Anonymous wrote:Being rich in a flyover metro is no different than being rich in a coastal city once you're married (with kids). Men work, go to kid's private school functions, drink good scotch alone in the basement while watching cable news at night. SAHMs do yoga, shop at Whole Foods, post on facebook. Your circle of friends is other execs, business owners, lawyers, doctors, professors. If you're jones'ing for the one Kennedy Center event you go to a year, fly to it. Flyover is only a risk for middle class who don't have the deep labor market bounce around.
Anonymous wrote:Lol at people and railing on flyover conntry. I grew up in Colorado and it’s much better than here in every way - including better looking, in shape and down to earth women.
DC harpies are the worst. Can’t wait to move back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Before age 30... and never studied... hmm...
Typical inland lakefront mansion in the Midwest
![]()
High end luxury SUV
Yes please. I'd send our kids to the finest day school, I'd become a yoga pro, and volunteer the rest of the day in the nearest low-income school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Person I never in a million years would be envious of:
Woman who left NYC at 27 to marry into a midwest car dealer family and live in a giant lake house and drive a new SUV.
+ high community status
+ best private schools
+ travel anywhere
+ in-laws' winter home in Naples, FL
+ in-laws' ski house in Vail, CO
Not a bad come up for a cute ditz who studied communications at a crummy college.
lol. bless your heart. I think you actually just can't conceive of a world where tenure at an R1 is more prestogious and desired than vacations at your in laws in Florida.
Anonymous wrote:Lol wow. This thread is cracking me up.
I am not the PP, but I'll share my attitude about this.
I always wanted to truly respect and love my husband. I personally could never be happy in any situation - no matter how luxurious - where that was not true. So, to me, if your niece loves and respects her husband and he treats her well, then sure I'd take that life. If she doesn't, no thanks. Call me an idealist!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My husband married a girl with a trust fund that he met in college. It’s worked out nicely, he gets to have a SAHW and kids with every security imaginable in the form of trusts, and because I’m very private about it IRL everyone assumes he’s made all of our money. He’s a high earner but not high enough to provide absolute security for a lifetime like my money does.
Similar situation here, except I've worked in a career I love since my 20s, and he has pursued his passion. We live modestly but want for nothing.Our children don't realize the extent of our assets. We want them to learn the value of working hard for goals, and to appreciate helping others for how good it feels. Our assets will go mostly to charity when we die.
Anonymous wrote:Before age 30... and never studied... hmm...
Typical inland lakefront mansion in the Midwest
![]()
High end luxury SUV
Anonymous wrote:My husband married a girl with a trust fund that he met in college. It’s worked out nicely, he gets to have a SAHW and kids with every security imaginable in the form of trusts, and because I’m very private about it IRL everyone assumes he’s made all of our money. He’s a high earner but not high enough to provide absolute security for a lifetime like my money does.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
lol. bless your heart. I think you actually just can't conceive of a world where tenure at an R1 is more prestogious and desired than vacations at your in laws in Florida.
NP. It might be more prestigious, but the money frankly is just not very good, and that fact sucks more than I thought it would. Prestige doesn't buy me a vacation in the Maldives.
-wife of tenture-track faculy member
Nobody gets tenure for the money obviously. And we're talking about the professors, not the spouses-of. And all of the R1/Ivy professors I know are constantly traveling to very cool places. I can believe of course that there are tradeoffs and drawbacks, but the topic here is whether being a 27 year old nonworking woman in the midwest married to a car dealer heir is the pinnacle of female dreams.
I thought we were talking about the spouses. This 27 year old is a spouse of a car dealer heir, no?
My point is that i used to place a higher premium on prestige. Now I would prefer a little more cash. Just being honest.
DP, and that may be the case. Personally, I wouldn't like to be married to a tenured professor either. But you are responding to a person who was talking about wanting tenure for themselves, not their spouse. That person was saying that for them it would be more prestigious than being married to someone rich.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Being rich in a flyover metro is no different than being rich in a coastal city once you're married (with kids). Men work, go to kid's private school functions, drink good scotch alone in the basement while watching cable news at night. SAHMs do yoga, shop at Whole Foods, post on facebook. Your circle of friends is other execs, business owners, lawyers, doctors, professors. If you're jones'ing for the one Kennedy Center event you go to a year, fly to it. Flyover is only a risk for middle class who don't have the deep labor market bounce around.
This isn't true. I'm from a wealthy area in a flyover metro and it's VERY different than living in DC with a two career household.
Can you elaborate PP? I am considering a relocation with my family and would love to hear your take. Will I die of boredom?
Not pp but I’m from Chicago and never been bored. The nightlife is extensive, we have good outdoor spaces to run and bike, and many of the moms are yoga finatics that shop at Whole Foods. I can see moving to a rural area can be boring if you’re a city person, but living in Chicago or in the heart of cities like Minneapolis, Indianapolis, Colombus, OH, etc., will not leave you bored.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Being rich in a flyover metro is no different than being rich in a coastal city once you're married (with kids). Men work, go to kid's private school functions, drink good scotch alone in the basement while watching cable news at night. SAHMs do yoga, shop at Whole Foods, post on facebook. Your circle of friends is other execs, business owners, lawyers, doctors, professors. If you're jones'ing for the one Kennedy Center event you go to a year, fly to it. Flyover is only a risk for middle class who don't have the deep labor market bounce around.
This isn't true. I'm from a wealthy area in a flyover metro and it's VERY different than living in DC with a two career household.
Can you elaborate PP? I am considering a relocation with my family and would love to hear your take. Will I die of boredom?
Not pp but I’m from Chicago and never been bored. The nightlife is extensive, we have good outdoor spaces to run and bike, and many of the moms are yoga finatics that shop at Whole Foods. I can see moving to a rural area can be boring if you’re a city person, but living in Chicago or in the heart of cities like Minneapolis, Indianapolis, Colombus, OH, etc., will not leave you bored.
I would be very happy living in Indianapolis. I spent a year living in South Bend and I actually became depressed it was so horrible.
Flyover country single and broke != flyover country with a family and millions
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Person I never in a million years would be envious of:
Woman who left NYC at 27 to marry into a midwest car dealer family and live in a giant lake house and drive a new SUV.
+ high community status
+ best private schools
+ travel anywhere
+ in-laws' winter home in Naples, FL
+ in-laws' ski house in Vail, CO
Not a bad come up for a cute ditz who studied communications at a crummy college.
lol. bless your heart. I think you actually just can't conceive of a world where tenure at an R1 is more prestogious and desired than vacations at your in laws in Florida.
NP. It might be more prestigious, but the money frankly is just not very good, and that fact sucks more than I thought it would. Prestige doesn't buy me a vacation in the Maldives.
-wife of tenture-track faculy member
Nobody gets tenure for the money obviously. And we're talking about the professors, not the spouses-of. And all of the R1/Ivy professors I know are constantly traveling to very cool places. I can believe of course that there are tradeoffs and drawbacks, but the topic here is whether being a 27 year old nonworking woman in the midwest married to a car dealer heir is the pinnacle of female dreams.
I thought we were talking about the spouses. This 27 year old is a spouse of a car dealer heir, no?
My point is that i used to place a higher premium on prestige. Now I would prefer a little more cash. Just being honest.