Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:After 30 minutes I had to turn it off. I believe the victims. I don’t need a two part documentary of 4 hours to convince me.
Feldman, who shared his abuse publicly, claims MJ is innocent. Perhaps Feldman wasn't MJ's type . . .
Culkin hasn't said anything either.
Both could have easily been groomed, too.
weird situation altogether
Anonymous wrote:After 30 minutes I had to turn it off. I believe the victims. I don’t need a two part documentary of 4 hours to convince me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MJ is prime bait. He was weird enough that you can cast all sorts of accusations his way and find some audience that will believe you. I'm leaning toward he wasn't an abuser but I hesitate to declare that as I don't want to stand against any victims. BUT, how many people were so quick to defend Kavanaugh against all kinds of allegations and justify them, and how quick we are to condemn someone who feels sincere, hurt, and lost.
This a 100%
Poor Michael Jackson was a very talented but deeply troubled man who was hurting and alone. It didn’t help that he looked super weird and acted super weird. He was naive and wholly unaware of how to operate as a “normal” person in society. For some reason he seemed to have connected with children.Maybe because he could connect with them and be his weird self around them without them judging him harshly. His boundaries or appropriatenes with children were definitely murky by society’s standards but I have not seen any evidence that demonstrates his intentions were malicious or that he hurt any of them.
It’s surprising to me that everyone is defending Brett Kavaunauhh when he obviously seemed malicious and could have actually assaulted someone. But because he was powerful and successful and lived a very conventional life, people were quick to question the allegations.
Why isn’t MJ being offered the same courtesy? Because he’s weird and because he was a black man.
This isn’t the first instance of a black man being assumed guilty becaueeba white person said so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MJ is prime bait. He was weird enough that you can cast all sorts of accusations his way and find some audience that will believe you. I'm leaning toward he wasn't an abuser but I hesitate to declare that as I don't want to stand against any victims. BUT, how many people were so quick to defend Kavanaugh against all kinds of allegations and justify them, and how quick we are to condemn someone who feels sincere, hurt, and lost.
This a 100%
Poor Michael Jackson was a very talented but deeply troubled man who was hurting and alone. It didn’t help that he looked super weird and acted super weird. He was naive and wholly unaware of how to operate as a “normal” person in society. For some reason he seemed to have connected with children.Maybe because he could connect with them and be his weird self around them without them judging him harshly. His boundaries or appropriatenes with children were definitely murky by society’s standards but I have not seen any evidence that demonstrates his intentions were malicious or that he hurt any of them.
It’s surprising to me that everyone is defending Brett Kavaunauhh when he obviously seemed malicious and could have actually assaulted someone. But because he was powerful and successful and lived a very conventional life, people were quick to question the allegations.
Why isn’t MJ being offered the same courtesy? Because he’s weird and because he was a black man.
This isn’t the first instance of a black man being assumed guilty becaueeba white person said so.
Anonymous wrote:MJ is prime bait. He was weird enough that you can cast all sorts of accusations his way and find some audience that will believe you. I'm leaning toward he wasn't an abuser but I hesitate to declare that as I don't want to stand against any victims. BUT, how many people were so quick to defend Kavanaugh against all kinds of allegations and justify them, and how quick we are to condemn someone who feels sincere, hurt, and lost.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are all these randos defending him? I am sure there are better causes for justice to dedicate oneself to.
I think these are paid troll or bots generating responses.
Because they don’t agree with you?
I’m in the camp that he was a pedophile. When the second allegation came out that was it for me but I get that some ppl don’t think he was. Some ppl will never think he was a pedophile. Both those men lied and said MJ never touched them when it really mattered so now it’s hard for some to believe them.
To be fair... both those "children lied" and now as adults they are telling their story.
Often children don't know what child abuse is... so what they say is not really a lie.
If you ask a kid, did your teacher abuse you... they may say no.
If you ask a kid, did your teacher sit you on his lap and move you around, they may say yes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are all these randos defending him? I am sure there are better causes for justice to dedicate oneself to.
I think these are paid troll or bots generating responses.
Because they don’t agree with you?
I’m in the camp that he was a pedophile. When the second allegation came out that was it for me but I get that some ppl don’t think he was. Some ppl will never think he was a pedophile. Both those men lied and said MJ never touched them when it really mattered so now it’s hard for some to believe them.
How much are you getting paid?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are all these randos defending him? I am sure there are better causes for justice to dedicate oneself to.
I think these are paid troll or bots generating responses.
Because they don’t agree with you?
I’m in the camp that he was a pedophile. When the second allegation came out that was it for me but I get that some ppl don’t think he was. Some ppl will never think he was a pedophile. Both those men lied and said MJ never touched them when it really mattered so now it’s hard for some to believe them.
To be fair... both those "children lied" and now as adults they are telling their story.
Often children don't know what child abuse is... so what they say is not really a lie.
If you ask a kid, did your teacher abuse you... they may say no.
If you ask a kid, did your teacher sit you on his lap and move you around, they may say yes.