Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wasn’t your son the instigator?
Suppose so. Seems like a broken jaw may be taking it a bit far. Anger management issues perhaps?
Maybe but what are you looking for?
Not sure, that's obviously why I posted here. I'm upset some kid broke my son's jaw as I'm sure any parent would be. There were 5 other kids there so I'm sure I will be getting all sides of the story. I'm not looking for retribution or revenge. But I do think the kid should be held responsible for inflicting a serious injury. Apparently most of you would just let it go and that's fine. I'm just not sure what to do.
You have no business investigating this on your own. This is a police matter. Call them immediately.
+1 any decent university would have called them already.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wasn’t your son the instigator?
Suppose so. Seems like a broken jaw may be taking it a bit far. Anger management issues perhaps?
Maybe but what are you looking for?
Not sure, that's obviously why I posted here. I'm upset some kid broke my son's jaw as I'm sure any parent would be. There were 5 other kids there so I'm sure I will be getting all sides of the story. I'm not looking for retribution or revenge. But I do think the kid should be held responsible for inflicting a serious injury. Apparently most of you would just let it go and that's fine. I'm just not sure what to do.
You have no business investigating this on your own. This is a police matter. Call them immediately.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wasn’t your son the instigator?
Suppose so. Seems like a broken jaw may be taking it a bit far. Anger management issues perhaps?
Maybe but what are you looking for?
Not sure, that's obviously why I posted here. I'm upset some kid broke my son's jaw as I'm sure any parent would be. There were 5 other kids there so I'm sure I will be getting all sides of the story. I'm not looking for retribution or revenge. But I do think the kid should be held responsible for inflicting a serious injury. Apparently most of you would just let it go and that's fine. I'm just not sure what to do.
Anonymous wrote:Lot of angry cowards who have never been in an actual fight on this thread.
Anonymous wrote:Timely article about all this young male violence.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/30/opinion/sunday/boys-men-violence.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to wonder if this is a troll post. All these “unwanted touching” PPs have never seen the results of a broken jaw. It’s serious assault, serious recovery time and not excusable unless a documented accident. Punching someone in the face hard enough to break jaw is a crime and not justified
.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to wonder if this is a troll post. All these “unwanted touching” PPs have never seen the results of a broken jaw. It’s serious assault, serious recovery time and not excusable unless a documented accident. Punching someone in the face hard enough to break jaw is a crime and not justified
This is such a weird response to me. You realize that "touching" someone else's head can be a hedging way of referring to a range from a teeny boop on the tip of the nose to flicking him directly in the eye, or clapping him on the side of the head a'la the eardrum rupture in It's A Wonderful Life?
How the hell can you say you know whether it was proportional or not? Especially given it could have been a wild swing that just landed right.
You're pushing a narrative.
Touching someone’s anything when unwanted is assault - plain and simple.
Agreed. But the law looks at things like whether the response was proportional. There is case law on this.
From what OP wrote, it could certainly go either way. Anyone that makes a firm judgment call one way or the other is projecting something.
Proportional would refer to the means not the outcome. If he'd used a gun or a knife or a club on the guy, not proportional. Punching a guy who lays his hands on you, yes, proportional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to wonder if this is a troll post. All these “unwanted touching” PPs have never seen the results of a broken jaw. It’s serious assault, serious recovery time and not excusable unless a documented accident. Punching someone in the face hard enough to break jaw is a crime and not justified
This is such a weird response to me. You realize that "touching" someone else's head can be a hedging way of referring to a range from a teeny boop on the tip of the nose to flicking him directly in the eye, or clapping him on the side of the head a'la the eardrum rupture in It's A Wonderful Life?
How the hell can you say you know whether it was proportional or not? Especially given it could have been a wild swing that just landed right.
You're pushing a narrative.
Touching someone’s anything when unwanted is assault - plain and simple.
Agreed. But the law looks at things like whether the response was proportional. There is case law on this.
From what OP wrote, it could certainly go either way. Anyone that makes a firm judgment call one way or the other is projecting something.
Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to wonder if this is a troll post. All these “unwanted touching” PPs have never seen the results of a broken jaw. It’s serious assault, serious recovery time and not excusable unless a documented accident. Punching someone in the face hard enough to break jaw is a crime and not justified
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, as an RA, here are things I know some 18 year old men did to each other that led to fights in the dorms:
Place a used condom on a roommate’s pillow.
Fart directly at a hallmate walking by
Press naked genitals against a roommate’s family photo of mom and two sisters.
Ejaculate in roommate’s 2 in 1 shampoo
Smush a rotted pickled egg on hallmate’s back
All of these things were done to humiliate the other man and establish dominance. In all cases, things only went to the j board after the victim physically retailiated and then the injured perp claimed to be playing.
So gross. I hope that they didn’t just punch the person in the face here as more would be so satisfying.
Not one of those things justifies BREAKING SOMEONES JAW by punching in the mouth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to wonder if this is a troll post. All these “unwanted touching” PPs have never seen the results of a broken jaw. It’s serious assault, serious recovery time and not excusable unless a documented accident. Punching someone in the face hard enough to break jaw is a crime and not justified
This is such a weird response to me. You realize that "touching" someone else's head can be a hedging way of referring to a range from a teeny boop on the tip of the nose to flicking him directly in the eye, or clapping him on the side of the head a'la the eardrum rupture in It's A Wonderful Life?
How the hell can you say you know whether it was proportional or not? Especially given it could have been a wild swing that just landed right.
You're pushing a narrative.
Touching someone’s anything when unwanted is assault - plain and simple.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to wonder if this is a troll post. All these “unwanted touching” PPs have never seen the results of a broken jaw. It’s serious assault, serious recovery time and not excusable unless a documented accident. Punching someone in the face hard enough to break jaw is a crime and not justified
Oh, come on. If someone touched your daughter in a way she didn't like, she told him to stop, he did it again, and she hit him in the face and broke his jaw (and PPs are right, jaws break very easily if hit in the wrong place) , you think she was unjustified, and committed a crime? Don't be ridiculous.
Also, I'd bet my mortgage payment that OP didn't get the complete story from her son.