Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

People should ask hard questions about TC admin. Why is someone who was for many years a high-ranking central office administrator suddenly a vice principal?

Who is that?

They probably mean the one who’s married to a prominent and respected APD detective. Not naming names but a quick look at the TCW leadership team on the school website and it’ll be fairly clear.

Oh, she's a real peach. If it's possible for one person to personify an entire district's failings...

If she wasn't married to a APD bigwig she'd be working a cash register somewhere.

Why are people not naming names? Do parents have to be so connected to Alexandria politics and its small government working to know these things? Who the heck knows which ap is married to a cop? This sort of insularity is a problem with ACPS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well PP, just recently the City Manager and Staff got outed for mis-informing residents on Potomac Yard. Indeed a formal apology has been issued by Mark Jinks.

Let's hope the same happens on this west end 2nd HS matter and soon. Let's bombard the probable new mayor (Justin Wilson) for facts. The more ALL residents of Alexandria pay attention to this matter the better. Word of this must spread w documents. Use newspapers. Call for editorial investigation. Get it out of ACPS proper into the news for public comments.

I do not see what a discussion of mis interpretation of an NDA has to do with this - though I guess it shows the dangers of misintepreting documents.

As for Wilson, I have seen your comment on his FB page. He specifically said that you are misreading the spec documents.

I doubt council is going to be impressed with cranks, though we have a lot of them in our city.

Dear pp referenced here. I don't even have FaceBook.

So I guess some Alexandria resident comments similarly. Let's not make accusations. Let's work together. Even Jeff's site can stand to better ACPS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well PP, just recently the City Manager and Staff got outed for mis-informing residents on Potomac Yard. Indeed a formal apology has been issued by Mark Jinks.

Let's hope the same happens on this west end 2nd HS matter and soon. Let's bombard the probable new mayor (Justin Wilson) for facts. The more ALL residents of Alexandria pay attention to this matter the better. Word of this must spread w documents. Use newspapers. Call for editorial investigation. Get it out of ACPS proper into the news for public comments.

I do not see what a discussion of mis interpretation of an NDA has to do with this - though I guess it shows the dangers of misintepreting documents.

As for Wilson, I have seen your comment on his FB page. He specifically said that you are misreading the spec documents.

I doubt council is going to be impressed with cranks, though we have a lot of them in our city.

The Alexandria Times published a chart listing each candidate and their position on the split. It's quite accessible.

I missed that. Have a link?

It was published by the Times. See the chart, 5th line, pages 24-25: https://alextimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/05_31_2018-Alex_Times_web.pdf

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well PP, just recently the City Manager and Staff got outed for mis-informing residents on Potomac Yard. Indeed a formal apology has been issued by Mark Jinks.

Let's hope the same happens on this west end 2nd HS matter and soon. Let's bombard the probable new mayor (Justin Wilson) for facts. The more ALL residents of Alexandria pay attention to this matter the better. Word of this must spread w documents. Use newspapers. Call for editorial investigation. Get it out of ACPS proper into the news for public comments.

I do not see what a discussion of mis interpretation of an NDA has to do with this - though I guess it shows the dangers of misintepreting documents.

As for Wilson, I have seen your comment on his FB page. He specifically said that you are misreading the spec documents.

I doubt council is going to be impressed with cranks, though we have a lot of them in our city.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well PP, just recently the City Manager and Staff got outed for mis-informing residents on Potomac Yard. Indeed a formal apology has been issued by Mark Jinks.

Let's hope the same happens on this west end 2nd HS matter and soon. Let's bombard the probable new mayor (Justin Wilson) for facts. The more ALL residents of Alexandria pay attention to this matter the better. Word of this must spread w documents. Use newspapers. Call for editorial investigation. Get it out of ACPS proper into the news for public comments.

I do not see what a discussion of mis interpretation of an NDA has to do with this - though I guess it shows the dangers of misintepreting documents.

As for Wilson, I have seen your comment on his FB page. He specifically said that you are misreading the spec documents.

I doubt council is going to be impressed with cranks, though we have a lot of them in our city.

The Alexandria Times published a chart listing each candidate and their position on the split. It's quite accessible.

I missed that. Have a link?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well PP, just recently the City Manager and Staff got outed for mis-informing residents on Potomac Yard. Indeed a formal apology has been issued by Mark Jinks.

Let's hope the same happens on this west end 2nd HS matter and soon. Let's bombard the probable new mayor (Justin Wilson) for facts. The more ALL residents of Alexandria pay attention to this matter the better. Word of this must spread w documents. Use newspapers. Call for editorial investigation. Get it out of ACPS proper into the news for public comments.

I do not see what a discussion of mis interpretation of an NDA has to do with this - though I guess it shows the dangers of misintepreting documents.

As for Wilson, I have seen your comment on his FB page. He specifically said that you are misreading the spec documents.

I doubt council is going to be impressed with cranks, though we have a lot of them in our city.

The Alexandria Times published a chart listing each candidate and their position on the split. It's quite accessible.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well PP, just recently the City Manager and Staff got outed for mis-informing residents on Potomac Yard. Indeed a formal apology has been issued by Mark Jinks.

Let's hope the same happens on this west end 2nd HS matter and soon. Let's bombard the probable new mayor (Justin Wilson) for facts. The more ALL residents of Alexandria pay attention to this matter the better. Word of this must spread w documents. Use newspapers. Call for editorial investigation. Get it out of ACPS proper into the news for public comments.

I do not see what a discussion of mis interpretation of an NDA has to do with this - though I guess it shows the dangers of misintepreting documents.

As for Wilson, I have seen your comment on his FB page. He specifically said that you are misreading the spec documents.

I doubt council is going to be impressed with cranks, though we have a lot of them in our city.

Anonymous wrote:

Definitely a socio-economic status segregation. The plan is to have two or more separate high school zones. The only high school locations that school board is considering are west of the current high school. The west end will be separated into a new high school zone. The T.C. Williams building will be for east/middle students. The current building has all the extras - the planetarium, the large auditorium, the practice rooms, the multi-floor gym, the scholarship office, and everything else. It's a geographic split and the school board is picking the winners and the losers, except that eventually everybody will lose.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where are you getting your information on a proposed new zone for a second high school?

The current zones for middle schools, of which there are two for the city. The disparity between Hammond and GW is staggering.

They have an equal GS rating of 3. How is the disparity staggering?

The GS ranking is based - for every school - on reports submitted by GS participants. Those reports can be uneven and sparse and some people don’t regard them as being accurate or comprehensive. Alexandria parents seem to understand that GW is generally well-regarded but is physically falling apart (quite literally), and that FH has a prior history, only recently changed by the very good current Principal, of not being academically high-quality and being a chaotic environment. The schools have not been comparable to each other. And there is very much an SES difference between the two zones, just as there will be between the existing high school and the new west end high school.

Anonymous wrote:Well PP, just recently the City Manager and Staff got outed for mis-informing residents on Potomac Yard. Indeed a formal apology has been issued by Mark Jinks.

Let's hope the same happens on this west end 2nd HS matter and soon. Let's bombard the probable new mayor (Justin Wilson) for facts. The more ALL residents of Alexandria pay attention to this matter the better. Word of this must spread w documents. Use newspapers. Call for editorial investigation. Get it out of ACPS proper into the news for public comments.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The total budget line through the effective date of the division of TC is $124.2 million. It's already in the budget.

Total budget line for two high schools? For high school expansion in general? For all new capacity? And what "effective date"? Again, please link AND please specify the page number on which any fact you are citing to be found. Until you do, I will assume you are misunderstanding any facts you claim to cite.

Is anything being done to fight the division of the high schools in East vs. West. I've seen letters online from a teacher group at TC and from a former school board member advocating for a Minnie Howard expansion (to 9 and 10). The east/ west division of middle schools have a clear imbalance racially and socio-economically, which has been pointed out by at least one school board member publicly. In terms of distance, TC is centrally located and just as close to the West End as the East end. I assume some of this could come out in a community dialogue, which I fear would take away from the capacity discussion.

Nothing is being done to fight the TC split that is underway, in part because the school board only recently admitted that this is what they have been planning and implementing. And those recent admissions have been in the press and not in official statements other than the educational specification regulations - those are formal, publicly released, and binding. The school board’s intention is to have all final approvals in place so that the split is irreversible before conducting any formal public proceedings to bless their already-made decision.

can you cite to articles, would like to read more about it.

There is no split underway. For some reason one person (maybe two?) seem obsessed with the idea that there is. The only evidence is a stretched reading of a few lines in a technical specs doc for new high school capacity. Dem Mayor nominee Wilson has said to one such individual (on FB) that they are reading the docs incorrectly. While they have not yet determined where or how they will add capacity, I think maintaining a city wide school is the most likely outcome by far.

The split is actively underway. It's four technical documents, the city has budgeted it, and now the school board has set it for implementation. It's final. The most recent one of the documents, which discusses the exact nature of the planning (a split is the only option under consideration) was posted at: http://esbpublic.acps.k12.va.us/attachments/8b8b93f8-e13d-4d68-aa19-b48ccf65efe7.pdf and the staff presentation (which has the correct date) is at: http://esbpublic.acps.k12.va.us/attachments/ac6ed749-8dc5-4cc8-9f62-36ba861900a2.pdf

School board contractors conducted a survey of exactly 16 TC Williams faculty, and 9 opposed. They conducted the survey in November 2017, but the results were so contrary to what school board wanted that they buried it in the May 20, 2018 meeting. See the last two pages in particular: http://esbpublic.acps.k12.va.us/attachments/2e1aac3c-2b25-4ef6-9dd0-d5d3d219dc70.pdf - the report has more pages than survey participants. The consultants that the school board hired were directed to recommend against any structure except for multiple high schools, and they complied. See their summary, posted at: http://esbpublic.acps.k12.va.us/attachments/30039e67-5330-432a-a853-e4b9aa706375.pdf

School board has never once entertained any proposal but for the creation of the new, lower-tier 9-12 high school. There is not a single document that the school board has adopted that tees that option up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where are you getting your information on a proposed new zone for a second high school?

The current zones for middle schools, of which there are two for the city. The disparity between Hammond and GW is staggering.

They have an equal GS rating of 3. How is the disparity staggering?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where are you getting your information on a proposed new zone for a second high school?

The current zones for middle schools, of which there are two for the city. The disparity between Hammond and GW is staggering.

Anonymous wrote:Where are you getting your information on a proposed new zone for a second high school?