Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since race is a social construct, I hardly think “Jews are a race” to be without question and undebatable.
Your statement doesn’t even make sense. Are you saying that the ashkenazi and Sephardim are separate racial groups? You realize that there are Jews who fit into neither category?
Are Muslims a race? Hindus?
Just stop.
I don’t know about Muslims or Hindus, but yes — Sephardic and Ashkenazi Jews (as well as some others) are considered racial groups. I had the Ashkenazi Jew genetic screening panel done when I was pregnant. My 23 and me results say “50% Ashkenazi Jewish.”
You don’t know what you’re talking about.
This is absolutely correct.
Both sets of my maternal great grandparents were Jewish. When they immigrated to the US, they became Christian. If I took a DNA test, it would find 50% ashkenazi Jewish ancestry even though my maternal family has never practiced Judaism. All of their children( my grand parents) and their siblings married other ethnic European Jews from the same country. All practised Christianity when they immigrated here, but are still 100% of ethnic Jewish ancestry including my mother and her cousins.
If you took a DNA test it PROBABLY would find that you have a set of genes that has some statistical commonality with that of the ashkenazi Jews the company happened to sample.
Private gene testing companies can find only such things - not where your ancestors came from or who they were. Much less can they determine what is or is not an ethnic group, a race, or anything else.
I already know what country they came from. For as far as we know (many generations) no ancestors have married outside their country of origin. my mother was the first and it was very hard on her family because it was the end of their strong ethnic line. My grandparents and their siblings were very fond and proud of their country of origin.
Anonymous wrote:
- non-religious at all but cultural Muslim with Ashkenazi DNA according to 23andMe
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sure, but studies have shown Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews have remarkable genetic homogeneity.
Also, PP: I am Jewish, not alt right. I am proud of my Jewish ethnicity and claim it, regardless of the fact that anti-Semites have exploited it to try to exterminate my grandparents and other relatives.
We are strong and proud and reject your attempts to deny our ethnic identity.
Its remarkable, I suppose, that they have 60% mideastern ancestry (probably) after 2000 years. But they are still 40% european ancestry, and anyway, all that is, is a certain degree of genetici homogeneity in a cultural religious group. It does not make it an "ethnic group".
Ok, then bring your case to those who have actually studied this.
here ya go
https://www.zdnet.com/article/scientists-ethnicity-may-not-exist-genetically-speaking/
DP... I didn't read the entire study, but this caught my attention: they studied Central Asia: the Turkic and Indo-Iranian groups.
That area straddles two continents, and with the migration pattern of both Europeans and Asians, it would be harder to find a distinct marker that identifies them as white or asian. They are going to be a mish/mash of both, and thus have more differences with both groups.
Find me a peer reviewed genetic paper that contradicts it.
contradicts what?
Contradicts the paper that says ethnicity may not exist genetically speaking?
Are you one of the folks claiming to be ethnically ashkenazi? You realize you are helping to disprove a stereotype?![]()
nope.
Oh goodie, a goyish kopf.
![]()
While genetics doesn't identify "race", it does identify your ancestry. Call it ancestry or race, but it defines where your genetics came from, Europe, Asia, Africa...
IMO, "race" doesn't define your intelligence, ability or character, obviously, but for the sake of this discussion, race (or call it ancestry) does exist.
http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/science-genetics-reshaping-race-debate-21st-century/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sure, but studies have shown Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews have remarkable genetic homogeneity.
Also, PP: I am Jewish, not alt right. I am proud of my Jewish ethnicity and claim it, regardless of the fact that anti-Semites have exploited it to try to exterminate my grandparents and other relatives.
We are strong and proud and reject your attempts to deny our ethnic identity.
Its remarkable, I suppose, that they have 60% mideastern ancestry (probably) after 2000 years. But they are still 40% european ancestry, and anyway, all that is, is a certain degree of genetici homogeneity in a cultural religious group. It does not make it an "ethnic group".
Ok, then bring your case to those who have actually studied this.
here ya go
https://www.zdnet.com/article/scientists-ethnicity-may-not-exist-genetically-speaking/
DP... I didn't read the entire study, but this caught my attention: they studied Central Asia: the Turkic and Indo-Iranian groups.
That area straddles two continents, and with the migration pattern of both Europeans and Asians, it would be harder to find a distinct marker that identifies them as white or asian. They are going to be a mish/mash of both, and thus have more differences with both groups.
Find me a peer reviewed genetic paper that contradicts it.
contradicts what?
Contradicts the paper that says ethnicity may not exist genetically speaking?
Are you one of the folks claiming to be ethnically ashkenazi? You realize you are helping to disprove a stereotype?![]()
nope.
Oh goodie, a goyish kopf.
![]()
While genetics doesn't identify "race", it does identify your ancestry. Call it ancestry or race, but it defines where your genetics came from, Europe, Asia, Africa...
IMO, "race" doesn't define your intelligence, ability or character, obviously, but for the sake of this discussion, race (or call it ancestry) does exist.
http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/science-genetics-reshaping-race-debate-21st-century/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not sure what this point of view serves, except for Jewish people to be able to claim “racism” when faced with prejudice. But it’s both wrong and not necessary. You CAN be Jewish and any racial/ethnic group. You can also fully make it argument that it’s wrong to be prejudiced against someone on the basis of religion/culture. It’s not a contest.
+1
It's like a Venn Diagram. Judaism is not a race. You can be Jewish and Black, Asian, whatever. You can be Sephardic and Ashkenazi ethnically, but not Jewish - in the sense that you don't believe in the religion. You can be both, or none. They can overlap but they're not one and the same.
- non-religious at all but cultural Muslim with Ashkenazi DNA according to 23andMe
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sure, but studies have shown Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews have remarkable genetic homogeneity.
Also, PP: I am Jewish, not alt right. I am proud of my Jewish ethnicity and claim it, regardless of the fact that anti-Semites have exploited it to try to exterminate my grandparents and other relatives.
We are strong and proud and reject your attempts to deny our ethnic identity.
Its remarkable, I suppose, that they have 60% mideastern ancestry (probably) after 2000 years. But they are still 40% european ancestry, and anyway, all that is, is a certain degree of genetici homogeneity in a cultural religious group. It does not make it an "ethnic group".
Ok, then bring your case to those who have actually studied this.
here ya go
https://www.zdnet.com/article/scientists-ethnicity-may-not-exist-genetically-speaking/
DP... I didn't read the entire study, but this caught my attention: they studied Central Asia: the Turkic and Indo-Iranian groups.
That area straddles two continents, and with the migration pattern of both Europeans and Asians, it would be harder to find a distinct marker that identifies them as white or asian. They are going to be a mish/mash of both, and thus have more differences with both groups.
Find me a peer reviewed genetic paper that contradicts it.
contradicts what?
Contradicts the paper that says ethnicity may not exist genetically speaking?
Are you one of the folks claiming to be ethnically ashkenazi? You realize you are helping to disprove a stereotype?![]()
nope.
Oh goodie, a goyish kopf.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just do not see it. It sounds like white supremacy garbage. It’s a religion. You choose to believe or not.
I actually think many Jews believe themselves to be a separate race.
yes, Jews have been influenced by living in the West for hundreds of years, and especially since the mid 19th century have been influenced by western concepts of "race". Just as others have been influenced by the western concept of "religion"
Our own texts make clear neither are authentic to us. Jews who worshiped idols were still Jews. But Ruth, born a moabite, was also a Jew, and the ancestor of King David, the father of our line of kings, and, in time to come, of the messiah.
We are a people. An am kadosh. A holy people. Not a religion, not a race.
oh lordy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just do not see it. It sounds like white supremacy garbage. It’s a religion. You choose to believe or not.
I actually think many Jews believe themselves to be a separate race.
yes, Jews have been influenced by living in the West for hundreds of years, and especially since the mid 19th century have been influenced by western concepts of "race". Just as others have been influenced by the western concept of "religion"
Our own texts make clear neither are authentic to us. Jews who worshiped idols were still Jews. But Ruth, born a moabite, was also a Jew, and the ancestor of King David, the father of our line of kings, and, in time to come, of the messiah.
We are a people. An am kadosh. A holy people. Not a religion, not a race.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just do not see it. It sounds like white supremacy garbage. It’s a religion. You choose to believe or not.
I actually think many Jews believe themselves to be a separate race.
yes, Jews have been influenced by living in the West for hundreds of years, and especially since the mid 19th century have been influenced by western concepts of "race". Just as others have been influenced by the western concept of "religion"
Our own texts make clear neither are authentic to us. Jews who worshiped idols were still Jews. But Ruth, born a moabite, was also a Jew, and the ancestor of King David, the father of our line of kings, and, in time to come, of the messiah.
We are a people. An am kadosh. A holy people. Not a religion, not a race.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just do not see it. It sounds like white supremacy garbage. It’s a religion. You choose to believe or not.
I actually think many Jews believe themselves to be a separate race.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sure, but studies have shown Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews have remarkable genetic homogeneity.
Also, PP: I am Jewish, not alt right. I am proud of my Jewish ethnicity and claim it, regardless of the fact that anti-Semites have exploited it to try to exterminate my grandparents and other relatives.
We are strong and proud and reject your attempts to deny our ethnic identity.
Its remarkable, I suppose, that they have 60% mideastern ancestry (probably) after 2000 years. But they are still 40% european ancestry, and anyway, all that is, is a certain degree of genetici homogeneity in a cultural religious group. It does not make it an "ethnic group".
Ok, then bring your case to those who have actually studied this.
here ya go
https://www.zdnet.com/article/scientists-ethnicity-may-not-exist-genetically-speaking/
DP... I didn't read the entire study, but this caught my attention: they studied Central Asia: the Turkic and Indo-Iranian groups.
That area straddles two continents, and with the migration pattern of both Europeans and Asians, it would be harder to find a distinct marker that identifies them as white or asian. They are going to be a mish/mash of both, and thus have more differences with both groups.
Find me a peer reviewed genetic paper that contradicts it.
contradicts what?
Contradicts the paper that says ethnicity may not exist genetically speaking?
Are you one of the folks claiming to be ethnically ashkenazi? You realize you are helping to disprove a stereotype?![]()
nope.
Anonymous wrote:Just do not see it. It sounds like white supremacy garbage. It’s a religion. You choose to believe or not.