Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My dad is exactly like this. Always fit and trim, even now that he’s in his late 60s. All his girlfriends before my mom, and my mom as well, have been the equivalent of a size 8-10. I’m pretty thin and petite (size 0 - 2) and he’s always said I was too skinny and looked like a little boy. ?

Your dad sounds like an asshole

Well 0-2 is pretty much anorexic with zero chest unless she got implants....so he's right.

You poor fatty has an unfortunate warped sense of reality.

Anyone smaller than you are too skinny. Size 0-2 cloyhes in today's stores are 4-6 in the past.

TIL my 5'2" 118lb wife is anorexic.

Anything it takes to make the fattys feel good.

First of all, even people who weight 200lbs can be anorexic. Your wife at that height and weight is not at all skinny, morel like, ehh, she could lose a few and then some to look skinny. I am around her weight and taller, and not skinny like I used to be. Plus people need to spot using anorexic as a physical description. There is no set weight for anorexic people, they can be any bloody weight and even morbidly obese.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm 5'10", 175, with great T&A, and I get constant male attention.

Of course you do. It's attention for sex not companionship and love. How obvious is that?

-Man

The question is whether I'm attractive. Apparently I am.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curvy does not mean overweight or obese. It refers to a woman with a certain type of body proportions- the waist is smaller than the bust and hips by 8 inches or more. So a thin woman can be curvy if her body has these proportions.

For example, Marilyn Monroe (35" bust/22" waist/35" hips) was a curvy woman because her waist was 13" smaller than her bust and hips. She was 5'5" and 120 lbs so not overweight or obese. She was statistically average for a woman of her height and build. She was only a size 12 by 1950 standards. By modern standards, she would be a size 4, maybe 6 at most.

5'5" and 120lbs is just about perfect.

+1.

Now, same height and 160lbs is just fat.

Really, because I’m a size 10 at 5’5 160 and wouldn’t consider myself “fat.” Chubby, absolutely, but I don’t have rolls, cankles, whatever else.

You are delusional. But, not just you, whole country is delusional. I am 5'4" and not over 120 and trying to lose weight. And, yes, I am female, all muscle, I work out. Chubby is just another word for fat.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the CDC (which sounds about right):

You're completely delusional (CDC template or not) if you think any man is looking for a 170 pound woman.

Look at the height. It is possible that an athletic woman at that height could be a size 6 or 8 and look completely healthy.

No. Try and tweak the variables untill your heart is content but 170lbs isn't feminine. It's masculine. Straight men want women, not men.

Ha! I'm 5'8 and for a while weighed 170, around the time I was doing a lot of Olympic lifting and rowing twice a day. I've never gotten hit on by so many guys, of so many difference ethnicities. Pretty sure they were straight.

That is more than what DH weighed when he rowed crew in college and he is 5'10". Most of his male crewmates weighed under 170 and this was for lightweight male crew team.

Duh-they had to weigh under 170, they were lightweights. The heavyweights were much bigger, and I would never be a lightweight (female) rower. Is it hat hard to believe women can be strong and attractive and not tiny?

And who wants to be with a man that Classifies himself as lightweight?? UHHH...

So why are you posting here? To each their own. It makes me wonder you can't attract any women, no matter the look or size. Or are you deluded to think heavier women are so indiscriminate that you are a catch to them? Either way, you post sounds weird and gives off loser vibe.

Anonymous wrote:I'm 5'10", 175, with great T&A, and I get constant male attention.

Of course you do. It's attention for sex not companionship and love. How obvious is that?

-Man

I'm 5'10", 175, with great T&A, and I get constant male attention.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My dad is exactly like this. Always fit and trim, even now that he’s in his late 60s. All his girlfriends before my mom, and my mom as well, have been the equivalent of a size 8-10. I’m pretty thin and petite (size 0 - 2) and he’s always said I was too skinny and looked like a little boy. ?

Your dad sounds like an asshole

Well 0-2 is pretty much anorexic with zero chest unless she got implants....so he's right.

You poor fatty has an unfortunate warped sense of reality.

Anyone smaller than you are too skinny. Size 0-2 cloyhes in today's stores are 4-6 in the past.

TIL my 5'2" 118lb wife is anorexic.

Anything it takes to make the fattys feel good.

women who fit size 0-2 ALSO fit into LITTLE GIRLS clothes...chest size of 32 in = elementary school girls..NO THANKS, NOT sexy

No.. women size 0-2 are cut differently than little girl size. I'm very petite. I can "fit" into a youth size 14/16 as long as the cut is wide around the chest. If it's a "slim" or tight fitting shirt, the shirt would be extremely tight around the chest, even though I'm an A cup. Same for pants.. women, even size 0/2, have hips and a defined waist. Children do not. The waist/hip is pretty straight. Not so for women 0/2. I can however fit into Miss or Jr size better,, but Miss/Jr size is cut for a defined waist/hip. The sizing for Jr is smaller than for Mrs or Women. Even though I'm petite, I have to wear a larger jr size.

Anonymous wrote:Curvy does not mean overweight or obese. It refers to a woman with a certain type of body proportions- the waist is smaller than the bust and hips by 8 inches or more. So a thin woman can be curvy if her body has these proportions.

For example, Marilyn Monroe (35" bust/22" waist/35" hips) was a curvy woman because her waist was 13" smaller than her bust and hips. She was 5'5" and 120 lbs so not overweight or obese. She was statistically average for a woman of her height and build. She was only a size 12 by 1950 standards. By modern standards, she would be a size 4, maybe 6 at most.

There's no way she weighed only 120. Unless she was actually much shorter.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the CDC (which sounds about right):

You're completely delusional (CDC template or not) if you think any man is looking for a 170 pound woman.

Look at the height. It is possible that an athletic woman at that height could be a size 6 or 8 and look completely healthy.

No. Try and tweak the variables untill your heart is content but 170lbs isn't feminine. It's masculine. Straight men want women, not men.

+1

If you think straight men don't prefer curves (NOT FAT) in bed you're nuts. These scrawny workout obsessed 40 somethings are NOT hot.
- a guy

Don’t know many scrawny workout obsessed 40 somethings but there are a lot more 170+ pound women who never workout who insist how attractive and curvy and hot they are on DCUM.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the CDC (which sounds about right):

You're completely delusional (CDC template or not) if you think any man is looking for a 170 pound woman.

Look at the height. It is possible that an athletic woman at that height could be a size 6 or 8 and look completely healthy.

No. Try and tweak the variables untill your heart is content but 170lbs isn't feminine. It's masculine. Straight men want women, not men.

+1

If you think straight men don't prefer curves (NOT FAT) in bed you're nuts. These scrawny workout obsessed 40 somethings are NOT hot.
- a guy

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the CDC (which sounds about right):

You're completely delusional (CDC template or not) if you think any man is looking for a 170 pound woman.

Look at the height. It is possible that an athletic woman at that height could be a size 6 or 8 and look completely healthy.

No. Try and tweak the variables untill your heart is content but 170lbs isn't feminine. It's masculine. Straight men want women, not men.

Ha! I'm 5'8 and for a while weighed 170, around the time I was doing a lot of Olympic lifting and rowing twice a day. I've never gotten hit on by so many guys, of so many difference ethnicities. Pretty sure they were straight.

That is more than what DH weighed when he rowed crew in college and he is 5'10". Most of his male crewmates weighed under 170 and this was for lightweight male crew team.

Duh-they had to weigh under 170, they were lightweights. The heavyweights were much bigger, and I would never be a lightweight (female) rower. Is it hat hard to believe women can be strong and attractive and not tiny?

Is it hard to believe that no one is buying your '170lbs as a woman is attractive " schick? Sorry. No man here is interested in a Russian gymnast. You drew a short stick in looks. It happens. Stop trying to tell everyone else theyre wrong. Geez. Talk about tiresome.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the CDC (which sounds about right):

You're completely delusional (CDC template or not) if you think any man is looking for a 170 pound woman.

Look at the height. It is possible that an athletic woman at that height could be a size 6 or 8 and look completely healthy.

No. Try and tweak the variables untill your heart is content but 170lbs isn't feminine. It's masculine. Straight men want women, not men.

Ha! I'm 5'8 and for a while weighed 170, around the time I was doing a lot of Olympic lifting and rowing twice a day. I've never gotten hit on by so many guys, of so many difference ethnicities. Pretty sure they were straight.

That is more than what DH weighed when he rowed crew in college and he is 5'10". Most of his male crewmates weighed under 170 and this was for lightweight male crew team.

Duh-they had to weigh under 170, they were lightweights. The heavyweights were much bigger, and I would never be a lightweight (female) rower. Is it hat hard to believe women can be strong and attractive and not tiny?

LOL exactly. So proud of your 'lightweight' husband, PP. News for you honey - big, strong guys are attractive.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the CDC (which sounds about right):

You're completely delusional (CDC template or not) if you think any man is looking for a 170 pound woman.

Look at the height. It is possible that an athletic woman at that height could be a size 6 or 8 and look completely healthy.

No. Try and tweak the variables untill your heart is content but 170lbs isn't feminine. It's masculine. Straight men want women, not men.

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to the CDC (which sounds about right):

You're completely delusional (CDC template or not) if you think any man is looking for a 170 pound woman.

Look at the height. It is possible that an athletic woman at that height could be a size 6 or 8 and look completely healthy.

No. Try and tweak the variables untill your heart is content but 170lbs isn't feminine. It's masculine. Straight men want women, not men.

Ha! I'm 5'8 and for a while weighed 170, around the time I was doing a lot of Olympic lifting and rowing twice a day. I've never gotten hit on by so many guys, of so many difference ethnicities. Pretty sure they were straight.

That is more than what DH weighed when he rowed crew in college and he is 5'10". Most of his male crewmates weighed under 170 and this was for lightweight male crew team.

Duh-they had to weigh under 170, they were lightweights. The heavyweights were much bigger, and I would never be a lightweight (female) rower. Is it hat hard to believe women can be strong and attractive and not tiny?