Anonymous wrote: ...it doesn't mean people in his district will go hungry...
Anonymous wrote:I can honestly say that I'm less upset by Trayon's White's comments/actions than by the repetitive attempts here to say that they "aren't that bad."
I actually don't care what happens with Trayon White as an individual. What I would like is recognition that anti-semitism among people of color is on the rise, with the cause of the Palestinians a convenient cover for those accusations. For American Jews, it increasingly feels like (mostly mild, "all Jews are like this") anti-semitism is ok on the left and the right. It's alarming.
When you combine it with the rise in real anti-Jewish hate crimes here and around the world, Jews aren't sure what to think. It certainly feels like Jews are the last group anyone wants to defend ...
Anonymous wrote:Maybe Aaron Holmes will see this chaos and controversy as an opportunity and challenge White who won unopposed in 2016.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When you go fishing for anti Semitism in a situation where it's exceptionally hard to prove that the intent was indeed to be anti Semitic , you end up with mofos twisting into pretzels because they've not gotten the outcome they hoped for .
You guys chose to make a big deal out of a situation that from the onset didn't need to evolve into the melodrama it's become . I'm convinced Mr White enjoys being a professional troll at this point , why shouldn't he? He stands to face little to no political fallout .
Who says one has to INTEND to be antisemtitic in order to BE antisemtitc? There are plenty of people who think less of black people, as an entire group. They don't necessarily intend to....they just do. And that makes them racist.
It's sad the degree to which some liberals on this forum twist them into pretzels because they can't face that Democrats, whom they consider so superior, could actually be antisemites. And so the excuses start. Either the guy is an idiotic. Or he's just ignorant. Or he is insensitive to antisemtism but not an actual antisemite. And now, he didn't INTEND to be antisemtitic.
The next time someone makes a bigoted remark against blacks, Muslims, whatever, I am going to defend him by insisting he is not prejudiced.....just that he ignorant or insensitive. Or that the struggle of blacks or Muslims isn't "his struggle." Or that he is just stupid. But racist? Naaaah.
I'm tired of people trying to equate anti Semitism to racism or to always compare themselves to blacks . Even by the most conservative standards , Jews haven't been subjected to what blacks have and continue to be subjected to in this country . Nice try
Oh, oh....someone is trying to start up the Oppression Olympics.
Anonymous wrote:Jeff you're making way too much sense for these assholes , if there's a demographic in this country that really needs to be extremely careful it's Jews . As America becomes increasingly less white , this sort of faux controversy will not move anyone . It's beyond obvious that the anti Semitic implication of Mr white comments wasn't what the 'tribe' makesnit out to be and yet .....
Jeff nailed it.jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Post is on his ass and councilmembers are no longer coddling him. He’s done. The violation of campaign-finance law requiring constituent-service funds to be spent on DC residents is the nail in the coffin.
How long have you lived in "Dee-Cee"? The disbursement from the constituent service fund will result in a slap on the wrist at most. The more that the Post, Jewish organizations, others are 'on his ass', the more Trayon's base will see him as standing up to the Man. We've seen this playbook run in Ward 8 before.
DP. What are you saying? That if Jews stand up to an antisemite, the voters in Ward 8 dig in their heels? It sounds as if you're saying that there is so much hostility toward Jews from Ward 8 poor blacks (be honest.....that's who lives in Ward 8) that they'll WANT to keep the antisemite in office.
White is not out doing overtly anti-Semitic things. For instance, he is not marching in Charlottesville yelling, "Jews will not replace us". Rather, he made an ignorant statement that he didn't know had anti-Semitic implications and for which he apologized. His supporters don't see "Jews standing up to an anti-Semite", but rather people who have never been involved in helping Ward 8 launching unfair attacks on their Council Member. You may not agree with their perspective, and I don't, but it is still their perspective whether you agree with it or not. Ward 8 residents will not increase their support for White because they are hostile to Jews, but because like most people, they resent attacks by outsiders.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Post is on his ass and councilmembers are no longer coddling him. He’s done. The violation of campaign-finance law requiring constituent-service funds to be spent on DC residents is the nail in the coffin.
How long have you lived in "Dee-Cee"? The disbursement from the constituent service fund will result in a slap on the wrist at most. The more that the Post, Jewish organizations, others are 'on his ass', the more Trayon's base will see him as standing up to the Man. We've seen this playbook run in Ward 8 before.
DP. What are you saying? That if Jews stand up to an antisemite, the voters in Ward 8 dig in their heels? It sounds as if you're saying that there is so much hostility toward Jews from Ward 8 poor blacks (be honest.....that's who lives in Ward 8) that they'll WANT to keep the antisemite in office.
White is not out doing overtly anti-Semitic things. For instance, he is not marching in Charlottesville yelling, "Jews will not replace us". Rather, he made an ignorant statement that he didn't know had anti-Semitic implications and for which he apologized. His supporters don't see "Jews standing up to an anti-Semite", but rather people who have never been involved in helping Ward 8 launching unfair attacks on their Council Member. You may not agree with their perspective, and I don't, but it is still their perspective whether you agree with it or not. Ward 8 residents will not increase their support for White because they are hostile to Jews, but because like most people, they resent attacks by outsiders.
Anonymous wrote:You seem more annoyed with the Jews for whom "an apology isn't enough" (actually, repeated apologies for repeated antisemitic behavior) than the repeated antisemtic behavior of a DC councilman. You ask,,,,,how many apologies are enough? I ask....how many indications of antisemtitsm are enough?
And it doesn't mean people in his district will go hungry if we get rid of the antisemtie. They will get another councilman who will represent them - one who doesn't diss Jews all the time. It is wrong to teach that bigotry toward one group of people is OK as long as your constituents are being served.
And finally, your response just proves it: antisemtism isn't all that serious to (many) DC liberals. They will overlook the most heinous behavior (like that from Farrakhan) as long as he's helping black people. That is totally unacceptable to many Jews. I know you would rather Jews keep accepting, tolerating, being patient - whatever - with antisemties. History has taught Jews that being "accepting" of racist attitudes toward them does not work.
The ironic thing is that you are quick to pounce on black or Muslim bigotry but expect all sorts of "forgiveness" and "patience" of and toward antisemties.
P.S. Even your examole, "he toured the Holocaust Memorial and that wasn't enough" fails to mention that he cared so little that he walked out in the middle of it and waited on the sidewalk. That spit-in-the-face was especially bad since he had just "aplogized" to Jews for his earlier antisemtitic comment (which he said he didn't know was antisemitic).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When you go fishing for anti Semitism in a situation where it's exceptionally hard to prove that the intent was indeed to be anti Semitic , you end up with mofos twisting into pretzels because they've not gotten the outcome they hoped for .
You guys chose to make a big deal out of a situation that from the onset didn't need to evolve into the melodrama it's become . I'm convinced Mr White enjoys being a professional troll at this point , why shouldn't he? He stands to face little to no political fallout .
Who says one has to INTEND to be antisemtitic in order to BE antisemtitc? There are plenty of people who think less of black people, as an entire group. They don't necessarily intend to....they just do. And that makes them racist.
It's sad the degree to which some liberals on this forum twist them into pretzels because they can't face that Democrats, whom they consider so superior, could actually be antisemites. And so the excuses start. Either the guy is an idiotic. Or he's just ignorant. Or he is insensitive to antisemtism but not an actual antisemite. And now, he didn't INTEND to be antisemtitic.
The next time someone makes a bigoted remark against blacks, Muslims, whatever, I am going to defend him by insisting he is not prejudiced.....just that he ignorant or insensitive. Or that the struggle of blacks or Muslims isn't "his struggle." Or that he is just stupid. But racist? Naaaah.
I'm tired of people trying to equate anti Semitism to racism or to always compare themselves to blacks . Even by the most conservative standards , Jews haven't been subjected to what blacks have and continue to be subjected to in this country . Nice try
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When you go fishing for anti Semitism in a situation where it's exceptionally hard to prove that the intent was indeed to be anti Semitic , you end up with mofos twisting into pretzels because they've not gotten the outcome they hoped for .
You guys chose to make a big deal out of a situation that from the onset didn't need to evolve into the melodrama it's become . I'm convinced Mr White enjoys being a professional troll at this point , why shouldn't he? He stands to face little to no political fallout .
Who says one has to INTEND to be antisemtitic in order to BE antisemtitc? There are plenty of people who think less of black people, as an entire group. They don't necessarily intend to....they just do. And that makes them racist.
It's sad the degree to which some liberals on this forum twist them into pretzels because they can't face that Democrats, whom they consider so superior, could actually be antisemites. And so the excuses start. Either the guy is an idiotic. Or he's just ignorant. Or he is insensitive to antisemtism but not an actual antisemite. And now, he didn't INTEND to be antisemtitic.
The next time someone makes a bigoted remark against blacks, Muslims, whatever, I am going to defend him by insisting he is not prejudiced.....just that he ignorant or insensitive. Or that the struggle of blacks or Muslims isn't "his struggle." Or that he is just stupid. But racist? Naaaah.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Post is on his ass and councilmembers are no longer coddling him. He’s done. The violation of campaign-finance law requiring constituent-service funds to be spent on DC residents is the nail in the coffin.
Somehow that doesn't make me feel better. Just shows that being an antisemite is fine and dandy, and it will be emphasized that he's being fired because of campaign finance laws, and nothing to do with his bigotry against Jews. The message is: dump all the shit you want on Jews, and you'll be OK.
That said, I'm glad he's toast.
I'm sorry to say it, but your attitude will make White more popular rather than less. From the perspective of the people he represents, White apologized for his initial remark, but that wasn't enough. He reached out to the Jewish community to be educated, but that wasn't enough. He toured the Holocaust Museum, but that wasn't enough. Now he is being asked to reject the support of a group that is in his community doing real, tangible work. You are literally demanding that hungry people turn down food because you don't like who is feeding them. How do you think that is going to go over?
White is not toast. He might be fined a small amount and he may receive a Council reprimand, but neither will have a negative impact on his electoral prospects. To the contrary, he will exploit both to increase his popularity. Washington Post criticism? Are you kidding me? He will hand out copies as campaign literature.
Why do you think Brandon Todd, Muriel Bowser's trained poodle, is asking for patience and understanding? Why do you think other Bowser supporters are out criticizing the Council Members who advocated censure? Why do you think Bowser herself has been so quiet? They know that White is far from being toast.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Post is on his ass and councilmembers are no longer coddling him. He’s done. The violation of campaign-finance law requiring constituent-service funds to be spent on DC residents is the nail in the coffin.
How long have you lived in "Dee-Cee"? The disbursement from the constituent service fund will result in a slap on the wrist at most. The more that the Post, Jewish organizations, others are 'on his ass', the more Trayon's base will see him as standing up to the Man. We've seen this playbook run in Ward 8 before.
DP. What are you saying? That if Jews stand up to an antisemite, the voters in Ward 8 dig in their heels? It sounds as if you're saying that there is so much hostility toward Jews from Ward 8 poor blacks (be honest.....that's who lives in Ward 8) that they'll WANT to keep the antisemite in office.