Anonymous wrote:

Is that what you use for your bits?

No, it is not. My bits work quite well.

You are the one visits the plastic surgeon for work on her breasts. Does he use duct tape to keep them off your knees?

I'm not. There's more than one woman here who thinks you are a vulgar, annoying adolescent trapped in a grandpa's body.

taketothebank wrote:

Grandpa, you be so butt hurt!

Time to grow up and act the age you look. You never replied to the questions about your plastic surgery spending and helping to undo a lifetime's damage to your body.

Without some work there, most men could fit their balls (taut or saggy) inside you as well.

Gramps is so cute- he thinks he’s talking to only one person
oh sweet sir you’re so adorable! I give you credit for getting out and trying message boards, way to keep yourself from isolating as you age!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a 52 to male and have dated as young as 35 and as old as 58. Age is just a number after awhile and chemistry is more important.

If you want a real lifetime partner then you need to be compatible. Meaning similar ages, economic and social class, similar educations, etc. Thirty five is too young, and it will be about lust for you. $$$ for the 35 year old, but nothing lasting unless you're willing to finance her life. It all depends on what you want. Lots of young women are happy to date a fossil because they make excellent ATMs.

Let's face the facts -- every woman is milking a man for his resources. There's nothing a 35 year old is going to ask you to "finance" when you're 50 or 60 that she wouldn't ask you to finance if you were also 35. She wants to live with you? So what, she'd also want to do that if you were 35. If she doesn't want kids, and doesn't have kids she expects you to pay for, then there isn't much she can really ask you to pay for. I guess you could let her quit her job and sit around your house doing nothing, if you were really stupid, but I assure you that I am not that stupid.

Same with every other man milking the woman for her resources. The point is in "general" if you desire to be with someone vastly younger it's going to be about money for them. That's ok if both partners are getting their needs met. And the older one understands it's never going to be about real love. Many can be happy with that arrangement. Each to their own.

Grandpa, you be so butt hurt!

Time to grow up and act the age you look. You never replied to the questions about your plastic surgery spending and helping to undo a lifetime's damage to your body.

Without some work there, most men could fit their balls (taut or saggy) inside you as well.

Can’t believe this thread is still going...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a 52 to male and have dated as young as 35 and as old as 58. Age is just a number after awhile and chemistry is more important.

If you want a real lifetime partner then you need to be compatible. Meaning similar ages, economic and social class, similar educations, etc. Thirty five is too young, and it will be about lust for you. $$$ for the 35 year old, but nothing lasting unless you're willing to finance her life. It all depends on what you want. Lots of young women are happy to date a fossil because they make excellent ATMs.

Let's face the facts -- every woman is milking a man for his resources. There's nothing a 35 year old is going to ask you to "finance" when you're 50 or 60 that she wouldn't ask you to finance if you were also 35. She wants to live with you? So what, she'd also want to do that if you were 35. If she doesn't want kids, and doesn't have kids she expects you to pay for, then there isn't much she can really ask you to pay for. I guess you could let her quit her job and sit around your house doing nothing, if you were really stupid, but I assure you that I am not that stupid.

Not me. I'm just milking for sperm and multiple orgasms, I'm financially independent, thanks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Perhaps but the only thing this man wants to help children with is taking their clothing off.

“I’ve had much younger”

You are confusing the man you are bullying with me. By much younger, I meant 23 (I am early 50s). She was no child, she had a BA from a good school, and was a GS-11 in your federal government. The 20s women I have dated don't seem to have daddy issues--they are from intact families with good parents, and all of them were well-educated, and working on advanced degrees.

Funny thing about women: take a 25 year old to dinner, and she takes you back to her place for phenomenal sex. Take a 55 year old to dinner and she complains about her ex, how poor she is, how she can't retire, and then she shakes your hand at the end of the date. Guess which one I like better?

I'd love to hear more about their good parents. When you met them and were older than them, did they raise any objections? Because I'd think good parents wouldn't.

I'm not sure why your dating pool is so filled with absolutes ~ either 23 YO's who are perfect or 50 somethings who are broke?

I'm not either, I guess thats why your path hasn't crossed with mine. The good looking rich women wouldn't ever fall for some sap who goes on and on about the cruel march of time to 27 year old women and insults their breasts/vagina/bodies and lives the way that you do.

At the end of the day though you know this doesn't matter ~ you're still in your 50's or 60's on a parenting website bragging about your sex life and letting strangers know the state of your balls and body fat. Thats icky.

Anonymous wrote:Perhaps but the only thing this man wants to help children with is taking their clothing off.

“I’ve had much younger”

You are confusing the man you are bullying with me. By much younger, I meant 23 (I am early 50s). She was no child, she had a BA from a good school, and was a GS-11 in your federal government. The 20s women I have dated don't seem to have daddy issues--they are from intact families with good parents, and all of them were well-educated, and working on advanced degrees.

Funny thing about women: take a 25 year old to dinner, and she takes you back to her place for phenomenal sex. Take a 55 year old to dinner and she complains about her ex, how poor she is, how she can't retire, and then she shakes your hand at the end of the date. Guess which one I like better?

Grandpa, you be so butt hurt!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a 52 to male and have dated as young as 35 and as old as 58. Age is just a number after awhile and chemistry is more important.

If you want a real lifetime partner then you need to be compatible. Meaning similar ages, economic and social class, similar educations, etc. Thirty five is too young, and it will be about lust for you. $$$ for the 35 year old, but nothing lasting unless you're willing to finance her life. It all depends on what you want. Lots of young women are happy to date a fossil because they make excellent ATMs.

Let's face the facts -- every woman is milking a man for his resources. There's nothing a 35 year old is going to ask you to "finance" when you're 50 or 60 that she wouldn't ask you to finance if you were also 35. She wants to live with you? So what, she'd also want to do that if you were 35. If she doesn't want kids, and doesn't have kids she expects you to pay for, then there isn't much she can really ask you to pay for. I guess you could let her quit her job and sit around your house doing nothing, if you were really stupid, but I assure you that I am not that stupid.

Anonymous wrote:I'm 46 and 62 is older than my desired range

Let's see, using the half his age plus seven rule, age 78 is in your range. But you'll have to get over your obsessive dislike of saggy balls...

Anonymous wrote:Thanks for derailing the thread, GSB (Grandpa Saggy Balls).

You bitter old women are really hung up on the "saggy balls" thing. You must think it's a devastating insult. You should really go back to the standard female attacks ("you're a gay incel living in your mother's basement!") because lame as those are, they have more power than "saggy balls". There are a lot of male insecurities out there, but I assure you that "are my balls saggy or taut?" is not on any man's mind.

Far as I can tell, my balls are as taut as ever. But let's say they were saggy. A woman is not even going to notice my balls before she has already agreed to get naked with me. Somehow I doubt she's going to say "oh I'm not in the mood anymore!" at that point.

Meanwhile, your saggy boobs, flabby upper arms, and wrinkly face are the first thing any man notices. He rejects you before you've even gone on a date with him. Sad!

Saggy balls at 60 >>> saggy boobs at 30

Anonymous wrote:The value is presumably fertility if you picked 22-

If you’re considering fertility an asset in your dating pool as a AARP member you are a minority.

Nah, it's hotness.

Of course, hotness is a proxy for fertility, but the fertility is irrelevant for my purposes.

Perhaps but the only thing this man wants to help children with is taking their clothing off.

“I’ve had much younger”