Anonymous
Post 07/06/2019 14:59     Subject: Non-Famous But Frequent Posters II

We can now add the Marie Reed racism troll to this pantheon:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/814694.page

I saw a few of them. The Jeff sniffed them out.
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2019 14:51     Subject: Non-Famous But Frequent Posters II

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The poster who claims his/her Thanksgiving spread for 20 costs $1,000 and that making a lasagna is an $80 enterprise.


It sound right to me.
The cheeses alone can be $50 when I make lasagna.

$1000 is easy to spend when you include alcohol.

How much do YOU spend on these things?

For a family of four, a basic weeknight lasagna costs me around 20 bucks, tops. Boxed noodles, jar sauce, mozarrella and ricotta from the grocery store dairy section. I suppose if I made one with fancy cheeses, meat, fresh pasta, etc. it could reach 80.

For the same family, a traditional Thanksgiving turkey dinner probably costs a couple hundred bucks, including alcohol and appetizers. It could reach $1,000 if we're hosting friends or extended family.
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2019 14:38     Subject: Non-Famous But Frequent Posters II

Right wingers who respond to even mild teasing with cries of "Liberal Intolerance!" and paranoid rants about how they're the REAL victims.

All while liberally (pun intended) throwing around terms such as "Libtard," DUMBocrat, etc.
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2019 14:32     Subject: Non-Famous But Frequent Posters II

Anonymous wrote:Bingo![/quote

God, I hate that one. I don't know why.
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2019 14:20     Subject: Non-Famous But Frequent Posters II

Food forum poster who brags her mother has Thanksgiving "down to a science."
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2019 13:26     Subject: Non-Famous But Frequent Posters II

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The anti- kate poster who monitors her work schedule on spreadsheets.


This is a weird fantasy. No such person exists. Not sure why you are so invested in a pretend person.



I didn’t know you took full accounting of every human on the planet to verify your statement as fact: that no such person exists. Should probably use that statistical data you gathered to update the research on marriage, divorce, outcome studies ...


You are the best. Please keep it up! You and your Kate stan friends are who make reading the royalty threads so entertaining.


I never frequent that forum, ever. I do think that both your group and the Kate stand are clearly recognizable though. It’s like left and right wig posters. Just know that the rest of us on DCUM, we see you too.


Probably not. I like both Kate and Meghan and you could find occasional posts from me praising a dress or a look of Kate's if you could look. But I am not a Kate stan -- the Kate stans who believe in magical spreadsheet lady and want to be Kate's best mom friend are the super entertaining ones. I think I am pretty boring in my posts. The most anti-Kate I post about is getting puzzled over Kate's deep attachment to collapsed bows on her clothes, which is truly a royal mystery. But I am definitely entertained by the stans!
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2019 13:25     Subject: Non-Famous But Frequent Posters II

Y'all, if Kate spreadsheet lady exists, just LINK to her threads!

I proved the existence of Burger King Lady; link up or shut up!

-OP
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2019 13:22     Subject: Non-Famous But Frequent Posters II

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The anti- kate poster who monitors her work schedule on spreadsheets.


This is a weird fantasy. No such person exists. Not sure why you are so invested in a pretend person.



I didn’t know you took full accounting of every human on the planet to verify your statement as fact: that no such person exists. Should probably use that statistical data you gathered to update the research on marriage, divorce, outcome studies ...


You are the best. Please keep it up! You and your Kate stan friends are who make reading the royalty threads so entertaining.


I never frequent that forum, ever. I do think that both your group and the Kate stand are clearly recognizable though. It’s like left and right wig posters. Just know that the rest of us on DCUM, we see you too.


Your very mention of statistics shows you do frequent the royal threads, even if you don’t post. I do think that the Kate stans ere weirdly fixated on there only being one, single Kate hater, and calling any criticism of the Cambridges as trolling. I’m not the immediate PP but a prior DP. Just for the record.


Well for the record, my mention of statistics is related to my ability to recognize an inaccurate statement: “no such person exists”. There is no way to account for that statement and it be true. That all I honed in on. So -you’re wrong.
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2019 13:19     Subject: Non-Famous But Frequent Posters II

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The anti- kate poster who monitors her work schedule on spreadsheets.


This is a weird fantasy. No such person exists. Not sure why you are so invested in a pretend person.



I didn’t know you took full accounting of every human on the planet to verify your statement as fact: that no such person exists. Should probably use that statistical data you gathered to update the research on marriage, divorce, outcome studies ...


You are the best. Please keep it up! You and your Kate stan friends are who make reading the royalty threads so entertaining.


I never frequent that forum, ever. I do think that both your group and the Kate stand are clearly recognizable though. It’s like left and right wig posters. Just know that the rest of us on DCUM, we see you too.


Your very mention of statistics shows you do frequent the royal threads, even if you don’t post. I do think that the Kate stans ere weirdly fixated on there only being one, single Kate hater, and calling any criticism of the Cambridges as trolling. I’m not the immediate PP but a prior DP. Just for the record.
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2019 13:17     Subject: Non-Famous But Frequent Posters II

Anonymous wrote:The soccer dads in the soccer forum — they are crazy.


NP. In what way? I don’t go into that forum either but see very long threads for that and the lacrosse forums.
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2019 13:16     Subject: Non-Famous But Frequent Posters II

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The anti- kate poster who monitors her work schedule on spreadsheets.


This is a weird fantasy. No such person exists. Not sure why you are so invested in a pretend person.



I didn’t know you took full accounting of every human on the planet to verify your statement as fact: that no such person exists. Should probably use that statistical data you gathered to update the research on marriage, divorce, outcome studies ...


You are the best. Please keep it up! You and your Kate stan friends are who make reading the royalty threads so entertaining.


I never frequent that forum, ever. I do think that both your group and the Kate stand are clearly recognizable though. It’s like left and right wig posters. Just know that the rest of us on DCUM, we see you too.
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2019 13:14     Subject: Non-Famous But Frequent Posters II

The soccer dads in the soccer forum — they are crazy.
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2019 13:07     Subject: Non-Famous But Frequent Posters II

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The anti- kate poster who monitors her work schedule on spreadsheets.


This is a weird fantasy. No such person exists. Not sure why you are so invested in a pretend person.



I didn’t know you took full accounting of every human on the planet to verify your statement as fact: that no such person exists. Should probably use that statistical data you gathered to update the research on marriage, divorce, outcome studies ...


You are the best. Please keep it up! You and your Kate stan friends are who make reading the royalty threads so entertaining.
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2019 12:58     Subject: Re:Non-Famous But Frequent Posters II

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anyone who starts a post with Um.


Um, you know these posters end everything with "right," right? Tell me you know that.


God yes. You do know....right? I want to slam their hands in doors and take away their typing privileges.

So snarky, smug, and unorginal.


I am ready for the your butt looks like long johns poster in high waisted pants person to disappear as well. She mentions the same thing in every high-waisted fashion thread.


Whomever the person was who references "FUPA" in a recent thread on high-waisted shorts had me giggling, though.
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2019 12:57     Subject: Non-Famous But Frequent Posters II

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The anti- kate poster who monitors her work schedule on spreadsheets.


This is a weird fantasy. No such person exists. Not sure why you are so invested in a pretend person.



I didn’t know you took full accounting of every human on the planet to verify your statement as fact: that no such person exists. Should probably use that statistical data you gathered to update the research on marriage, divorce, outcome studies ...