Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have 32 kids in 3rd grade. Nothing new here. MCPS sucks
+1. MCPS parents can no longer brag about how great their schools are, they are an embarassment.
Anonymous wrote:We have 32 kids in 3rd grade. Nothing new here. MCPS sucks
Anonymous wrote:We have 32 kids in 3rd grade. Nothing new here. MCPS sucks
Anonymous wrote:+1000
Everyone needs to write the state super, county super and board about this. It’s beyond time.
Lower performing schools actually have lower class sizes because there is additional funding to support that. Is that equitable? Based on how you are defining equity, it really isn't. However, I am fine with that because that policy actually benefits kids in lower performing schools, and I agree with the policy rationales trying to give such schools/kids a leg up.The looks it is counterproductive to try to achieve equity in ways that harm wealthier schools without helping poorer schools. Keeping a W school from having an aide doesn't benefit your child.
The above. Lower performing schools, which tend to be in less wealthy areas, sometimes have Focus or Title 1 designations and the class sizes are capped much lower. My Bethesda child may not need that same leg up, but it is still just as depressing to go into a classroom of 28ish students and 1 teacher and see how my child is basically getting zero face time with the teacher some days. My child needs learn to read, write, and do math too. An aide would greatly help this (although it would still be a lot of bodies in a small classroom where the Focus and Title 1 schools might only have 18 in the classroom.) So why can't there be lower caps on lower performing schools AND aides in the classrooms of wealthier schools when you have 30 in a room? That would be MORE equitable.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One advantage of DCPS over MCPS for ES is class size. My kids are at an upper NW ES and have around 21-23 kids, Lower grades have an aide too.
And there are often two adults since PTAs can fund aides. MoCo prohibits this based on notions of equity and not wanting to worsen the achievement gap, although this measure only stunts the achievement of better performing schools and doesn't actually help anyone in schools that are struggling.
MCPS prohibits this on the basis of equity, full stop. And rightfully so.
That's like saying there should be an extra 25% tax on the rich. But, rather than using that money to help the poor, build roads, fund healthcare, etc - you simply burn the money.
The rich having less is more "equitable," even though it hasn't help the poor or society more broadly in the process.
No. It’s basically to avoid creating private public schools, where wealthy families are able to fund their schools themselves and eventually seek to lower taxes to not have to fund schools in poorer neighborhoods. It also makes sure that funding decisions are centralized and traceable to a central authority for accountability and mission
We are talking about having an aide in the classroom to assist the teacher. That hardly renders a public school private as wouldn't be near enough for people to decide schools didn't need to be adequately funded. And as for accountability, the aide is accountable first to the teacher who is in charge of the teacher and is next managed by the principal (and assistants and others school management) who is then managed by the various layers of MoCo bureaucracy.
There is more than to ensure that an aide - who would barely set any classroom policies, never mind anything broader - remains accountable and consistent with the mission.
And why is that equitable in terms of my kid’s school which has much less money in the pta.
The looks it is counterproductive to try to achieve equity in ways that harm wealthier schools without helping poorer schools. Keeping a W school from having an aide doesn't benefit your child.
Lower performing schools actually have lower class sizes because there is additional funding to support that. Is that equitable? Based on how you are defining equity, it really isn't. However, I am fine with that because that policy actually benefits kids in lower performing schools, and I agree with the policy rationales trying to give such schools/kids a leg up.
But preventing an aide in wealthier schools doesn't actually help anyone. It just hinders some people and I don't believe that the achievement gap should be closed by, in part, preventing wealthier students from achieving as much as possible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We moved to the Bethesda area a month ago and were shocked to hear from the principal that classes had 28-29 kids, one class had 30 kids. This is not what appears on the website and what we were told. We moved from an area in the Midwest with decent public schools and never more than 22-23 kids in elementary. I was an educator in my "first career" and there are reams of research on why this is bad for many reasons. No advanced nation with good schools has classes this big since it is well-known that small class sizes are much better for kids.
Is it worth talking to the Principal about this? Or the PTA?
Could anyone help point me in the right direction of who I should email?
We moved to London 2 years ago, almost every school has exactly 30 kids in every class and there are waiting lists for every grade level at most schools. Every time a child moves there is a new kid in the spot just a day or 2 later.There are 4 classes at each grade level and 2 teaching assistants for each grade level who basically pull kids out for extra help in small groups.
The class sizes are “big” compared to US, but the education my children are getting is fantastic. I seriously don’t know where my kids can go to school when we move back the MCPS schools we toured were really sad looking in comparison, facilities and programming. I don’t think class size is the problem.
You forgot the part about the teachers aide plus reading specialists, designated math and science teachers in UK schools. Assuming you are talking age 4-7. then second teacher drops but subject teachers never do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We moved to the Bethesda area a month ago and were shocked to hear from the principal that classes had 28-29 kids, one class had 30 kids. This is not what appears on the website and what we were told. We moved from an area in the Midwest with decent public schools and never more than 22-23 kids in elementary. I was an educator in my "first career" and there are reams of research on why this is bad for many reasons. No advanced nation with good schools has classes this big since it is well-known that small class sizes are much better for kids.
Is it worth talking to the Principal about this? Or the PTA?
Could anyone help point me in the right direction of who I should email?
We moved to London 2 years ago, almost every school has exactly 30 kids in every class and there are waiting lists for every grade level at most schools. Every time a child moves there is a new kid in the spot just a day or 2 later.There are 4 classes at each grade level and 2 teaching assistants for each grade level who basically pull kids out for extra help in small groups.
The class sizes are “big” compared to US, but the education my children are getting is fantastic. I seriously don’t know where my kids can go to school when we move back the MCPS schools we toured were really sad looking in comparison, facilities and programming. I don’t think class size is the problem.
You forgot the part about the teachers aide plus reading specialists, designated math and science teachers in UK schools. Assuming you are talking age 4-7. then second teacher drops but subject teachers never do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We moved to the Bethesda area a month ago and were shocked to hear from the principal that classes had 28-29 kids, one class had 30 kids. This is not what appears on the website and what we were told. We moved from an area in the Midwest with decent public schools and never more than 22-23 kids in elementary. I was an educator in my "first career" and there are reams of research on why this is bad for many reasons. No advanced nation with good schools has classes this big since it is well-known that small class sizes are much better for kids.
Is it worth talking to the Principal about this? Or the PTA?
Could anyone help point me in the right direction of who I should email?
We moved to London 2 years ago, almost every school has exactly 30 kids in every class and there are waiting lists for every grade level at most schools. Every time a child moves there is a new kid in the spot just a day or 2 later.There are 4 classes at each grade level and 2 teaching assistants for each grade level who basically pull kids out for extra help in small groups.
The class sizes are “big” compared to US, but the education my children are getting is fantastic. I seriously don’t know where my kids can go to school when we move back the MCPS schools we toured were really sad looking in comparison, facilities and programming. I don’t think class size is the problem.