If you kid doesn't get into HPY and goes to say, UVA- what do you think will happen?
Anonymous wrote:I am shocked by how many people are upset of the SAT adversity score. They do not want to admit the privileges that their children having growing up in a nice school district, safe school, etc. These are all great things! Everyone wants these things for their kids but sadly, many kids do not have access to these resources. Why are people so afraid to own that privilege and be proud of it while also working toward the same future for other kids? What are you afraid of? Honestly if you kid doesn't get into HPY and goes to say, UVA- what do you think will happen? Do you really think their future is lost? Are you afraid they will end up on the streets?
Seriously please help me understand...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For everyone who admits privilege and wants for things to be equal, would you give your jobs (which you received due to privilege) to an underprivileged person? Would you give up your child's college admission so that an under privileged person could go in their stead?
This is the problem with his conversation. It is NOT a us versus them game. I don't have to give up my kid's college admission. He is talented, bright, and driven kid and will get into any number of good colleges. If he gets rejected from his first choice: for all I know, a smarter, more privileged person could be "taking his spot," not a less privileged one.
We WANT to believe it is the unqualified minority who is taking our spots because it is hard to believe our kids just didn't make the cut for some reason.
But either way, my kid will be FINE.
And I do not need to give up my job. What I can do is really i am in a competitive field. Sometimes people with better or worse dualities than me will get the promotions I feel I deserved.
Either way, I will be fine.
There really is enough to go around.
So then you would give his spot up? Yes or no.
I think her answer was a run around to say no for either the jobs or school. It's a lot of hand wringing and a lot of lip flapping with nothing to back it up. It's a form of NIMBY.
Her answer was not a "runaround."
She pointed out that your question has a false premise: you assume that there are only win-lose scenarios in life, in which one person wins and the other loses, which is the usual Darwinian nonsense trotted out by frightened, reactionary people who assume that a minority moving upward means that they will move downward.
You must live somewhere where there are limitless job and college openings. Of course someone wins and someone loses.
+1
I'm scratching my head about all this "there's enough to go around for everyone" nonsense. There's plainly not or there wouldn't be a huge and growing wealth divide.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For everyone who admits privilege and wants for things to be equal, would you give your jobs (which you received due to privilege) to an underprivileged person? Would you give up your child's college admission so that an under privileged person could go in their stead?
This is the problem with his conversation. It is NOT a us versus them game. I don't have to give up my kid's college admission. He is talented, bright, and driven kid and will get into any number of good colleges. If he gets rejected from his first choice: for all I know, a smarter, more privileged person could be "taking his spot," not a less privileged one.
We WANT to believe it is the unqualified minority who is taking our spots because it is hard to believe our kids just didn't make the cut for some reason.
But either way, my kid will be FINE.
And I do not need to give up my job. What I can do is really i am in a competitive field. Sometimes people with better or worse dualities than me will get the promotions I feel I deserved.
Either way, I will be fine.
There really is enough to go around.
So then you would give his spot up? Yes or no.
I think her answer was a run around to say no for either the jobs or school. It's a lot of hand wringing and a lot of lip flapping with nothing to back it up. It's a form of NIMBY.
Her answer was not a "runaround."
She pointed out that your question has a false premise: you assume that there are only win-lose scenarios in life, in which one person wins and the other loses, which is the usual Darwinian nonsense trotted out by frightened, reactionary people who assume that a minority moving upward means that they will move downward.
You must live somewhere where there are limitless job and college openings. Of course someone wins and someone loses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am shocked by how many people are upset of the SAT adversity score. They do not want to admit the privileges that their children having growing up in a nice school district, safe school, etc. These are all great things! Everyone wants these things for their kids but sadly, many kids do not have access to these resources. Why are people so afraid to own that privilege and be proud of it while also working toward the same future for other kids? What are you afraid of? Honestly if you kid doesn't get into HPY and goes to say, UVA- what do you think will happen? Do you really think their future is lost? Are you afraid they will end up on the streets?
Seriously please help me understand...
Why do we need SAT scores in the first place? Shouldn't every child that finishes their high school be educated and prepared for a higher education institution by default? Therefore maybe it all should be lottery based form here? Every college takes applications and just runs a lottery. All chances equal. Especially for publicly own colleges, when the kids come from public schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For everyone who admits privilege and wants for things to be equal, would you give your jobs (which you received due to privilege) to an underprivileged person? Would you give up your child's college admission so that an under privileged person could go in their stead?
This is the problem with his conversation. It is NOT a us versus them game. I don't have to give up my kid's college admission. He is talented, bright, and driven kid and will get into any number of good colleges. If he gets rejected from his first choice: for all I know, a smarter, more privileged person could be "taking his spot," not a less privileged one.
We WANT to believe it is the unqualified minority who is taking our spots because it is hard to believe our kids just didn't make the cut for some reason.
But either way, my kid will be FINE.
And I do not need to give up my job. What I can do is really i am in a competitive field. Sometimes people with better or worse dualities than me will get the promotions I feel I deserved.
Either way, I will be fine.
There really is enough to go around.
So then you would give his spot up? Yes or no.
I think her answer was a run around to say no for either the jobs or school. It's a lot of hand wringing and a lot of lip flapping with nothing to back it up. It's a form of NIMBY.
Her answer was not a "runaround."
She pointed out that your question has a false premise: you assume that there are only win-lose scenarios in life, in which one person wins and the other loses, which is the usual Darwinian nonsense trotted out by frightened, reactionary people who assume that a minority moving upward means that they will move downward.
You must live somewhere where there are limitless job and college openings. Of course someone wins and someone loses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For everyone who admits privilege and wants for things to be equal, would you give your jobs (which you received due to privilege) to an underprivileged person? Would you give up your child's college admission so that an under privileged person could go in their stead?
This is the problem with his conversation. It is NOT a us versus them game. I don't have to give up my kid's college admission. He is talented, bright, and driven kid and will get into any number of good colleges. If he gets rejected from his first choice: for all I know, a smarter, more privileged person could be "taking his spot," not a less privileged one.
We WANT to believe it is the unqualified minority who is taking our spots because it is hard to believe our kids just didn't make the cut for some reason.
But either way, my kid will be FINE.
And I do not need to give up my job. What I can do is really i am in a competitive field. Sometimes people with better or worse dualities than me will get the promotions I feel I deserved.
Either way, I will be fine.
There really is enough to go around.
So then you would give his spot up? Yes or no.
I think her answer was a run around to say no for either the jobs or school. It's a lot of hand wringing and a lot of lip flapping with nothing to back it up. It's a form of NIMBY.
Her answer was not a "runaround."
She pointed out that your question has a false premise: you assume that there are only win-lose scenarios in life, in which one person wins and the other loses, which is the usual Darwinian nonsense trotted out by frightened, reactionary people who assume that a minority moving upward means that they will move downward.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My husband is an outlier in this regard - and I appreciate that. He’s tall, white, handsome, grew up UMC in a tony Boston suburb, superb education (Nobles, GW, Hopkins). He was given a winning hand at birth, and talks about his luck in life. Yes, he works hard, but acknowledges that his success comes mostly from his circumstances and peer group growing up.
GW is “superb”?
He got his first master’s there. And depending on the program - yes.
I’ll take your word for it.
Anonymous wrote:I am shocked by how many people are upset of the SAT adversity score. They do not want to admit the privileges that their children having growing up in a nice school district, safe school, etc. These are all great things! Everyone wants these things for their kids but sadly, many kids do not have access to these resources. Why are people so afraid to own that privilege and be proud of it while also working toward the same future for other kids? What are you afraid of? Honestly if you kid doesn't get into HPY and goes to say, UVA- what do you think will happen? Do you really think their future is lost? Are you afraid they will end up on the streets?
Seriously please help me understand...