Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread reads like Chicago's cheap and gaudy advertisement/promotional brochure.
No it just shows how a few people who hate the school try and derail every thread about the school. If you tried that with Dartmouth or Notredame or Tufts or Tulane even that STD capital Dook, you would get an even more violent reaction. It's called school pride. UChicago didn't have any for many many years but now has it in spades.
Not really. You never see anyone wearing shirts for Chicago. There’s some shame there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread reads like Chicago's cheap and gaudy advertisement/promotional brochure.
No it just shows how a few people who hate the school try and derail every thread about the school. If you tried that with Dartmouth or Notredame or Tufts or Tulane even that STD capital Dook, you would get an even more violent reaction. It's called school pride. UChicago didn't have any for many many years but now has it in spades.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread reads like Chicago's cheap and gaudy advertisement/promotional brochure.
No it just shows how a few people who hate the school try and derail every thread about the school. If you tried that with Dartmouth or Notredame or Tufts or Tulane even that STD capital Dook, you would get an even more violent reaction. It's called school pride. UChicago didn't have any for many many years but now has it in spades.
Anonymous wrote:This thread reads like Chicago's cheap and gaudy advertisement/promotional brochure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A recently admitted young lady detailed on College Confidential tonight why she elected not to attend. Dissenting opinion of Chicago is not allowed; she was banned and the thread promptly locked.
https://talk.collegeconfidential.com/university-chicago/2079436-why-i-turned-down-chicago-for-a-lower-ranked-college-p1.html
She said, "Chicago told me they love a good debate, thrive off feisty skepticism and constructive criticism, so the negative energy is surprising."
Chicago loves critical intellectual discussions - unless it's about them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A recently admitted young lady detailed on College Confidential tonight why she elected not to attend. Dissenting opinion of Chicago is not allowed; she was banned and the thread promptly locked.
https://talk.collegeconfidential.com/university-chicago/2079436-why-i-turned-down-chicago-for-a-lower-ranked-college-p1.html
See, there you go again with your pure Nonsense. This was probably you wasn't it? That's the only way you would know that there user was banned. Lol. And it was the moderator who locked down the thread and banned your ass because you violated their rules. . Lies, Lies and more Lies. You made an account specially to rant about UChicago..
Pathetic. And I am sure you didn't even get in. You just wanted to rant. You deserve what you got. Now eff off.
Anonymous wrote:A recently admitted young lady detailed on College Confidential tonight why she elected not to attend. Dissenting opinion of Chicago is not allowed; she was banned and the thread promptly locked.
https://talk.collegeconfidential.com/university-chicago/2079436-why-i-turned-down-chicago-for-a-lower-ranked-college-p1.html
Anonymous wrote:A recently admitted young lady detailed on College Confidential tonight why she elected not to attend. Dissenting opinion of Chicago is not allowed; she was banned and the thread promptly locked.
https://talk.collegeconfidential.com/university-chicago/2079436-why-i-turned-down-chicago-for-a-lower-ranked-college-p1.html
Anonymous wrote:Most college profs send their kids to slac, not ivy.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/where-professors-send-their-children-to-college/