Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her children will never trust her again. That's the worst part.

Didn’t they know about it? I don’t see this changing much between her and her kids.

The Youtuber moved out and is staying with her boyfriend. Much has changed.

Oh please. Pretty sure Mommy and Daddy are still fronting her lifestyle.

No. Olivia Jade had enough followers and endorsements she made a lot of money already. I would assume she probably already made at least her first half miliion. She lost her sponsors, but could make a comeback with the right approach.

Self-made!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s the “Becky with the good hair” ( and she truly does have great hair) comments that have brought me to her side.
It reminds me of the “white women’s tears” BS from a while back.
I’m just not inclined to lynch white people because it’s their turn...
Jail time is ludicrous, but prosecutors have to move the negotiations has far over as they can. I get it. It’s why I support the death penalty. It gives the prosecutors the ability to play hardball if the needle is on the table.
But for this? Meh.
I’m sure a fine would suffice. Maybe she could do some community service for at risk youth- help raise money to open more doors for kids who need it. Maybe pay for two kids to go to USC, since she literally only impeded spaces for two kids.

She and Smollett both need jail time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her children will never trust her again. That's the worst part.

Didn’t they know about it? I don’t see this changing much between her and her kids.

The Youtuber moved out and is staying with her boyfriend. Much has changed.

Oh please. Pretty sure Mommy and Daddy are still fronting her lifestyle.

No. Olivia Jade had enough followers and endorsements she made a lot of money already. I would assume she probably already made at least her first half miliion. She lost her sponsors, but could make a comeback with the right approach.

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s the “Becky with the good hair” ( and she truly does have great hair) comments that have brought me to her side.
It reminds me of the “white women’s tears” BS from a while back.
I’m just not inclined to lynch white people because it’s their turn...
Jail time is ludicrous, but prosecutors have to move the negotiations has far over as they can. I get it. It’s why I support the death penalty. It gives the prosecutors the ability to play hardball if the needle is on the table.
But for this? Meh.
I’m sure a fine would suffice. Maybe she could do some community service for at risk youth- help raise money to open more doors for kids who need it. Maybe pay for two kids to go to USC, since she literally only impeded spaces for two kids.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The idea that she and her husband tried to steamroll and intimidate that poor school guidance counselor....

She's a nasty bully.

How do we know that?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s the “Becky with the good hair” ( and she truly does have great hair) comments that have brought me to her side.
It reminds me of the “white women’s tears” BS from a while back.
I’m just not inclined to lynch white people because it’s their turn...
Jail time is ludicrous, but prosecutors have to move the negotiations has far over as they can. I get it. It’s why I support the death penalty. It gives the prosecutors the ability to play hardball if the needle is on the table.
But for this? Meh.
I’m sure a fine would suffice. Maybe she could do some community service for at risk youth- help raise money to open more doors for kids who need it. Maybe pay for two kids to go to USC, since she literally only impeded spaces for two kids.

The lack of logic in this post is bizarre. She willfully committed fraud. What on earth does this have to do with "white woman's tears"? But at least we're clear there is one or more Trump supporters in the house.

I'm a Trump supporter and no way am I defending what Laughlin did. Good grief, she knowingly and willfully committed fraud - twice. Trump was elected into office rightfully You might have sour grapes over Trump being there but that doesn't mean that he is in his position fraudulently. Laughlin's daughters on the other hand....yep, fraud.

Uh huh... still not following why you are bringing Trump into this... her commiting a crime is not what I’m discussing. Level of vitriol being out of proportion to the alleged crime. Try to stay with us.

Sorry should have made it clear - I was responding to the "we're clear there is one or more Trump supporters in the house" statement. I am not the above pp but I am a Trump supporter and I can assure you that I do not support this sort of cheating.

Thank you, I did not mean to paint with that broad a brush. It was the "white woman's tears" comment that led me to make that assumption about that one particular poster. My spouse is conservative, and also thinks the proverbial book should be thrown at the whole lot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s the “Becky with the good hair” ( and she truly does have great hair) comments that have brought me to her side.
It reminds me of the “white women’s tears” BS from a while back.
I’m just not inclined to lynch white people because it’s their turn...
Jail time is ludicrous, but prosecutors have to move the negotiations has far over as they can. I get it. It’s why I support the death penalty. It gives the prosecutors the ability to play hardball if the needle is on the table.
But for this? Meh.
I’m sure a fine would suffice. Maybe she could do some community service for at risk youth- help raise money to open more doors for kids who need it. Maybe pay for two kids to go to USC, since she literally only impeded spaces for two kids.

The lack of logic in this post is bizarre. She willfully committed fraud. What on earth does this have to do with "white woman's tears"? But at least we're clear there is one or more Trump supporters in the house.

I'm a Trump supporter and no way am I defending what Laughlin did. Good grief, she knowingly and willfully committed fraud - twice. Trump was elected into office rightfully You might have sour grapes over Trump being there but that doesn't mean that he is in his position fraudulently. Laughlin's daughters on the other hand....yep, fraud.

Uh huh... still not following why you are bringing Trump into this... her commiting a crime is not what I’m discussing. Level of vitriol being out of proportion to the alleged crime. Try to stay with us.

Her committing a crime is not what you're discussing? Isn't that all we should be discussing, in addition to the culture of entitlement and privilege that led her to believe it was okay to fraudulently gain admission for her children who did not merit it? Thinking her actions are minor in any way, or that she should somehow get a pass because "women just hate other attractive women" is an indication of a seriously flawed moral compass.

Delighting in the downfall of another isn’t exactly a shining beacon either, which is what most of the threads have descended into.

Anonymous wrote:The idea that she and her husband tried to steamroll and intimidate that poor school guidance counselor....

She's a nasty bully.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s the “Becky with the good hair” ( and she truly does have great hair) comments that have brought me to her side.
It reminds me of the “white women’s tears” BS from a while back.
I’m just not inclined to lynch white people because it’s their turn...
Jail time is ludicrous, but prosecutors have to move the negotiations has far over as they can. I get it. It’s why I support the death penalty. It gives the prosecutors the ability to play hardball if the needle is on the table.
But for this? Meh.
I’m sure a fine would suffice. Maybe she could do some community service for at risk youth- help raise money to open more doors for kids who need it. Maybe pay for two kids to go to USC, since she literally only impeded spaces for two kids.

The lack of logic in this post is bizarre. She willfully committed fraud. What on earth does this have to do with "white woman's tears"? But at least we're clear there is one or more Trump supporters in the house.

I'm a Trump supporter and no way am I defending what Laughlin did. Good grief, she knowingly and willfully committed fraud - twice. Trump was elected into office rightfully You might have sour grapes over Trump being there but that doesn't mean that he is in his position fraudulently. Laughlin's daughters on the other hand....yep, fraud.

Uh huh... still not following why you are bringing Trump into this... her commiting a crime is not what I’m discussing. Level of vitriol being out of proportion to the alleged crime. Try to stay with us.

Sorry should have made it clear - I was responding to the "we're clear there is one or more Trump supporters in the house" statement. I am not the above pp but I am a Trump supporter and I can assure you that I do not support this sort of cheating.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s the “Becky with the good hair” ( and she truly does have great hair) comments that have brought me to her side.
It reminds me of the “white women’s tears” BS from a while back.
I’m just not inclined to lynch white people because it’s their turn...
Jail time is ludicrous, but prosecutors have to move the negotiations has far over as they can. I get it. It’s why I support the death penalty. It gives the prosecutors the ability to play hardball if the needle is on the table.
But for this? Meh.
I’m sure a fine would suffice. Maybe she could do some community service for at risk youth- help raise money to open more doors for kids who need it. Maybe pay for two kids to go to USC, since she literally only impeded spaces for two kids.

The lack of logic in this post is bizarre. She willfully committed fraud. What on earth does this have to do with "white woman's tears"? But at least we're clear there is one or more Trump supporters in the house.

I'm a Trump supporter and no way am I defending what Laughlin did. Good grief, she knowingly and willfully committed fraud - twice. Trump was elected into office rightfully You might have sour grapes over Trump being there but that doesn't mean that he is in his position fraudulently. Laughlin's daughters on the other hand....yep, fraud.

Uh huh... still not following why you are bringing Trump into this... her commiting a crime is not what I’m discussing. Level of vitriol being out of proportion to the alleged crime. Try to stay with us.

Her committing a crime is not what you're discussing? Isn't that all we should be discussing, in addition to the culture of entitlement and privilege that led her to believe it was okay to fraudulently gain admission for her children who did not merit it? Thinking her actions are minor in any way, or that she should somehow get a pass because "women just hate other attractive women" is an indication of a seriously flawed moral compass.