Anonymous wrote:There was a time when the husband would decide whose life the doctor would save during childbirth, mother or baby. My parents told us about it. It was Dads choice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This is EXACTLY why you NEVER
leave your loved one ALONE in a hospital!
You NEVER know WHAT they're doing to them.
Hospitals are NOT safe places.
Just saying the truth.
Buyer BEWARE.
So, what do you suggest, to accompany your loved one into the OR and hang out there during surgery?
Why not? You don't have to see the actual surgery.
I think the point is that you’re not allowed into the OR, dummy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This is EXACTLY why you NEVER
leave your loved one ALONE in a hospital!
You NEVER know WHAT they're doing to them.
Hospitals are NOT safe places.
Just saying the truth.
Buyer BEWARE.
So, what do you suggest, to accompany your loved one into the OR and hang out there during surgery?
Why not? You don't have to see the actual surgery.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This is EXACTLY why you NEVER
leave your loved one ALONE in a hospital!
You NEVER know WHAT they're doing to them.
Hospitals are NOT safe places.
Just saying the truth.
Buyer BEWARE.
So, what do you suggest, to accompany your loved one into the OR and hang out there during surgery?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Interestingly, research shows that while first-year medical students largely find the idea of practicing pelvic exams on women under anesthetic to be morally problematic, the longer they spend in medical school, the less they see it as an issue. Some have labeled this process, which shows up in many aspects of medical education, “ethical erosion.” “
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.slate.com/technology/2018/10/pelvic-exams-unconscious-women-medical-training-consent.html
Ugh. That's disgusting.
Anonymous wrote:
This is EXACTLY why you NEVER
leave your loved one ALONE in a hospital!
You NEVER know WHAT they're doing to them.
Hospitals are NOT safe places.
Just saying the truth.
Buyer BEWARE.
Anonymous wrote:“Interestingly, research shows that while first-year medical students largely find the idea of practicing pelvic exams on women under anesthetic to be morally problematic, the longer they spend in medical school, the less they see it as an issue. Some have labeled this process, which shows up in many aspects of medical education, “ethical erosion.” “
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.slate.com/technology/2018/10/pelvic-exams-unconscious-women-medical-training-consent.html
Anonymous wrote:
This is EXACTLY why you NEVER
leave your loved one ALONE in a hospital!
You NEVER know WHAT they're doing to them.
Hospitals are NOT safe places.
Just saying the truth.
Buyer BEWARE.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems like the definition of a pelvic exam involves some evaluation for diagnostic or treatment purposes. If it's not done for those reasons, isn't that the same thing as some creep in any other non-medical setting doing the same thing to a woman, which would be rape?
That man may also have an MD. And he might commit the crime in his medical practice office. And he might have her consent to preform another procedure or to drug her. What's to stop him from saying that he deemed it "necessary"? It seems to me to be the same thing. (In fact, didn't something similar happen recently with some sort of sports team, maybe gymnastics??)
Can anyone with a legal background explain the difference between a "pelvic exam" that is not performed for the reason of actually diagnosing or treating the patient and "rape"? Why are things not legally crimes if they're committed during business hours in a reputable medical institution? And that's even if the woman has previously consented to being examined at all by med students, which I'm sure the vast majority do/would not if they'd been explicitly asked and/or aware of what they were signing.
exactly, how is this not rape
This is outrageous, and clearly begun when medicine was still a male-dominated profession. If you don't do this to a woman when she's awake, you KNOW why you aren't doing it when she's awake. She'd kill you -- she'd sue you for all you're worth. And like a true cowardly act, it's done when a woman is at her most helpless, unconscious and at your mercy. Imagine trying to get a woman to agree to being looked at by a train of medical students and even residents, and being okay with it. How many women would agree to this sort of invasion?!
Gee, I wonder if they avoid treating known female lawyers in this way?
I think I know the answer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems like the definition of a pelvic exam involves some evaluation for diagnostic or treatment purposes. If it's not done for those reasons, isn't that the same thing as some creep in any other non-medical setting doing the same thing to a woman, which would be rape?
That man may also have an MD. And he might commit the crime in his medical practice office. And he might have her consent to preform another procedure or to drug her. What's to stop him from saying that he deemed it "necessary"? It seems to me to be the same thing. (In fact, didn't something similar happen recently with some sort of sports team, maybe gymnastics??)
Can anyone with a legal background explain the difference between a "pelvic exam" that is not performed for the reason of actually diagnosing or treating the patient and "rape"? Why are things not legally crimes if they're committed during business hours in a reputable medical institution? And that's even if the woman has previously consented to being examined at all by med students, which I'm sure the vast majority do/would not if they'd been explicitly asked and/or aware of what they were signing.
exactly, how is this not rape