Anonymous wrote:I love San Francisco but I would be hesitant to go now.
They have to clean up the homeless problem and deal with the health and safety issues like junkies shooting up on the streets and human feces everywhere
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why the uptick of homeless in SF?
Democrats in power for ever, no one dares to do the hard work.
no
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why the uptick of homeless in SF?
The city council protect their choice not to be contributing members of society. Instead they are allowed to camp on city streets, collect their welfare and socialize all day.
Why hold a job?
Indeed - why? can't afford housing in the city anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump is going to have the EPA sanction San Francisco and have the p
EPA so something useful for a change https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/09/18/donald-trump-threatens-epa-action-over-homelessness-san-francisco/2346006001/
Yes, he said that the homeless people are pollution there and is going to get the EPA to go after them. Lovely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why the uptick of homeless in SF?
Democrats in power for ever, no one dares to do the hard work.
Anonymous wrote:I go to SF with some frequency, alone, with husband, and with my young kids. SF has definitely gotten grittier in recent years. I like it, we are even low key considering moving there. But I think people who deny that SF has changed are either oblivious or politically motivated.
Anonymous wrote:Trump is going to have the EPA sanction San Francisco and have the p
EPA so something useful for a change https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/09/18/donald-trump-threatens-epa-action-over-homelessness-san-francisco/2346006001/
Anonymous wrote:I am the original poster. I flew out alone w two kids and spent the first day in SF with them on my own until my spouse flew out on a later flight. We had a great time - glad we went.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why the uptick of homeless in SF?
I think the problem is that SF is too quick to let people who are mentally ill in a hostile way stay on the street.
I think New York, Boston and Chicago have better strategies for getting hostile homeless people off the streets.
I rarely run into a poorly behaved homeless person in most cities, but I always run into them in San Francisco.
Letting people who are mentally ill in that way fester on the street is an abdication of responsibility.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why the uptick of homeless in SF?
The city council protect their choice not to be contributing members of society. Instead they are allowed to camp on city streets, collect their welfare and socialize all day.
Why hold a job?