Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a popular tweet by Dan Bloom who is advocating that it is Mike Pence due to language(use of lodestar, which is unusual); mentions senate ties, etc. check it out. I will try to post part here. His username is danbl00m
Pence has used the unusual term multiple times in speeches
Anonymous wrote:So there are adults in the White House? What's the chain of command? Who is *really* in charge?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a popular tweet by Dan Bloom who is advocating that it is Mike Pence due to language(use of lodestar, which is unusual); mentions senate ties, etc. check it out. I will try to post part here. His username is danbl00m
Pence has used the unusual term multiple times in speeches
Anonymous wrote:Why should we worry about Trump? Blue wave ahead. Then he’s done.
Anonymous wrote:Not sure why all here are excited. The 25th amendment story was about how all were unwilling to move. The gist is that pres mucks up the conservative agenda (and I think that's good!) and the writer doesn't like that. Seems that the Trump haters here miss all that!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just saw him address this in front of the law enforcement officers. He looks really bad. Sweaty, bloated, bad coloring. This is really wearing on him.
He did look bad.
Anonymous wrote:Just saw him address this in front of the law enforcement officers. He looks really bad. Sweaty, bloated, bad coloring. This is really wearing on him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tweet from Nate silver:
"Yeah, this is probably right. Actuarially speaking, there are lot more nobodies than somebodies.
Also, people who are like "the NYT would NEVER publish it unless it's someone BIG" should remember that this is the NYT op-ed page, which has much laxer standards than the newsroom."
Thoughts?
this piece is HUGE but ONLY if it is written by someone important.
we all know that there are many nobodies working in the WH who loath trump. there have been many many leaks to confirm this. the only (huge) value of this piece comes from a claim that someone with an actual power to subvert the president is doing it. if this turns out to be some random wh aide nobody has heard of it would really stain NYT.
The author is not a nobody. No way, the Times plays that game. The institutional risk is too big. The author is important and this is HUGE.
PP here and i agree. i don't think NYT would publish a nobody the way nate silver is suggesting. and yeah, being an 'appointee' doesn't really cut it. this must be a person known to everyone who follows politics.
Anonymous wrote:We are suppose to be reassured by learning that Trump is, in fact, unfit but they are going to continue business as usual so they can lower taxes and completely deregulate. These people are the opposite of patriots.
Anonymous wrote:Declassification of 20 pages imminent.