Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm the PP who knows a bunch of people who skipped 3+ grades.
I skipped 3 grades myself. I was tested PG, both WISC and SB (~170 IQ). That background might mean that I've ended up meeting more people who have been radically accelerated, or perhaps more people who were once accelerated end up talking about it in my presence. (Otherwise you'd never really be able to tell in an adult.)
[…]
My experience is that most radical acceleration is either three grades, or something totally off-the-charts, like going to college at age 11. There doesn't seem to be much in-between.
Kids who are accelerated by 3+ grades generally have individual IQ testing done as part of the justification for that acceleration. I don't think a grade skip that large is likely to be done for kids who have less than a 160 IQ. If you're at 145, you can probably do all right with sufficiently challenging curriculum in your grade or maybe one grade up (I have a sibling with a high 140s IQ, did great with a single grade of acceleration).
PP from overseas. Extremely interesting. We were just offered to accelerate DS by one additional year. We are still debating and may defer until next year as we would like DS to settle a bit on the social emotional side. The main challenge we are facing is really the asynchronous development and we try to adjust accordingly based on what we see in DS's development. As you rightly point out, it really does matter at this age as it hurts to feel so different (not to mention teenage years). Did you skip one grade at a time or two/ three at once?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:PP here. You don’t have a very good sense of how probability works.
Even in a well educated area like DC, the chances of meeting that many people in the consensus PG range (160s or 170) IQ is quite low. I agree with the PP who said a small, rarified environment like a hard sciences or math PhD program is a different matter entirely. You probably also met a few at your HYP, but saying you met that many PG people in your everyday life in this area is ridiculous, unless you work at one of a very few jobs here that require exceedingly high level skills.
Listen, I have no reason to lie to you about myself. I was tested for a magnet program as a kid and scored 147. My sister was tested for the same program and scored 153.
You just seem to be grossly exaggerating the intellectual ability of the people you meet. That’s all I’m arguing.
Anonymous wrote:I'm the PP who knows a bunch of people who skipped 3+ grades.
I skipped 3 grades myself. I was tested PG, both WISC and SB (~170 IQ). That background might mean that I've ended up meeting more people who have been radically accelerated, or perhaps more people who were once accelerated end up talking about it in my presence. (Otherwise you'd never really be able to tell in an adult.)
At the modest-sized suburban high schools I attended (one hometown public, one public STEM magnet, both smaller than a typical DC-area public school), each had another kid with a 3-grade skip. Locally there was also one family with incredibly gifted children; they finished college while still in their teens (and went to public schools where radical acceleration was allowed).
At my university (an Ivy), I met a recent grad (an employee of campus IT) who had a 3-grade skip. I also met a teenaged math grad student. I remember the university paper having mentioned other young entrants, but I don't recall how many.
In my post-college DC-area startup with a relatively small number of employees, there were two other employees who had a 3-grade skip, who attended Maryland public schools and later UMCP.
As I've grown older, accelerated folks stop being obvious -- i.e., you don't notice coworkers who can't legally drink, for instance. But in the (STEM) business world since, I've met a surprising number of people who, over a casual business dinner, have ended up mentioning their own radical acceleration when we're chatting about educating our kids. A few of them grew up in the APAC region, but the rest are US-raised.
My experience is that most radical acceleration is either three grades, or something totally off-the-charts, like going to college at age 11. There doesn't seem to be much in-between.
Kids who are accelerated by 3+ grades generally have individual IQ testing done as part of the justification for that acceleration. I don't think a grade skip that large is likely to be done for kids who have less than a 160 IQ. If you're at 145, you can probably do all right with sufficiently challenging curriculum in your grade or maybe one grade up (I have a sibling with a high 140s IQ, did great with a single grade of acceleration).
Anonymous wrote:I'm the PP who knows a bunch of people who skipped 3+ grades.
I skipped 3 grades myself. I was tested PG, both WISC and SB (~170 IQ). That background might mean that I've ended up meeting more people who have been radically accelerated, or perhaps more people who were once accelerated end up talking about it in my presence. (Otherwise you'd never really be able to tell in an adult.)
[…]
My experience is that most radical acceleration is either three grades, or something totally off-the-charts, like going to college at age 11. There doesn't seem to be much in-between.
Kids who are accelerated by 3+ grades generally have individual IQ testing done as part of the justification for that acceleration. I don't think a grade skip that large is likely to be done for kids who have less than a 160 IQ. If you're at 145, you can probably do all right with sufficiently challenging curriculum in your grade or maybe one grade up (I have a sibling with a high 140s IQ, did great with a single grade of acceleration).
Anonymous wrote:I'm the PP who was skeptical about OP's claims.
Sure, what you said makes sense.
Here's the thing about what OP said: Your IQ exists in approximately 1 in every 650,000 people. The probability OP knows more than 1 or 2 people like you is miniscule. Frankly, the probability that both you and OP (who claims she's PG) have an IQ of 170 is essentially 0.
I don't call BS on you; you have no reason to lie. I do call BS on OP, and have for the whole thread.
Anyway, my IQ is in the high 140s and you're right that I did well with acceleration in the context of a strong school. I found my NE prep school challenging. That said, I found college (at a top 20 research university) easy, and wasn't challenged again until my PhD program.
Anonymous wrote:Great post. good luck abroad. Is this an int'l program or mainstream school in Asia or EU, sounds great but also in a traditional, structured school way.
Quick question - did you find a progressive K-12 better or worse for a HG or PG young kid or a traditional/more structured K-12? We may also have elements of 2E given family history on one side.
Anonymous wrote:Edlin School in Reston, VA near Vienna. It is lesser known, smaller and gifted school just like Nysmith. Its tuition is much less, about $17,000 less. When my DC was there at 6th grade, a girl at 4 th grade was taking English and Math with them. Their 6th grade studies 8-10th grade materials. Several kids came to Big 3s (Edlin school is k-8) that I know of all told me that school was very easy for them. As a matter of fact, they didn't learn anything new for a year or two in the Big 3s.
You can compare with Basis McLean, Nysmith and Edlin to see which one is best suitable to your PG child. The CTY route is too clumsy. The families whose kids are taking classes and summer camps or summer classes at CTY must joggle the schedules, online classes, no real interactions with classmates, or a school like environment. [/quote]
Disagree. Admin. problems. Read greatschools.org and yelp (especially the "not recommended" reviews) and other sites first.