Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parents hated the boy and didn't want their daughter anywhere near him. How did he get inside that house to begin with?

Based on the info provided, it looks like the parents didn't know who the boy, and used spying to try and figure it out (which is not reliable). It may have helped to have a personal relationship with the boy their daughter is dating, vs. making assumptions and acting on them. And were you never a teenager? Kids sneak in and out their windows all the time to do what they want!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's making national news, but what will come of this? Will people suddenly be more interested in gun control? Will we do more to combat hate groups? I am starting to feel like chicken little every time I read local, national and international news.

I'll be satisfied when we start talking about the radicalization of young Christian men with the same urgency that we look at radicalization of young Muslim men.

What on earth makes you think he is Christian? He doesn’t sound Christian at all.

Process of elimination. Not a lot of Jewish or Muslim white supremacists.

CONGRATS - YOU WIN THE PRIZE FOR MOST IGNORANT COMMENT OF THE YEAR!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's making national news, but what will come of this? Will people suddenly be more interested in gun control? Will we do more to combat hate groups? I am starting to feel like chicken little every time I read local, national and international news.

I'll be satisfied when we start talking about the radicalization of young Christian men with the same urgency that we look at radicalization of young Muslim men.

What on earth makes you think he is Christian? He doesn’t sound Christian at all.

Process of elimination. Not a lot of Jewish or Muslim white supremacists.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's making national news, but what will come of this? Will people suddenly be more interested in gun control? Will we do more to combat hate groups? I am starting to feel like chicken little every time I read local, national and international news.

I'll be satisfied when we start talking about the radicalization of young Christian men with the same urgency that we look at radicalization of young Muslim men.

What on earth makes you think he is Christian? He doesn’t sound Christian at all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's making national news, but what will come of this? Will people suddenly be more interested in gun control? Will we do more to combat hate groups? I am starting to feel like chicken little every time I read local, national and international news.

I'll be satisfied when we start talking about the radicalization of young Christian men with the same urgency that we look at radicalization of young Muslim men.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I assume the boy got the gun from his parent's (without their permission) and didn't purchase? If so, are the parents liable at all? Do we know they even got it legally?

Why no statement from the parents. Isn't there usually something from the parents like "This isn't the child we knew. Our hears break for the victims and we are devastated." Nada.

You would think, right? Except the NRA has gone balls to the wall to make sure no one is ever held liable for gun violence ever, under any circumstances, no matter how careless.

And this is why nothing will ever get better wrt guns. This and calling all the toddlers who get a hold of guns and killing themselves or others "tragic accidents". Gtfo with that nonsense - that is a negligent gun owner and that should be treated as a criminal act. I don't care if It seems mean to charge people who lost a child-it's their damn fault and maybe people would start being more careful with loaded weapons.

+1 I will GUARANTEE that this kid's parents thought they were responsible gun owners, because everyone claims to be a responsible gun owner until the day their kid commits suicide, or murders another child, or just accidentally shoots their sibling.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I assume the boy got the gun from his parent's (without their permission) and didn't purchase? If so, are the parents liable at all? Do we know they even got it legally?

Why no statement from the parents. Isn't there usually something from the parents like "This isn't the child we knew. Our hears break for the victims and we are devastated." Nada.

You would think, right? Except the NRA has gone balls to the wall to make sure no one is ever held liable for gun violence ever, under any circumstances, no matter how careless.

And this is why nothing will ever get better wrt guns. This and calling all the toddlers who get a hold of guns and killing themselves or others "tragic accidents". Gtfo with that nonsense - that is a negligent gun owner and that should be treated as a criminal act. I don't care if It seems mean to charge people who lost a child-it's their damn fault and maybe people would start being more careful with loaded weapons.

+1 I will GUARANTEE that this kid's parents thought they were responsible gun owners, because everyone claims to be a responsible gun owner until the day their kid commits suicide, or murders another child, or just accidentally shoots their sibling.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I assume the boy got the gun from his parent's (without their permission) and didn't purchase? If so, are the parents liable at all? Do we know they even got it legally?

Why no statement from the parents. Isn't there usually something from the parents like "This isn't the child we knew. Our hears break for the victims and we are devastated." Nada.

You would think, right? Except the NRA has gone balls to the wall to make sure no one is ever held liable for gun violence ever, under any circumstances, no matter how careless.

And this is why nothing will ever get better wrt guns. This and calling all the toddlers who get a hold of guns and killing themselves or others "tragic accidents". Gtfo with that nonsense - that is a negligent gun owner and that should be treated as a criminal act. I don't care if It seems mean to charge people who lost a child-it's their damn fault and maybe people would start being more careful with loaded weapons.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I assume the boy got the gun from his parent's (without their permission) and didn't purchase? If so, are the parents liable at all? Do we know they even got it legally?

Why no statement from the parents. Isn't there usually something from the parents like "This isn't the child we knew. Our hears break for the victims and we are devastated." Nada.

You would think, right? Except the NRA has gone balls to the wall to make sure no one is ever held liable for gun violence ever, under any circumstances, no matter how careless.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope the poor little boy gets his dog back. The rest of his family is gone.

i know I hope so too. He needs the love of that dog right now and the dog must be so frightened right now too.

I can't stop thinking about the poor little boy. A week ago he was excited about the upcoming Christmas day, and all his family gathering together to spend the holiday. Last night he went to sleep with his world shattered, heart devastated. I am absolutely sick about this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I assume the boy got the gun from his parent's (without their permission) and didn't purchase? If so, are the parents liable at all? Do we know they even got it legally?

Why no statement from the parents. Isn't there usually something from the parents like "This isn't the child we knew. Our hears break for the victims and we are devastated." Nada.

You would think, right? Except the NRA has gone balls to the wall to make sure no one is ever held liable for gun violence ever, under any circumstances, no matter how careless.

Anonymous wrote:What happened to the dog?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I assume the boy got the gun from his parent's (without their permission) and didn't purchase? If so, are the parents liable at all? Do we know they even got it legally?

Why no statement from the parents. Isn't there usually something from the parents like "This isn't the child we knew. Our hears break for the victims and we are devastated." Nada.

Hopefully—for them—they have a very competent attorney who has told them to STFU.