Anonymous wrote:I think it's pretty obvious why they got married--Meghan was approaching middle-age and took the best option for boosting her status and Harry was getting desperate. Not only was he approaching the age where most men are already married (like his brother and friends), but he needed to lock down a wife soon or else the speculation about him being gay would get too loud.
Anonymous wrote:After Meghan, Harry doesn’t want Chelsy—that would be a serious downgrade. Chelsy looks like an old horse who has been ridden hard and long.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The projection here is ridiculous. I think she looked lovely and a bit nervous, so her husband was solicitous in trying to put her at ease.
+1
It’s hilarious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meghan needs a more vivid pink.
![]()
Absolutely. She would be a knock out in the right shades of pink.
My husband pointed out how scrawny/bony her calves—below the knee legs are. They are not the best set of legs.
Huh? Her legs are totally proportionate to the rest of her body.
Huh? Her calves are stick-like. So are mine, so I noticed. Stick-like isn't bad, but there are cuter calves out there.
The rest of her body isn't stick-like.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meghan needs a more vivid pink.
![]()
Absolutely. She would be a knock out in the right shades of pink.
My husband pointed out how scrawny/bony her calves—below the knee legs are. They are not the best set of legs.
Huh? Her legs are totally proportionate to the rest of her body.
Huh? Her calves are stick-like. So are mine, so I noticed. Stick-like isn't bad, but there are cuter calves out there.
The rest of her body isn't stick-like.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meghan needs a more vivid pink.
![]()
Absolutely. She would be a knock out in the right shades of pink.
My husband pointed out how scrawny/bony her calves—below the knee legs are. They are not the best set of legs.
Huh? Her legs are totally proportionate to the rest of her body.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meghan needs a more vivid pink.
![]()
Absolutely. She would be a knock out in the right shades of pink.
My husband pointed out how scrawny/bony her calves—below the knee legs are. They are not the best set of legs.
Huh? Her legs are totally proportionate to the rest of her body.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meghan needs a more vivid pink.
![]()
Absolutely. She would be a knock out in the right shades of pink.
My husband pointed out how scrawny/bony her calves—below the knee legs are. They are not the best set of legs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Meghan needs a more vivid pink.
![]()
Absolutely. She would be a knock out in the right shades of pink.
Anonymous wrote:Meghan needs a more vivid pink.
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow so much racist
So it's racist to say she looked better without the deep tan? Get help.
I don’t think it’s racist and I agree that she looked both tan/washed out. Pink is not her color.
It is that dusty rose color that is the "it" color this year but looks so bad on everyone except very pale redheads or very pale blondes.
Meghan needs a more vibrant pink, or even a true pastel pink. The current pale pink has too many dusty undertones to look good on anyone