Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is that for the added revenue from taxing the rich to make a dent, DCUM would have to agree that the rich includes anyone worth $3 million or earning $300k+. Watch the DCUM liberals squawk about that.
But I'd be for it.
Not true at all. A significant amount of money could be raised even if we only tax wealth above $50 million
How much does YOUR family earn? It's easy to say "tax other people," but are YOU willing to kick in more?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/tax-the-rich-786673/
Personally, I'm disgusted by the horrible inequality in this country.
Sick of multi millionaires and billionaires hoarding their wealth like dragons sitting on top of their piles of gold while regular people being crushed by debt.
And sick of seeing rich people spend tens of millions on mansions while the rest of us can't afford to live within an hour of our jobs.
We are in a new gilded age and once again the rich have proved that if you let them keep the millions and billions they suck out of our economy, it won't trickle down to anyone except maybe yacht manufacturers.
I fully support the wealth tax. The ultra rich haven't done anything to make me sympathetic to any concerns they will have about this plan. And for any super rich person reading this.. hope you're ready for the rest of us to stick our poor dirty hands in your fat bank accounts. We're coming for you ....
You basically just tried to label all millionaires and billionaires as people who have no concern for the poor, “we’re coming for you”
Anonymous wrote:https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/tax-the-rich-786673/
Personally, I'm disgusted by the horrible inequality in this country.
Sick of multi millionaires and billionaires hoarding their wealth like dragons sitting on top of their piles of gold while regular people being crushed by debt.
And sick of seeing rich people spend tens of millions on mansions while the rest of us can't afford to live within an hour of our jobs.
We are in a new gilded age and once again the rich have proved that if you let them keep the millions and billions they suck out of our economy, it won't trickle down to anyone except maybe yacht manufacturers.
I fully support the wealth tax. The ultra rich haven't done anything to make me sympathetic to any concerns they will have about this plan. And for any super rich person reading this.. hope you're ready for the rest of us to stick our poor dirty hands in your fat bank accounts. We're coming for you ....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tell us how taking more money from people who are wealthy will make you more wealthy.
How will taxing the wealthy solve the problem of income inequality.
Know what will make me happy? When NYC cops don't have a higher tax rate than hedge fund managers. When Jared Kushner pays some kind of tax on his $300 million net worth increase.
A number of millionaires and billionaires have gotten together and said they WANT to be TAXED HIGHER, in order to help others.
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/12/hundreds-of-millionaires-are-banding-together-to-tell-congress-raise-our-taxes.html
Over 400 American millionaires and billionaires plan to send a letter to Congress this week petitioning on lawmakers not to cut their taxes, the Washington Post reported
November 2017
http://www.responsiblewealth.org/read_the_letter
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If someone has worked for their money honestly and fairly, and they are now a billionaire or millionaire because of it, then I wouldn’t accuse them of hoarding their money and not giving it too the poor. People should provide for those who need help, but it should be a voluntary decision, not forced. A flat tax will work fine, everyone pays their fair share.
You are not very bright. Flat taxes penalize the poor. During the time of Eisenhower, taxes on the rich were double what they are now. Back when people cared about each other as a society.
I honestly believe there is a strong connection between the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the inadequate tax rate we have today. Racism is a nation-wide thing, of course, but conservative southerners in particular couldn't abide their tax dollars going to black people. Reagan's tales of welfare queens and young bucks eating T-bones struck pay dirt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If someone has worked for their money honestly and fairly, and they are now a billionaire or millionaire because of it, then I wouldn’t accuse them of hoarding their money and not giving it too the poor. People should provide for those who need help, but it should be a voluntary decision, not forced. A flat tax will work fine, everyone pays their fair share.
You are not very bright. Flat taxes penalize the poor. During the time of Eisenhower, taxes on the rich were double what they are now. Back when people cared about each other as a society.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone should pay their fair share. The super rich get poor/middle class people to buy into the idea they shouldn't have to pay their fair share.
Yep
I'd like to see everyone limited to a maximum income of $150k a year, and maximum assets of $500k/person.
Anyone with more than that after _____ date when it goes into affect loses it. The government can then reallocate that money to people with less, and even everyone out. That's certainly a fairer system than what we have now.
Hahahaha!!!! Omg. Hahahahaha!!!! What a wacko! You're in the wrong country. We have something called freedom here. The government confiscating your property and dispersing it to others is not freedom. It is theft. There are plenty of communist utopias for you to move to, China, Russia...please leave. No really, you are a horrible person.
I think they are a republican mocking people who want more taxes.
I hope you are right. But it seems the radical left has hijacked the Democratic party. Listen to your announced candidates. Which almost guarantees a Trump relection. I am praying Shultz officially announces. He has my vote.
If they are radical then FDR, johnson and kennedy were insanely radical. No one who has announced they are running is radical. That person is trolling us.
Oh stop. Identity politics and class warfare all the way. All of them. Sickening. They would all lose to Trump. Also why we need someone logical, who can do the math, a centrist like Schultz. I think he'll pull enough Republicans sick and embarrassed of Trump, all of the Independent moderates like me, and all of the sensible regular Democrats who are disgusted with the identity politics and progressive dogma of the Dems. Schultz would win and that's why the Dems are pressuring him to not run.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone should pay their fair share. The super rich get poor/middle class people to buy into the idea they shouldn't have to pay their fair share.
Yep
I'd like to see everyone limited to a maximum income of $150k a year, and maximum assets of $500k/person.
Anyone with more than that after _____ date when it goes into affect loses it. The government can then reallocate that money to people with less, and even everyone out. That's certainly a fairer system than what we have now.
Hahahaha!!!! Omg. Hahahahaha!!!! What a wacko! You're in the wrong country. We have something called freedom here. The government confiscating your property and dispersing it to others is not freedom. It is theft. There are plenty of communist utopias for you to move to, China, Russia...please leave. No really, you are a horrible person.
I think they are a republican mocking people who want more taxes.
I hope you are right. But it seems the radical left has hijacked the Democratic party. Listen to your announced candidates. Which almost guarantees a Trump relection. I am praying Shultz officially announces. He has my vote.
If they are radical then FDR, johnson and kennedy were insanely radical. No one who has announced they are running is radical. That person is trolling us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tell us how taking more money from people who are wealthy will make you more wealthy.
How will taxing the wealthy solve the problem of income inequality.
Know what will make me happy? When NYC cops don't have a higher tax rate than hedge fund managers. When Jared Kushner pays some kind of tax on his $300 million net worth increase.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If someone has worked for their money honestly and fairly, and they are now a billionaire or millionaire because of it, then I wouldn’t accuse them of hoarding their money and not giving it too the poor. People should provide for those who need help, but it should be a voluntary decision, not forced. A flat tax will work fine, everyone pays their fair share.
You are not very bright. Flat taxes penalize the poor. During the time of Eisenhower, taxes on the rich were double what they are now. Back when people cared about each other as a society.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone should pay their fair share. The super rich get poor/middle class people to buy into the idea they shouldn't have to pay their fair share.
Yep
I'd like to see everyone limited to a maximum income of $150k a year, and maximum assets of $500k/person.
Anyone with more than that after _____ date when it goes into affect loses it. The government can then reallocate that money to people with less, and even everyone out. That's certainly a fairer system than what we have now.
Hahahaha!!!! Omg. Hahahahaha!!!! What a wacko! You're in the wrong country. We have something called freedom here. The government confiscating your property and dispersing it to others is not freedom. It is theft. There are plenty of communist utopias for you to move to, China, Russia...please leave. No really, you are a horrible person.
I think they are a republican mocking people who want more taxes.
I hope you are right. But it seems the radical left has hijacked the Democratic party. Listen to your announced candidates. Which almost guarantees a Trump relection. I am praying Shultz officially announces. He has my vote.
Anonymous wrote:Tell us how taking more money from people who are wealthy will make you more wealthy.
How will taxing the wealthy solve the problem of income inequality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone should pay their fair share. The super rich get poor/middle class people to buy into the idea they shouldn't have to pay their fair share.
Yep
I'd like to see everyone limited to a maximum income of $150k a year, and maximum assets of $500k/person.
Anyone with more than that after _____ date when it goes into affect loses it. The government can then reallocate that money to people with less, and even everyone out. That's certainly a fairer system than what we have now.
Hahahaha!!!! Omg. Hahahahaha!!!! What a wacko! You're in the wrong country. We have something called freedom here. The government confiscating your property and dispersing it to others is not freedom. It is theft. There are plenty of communist utopias for you to move to, China, Russia...please leave. No really, you are a horrible person.
I think they are a republican mocking people who want more taxes.