill himself. Such privilege. His little ploys won’t fly with the judge, who by the way is trained social worker. He’s toast. My only hope is his clients are exposed. Of course they don’t need his words. What do you was on those DVDs?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does no one think that Epstein's injuries are the result of a failed mob "hit"? If not mob in the traditional sense, just someone who was paid to attack him?
He's in protective custody, in a cell by himself. He injured himself in a desperate attempt to be granted bail. He's opened a new can of worms for himself.
This. He was not trying to kill himself. Such privilege. His little ploys won’t fly with the judge, who by the way is trained social worker. He’s toast. My only hope is his clients are exposed. Of course they don’t need his words. What do you was on those DVDs?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does no one think that Epstein's injuries are the result of a failed mob "hit"? If not mob in the traditional sense, just someone who was paid to attack him?
He's in protective custody, in a cell by himself. He injured himself in a desperate attempt to be granted bail. He's opened a new can of worms for himself.
Anonymous wrote:Does no one think that Epstein's injuries are the result of a failed mob "hit"? If not mob in the traditional sense, just someone who was paid to attack him?
Anonymous wrote:Watching 2017 “You Were Never Really Here”. Eerily like Epstein situation just missing Saint Joaquin Phoenix with his hammer
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does no one think that Epstein's injuries are the result of a failed mob "hit"? If not mob in the traditional sense, just someone who was paid to attack him?
It's not far fetched to connect Tartaglione to the mob.
https://heavy.com/news/2016/12/nicholas-tartaglione-chester-new-york-police-officer-cop-murders-kills-four-men-drugs-photos/
some facts . . .
I mean that’s an insane case.
As not a criminal and not one who spends any time around criminals, is there ever a point at which a criminal is just like, “the jig is up. I may as well come clean” or is there still omertà among these losers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does no one think that Epstein's injuries are the result of a failed mob "hit"? If not mob in the traditional sense, just someone who was paid to attack him?
It's not far fetched to connect Tartaglione to the mob.
https://heavy.com/news/2016/12/nicholas-tartaglione-chester-new-york-police-officer-cop-murders-kills-four-men-drugs-photos/
some facts . . .
Anonymous wrote:Does no one think that Epstein's injuries are the result of a failed mob "hit"? If not mob in the traditional sense, just someone who was paid to attack him?