Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stanford ED....rejected.
Will be a very unMerry Xmas
Are you devastated when you buy a $1 lotto ticket and don’t win $1000? I mean come on, it’s Stanford. Nobody has a real crisp shot unless they’re the incoming quarterback or a top 50 junior tennis player.
Well, the odds for a $1 lotto ticket to win is about 1/100,000 to and the odds for getting in Stanford are about 1/20. Completely different expectations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stanford is out already, as are some elite SLAC colleges. So far, so good at our "Big 3" NW DC private. Fingers crossed, and good luck to all.
And so the Sidwell admissions bragging thread has begun. How do I know? The over-emphasizing of Stanford specifically, and under-emphasis on - by not specifically naming them - the more general "elite SLAC colleges." For Sidwell families, if it isn't HPSY, then it is not important enough to detail. Your student was probably admitted to Stanford.
Thank you for the understated posted gloating in its enthusiasm ("So far, so good") that all of your "Big 3 NW DC private" school's EA applicants to "Stanford" and "some elite SLAC colleges" were admitted (again, the "So far, so good"). It is really a bit insensitive coming on the heels of so many other previous posts expressing students' disappointment at not being admitted to those or other schools.
Insufferable really. Which Big 3 school is already bragging?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stanford is out already, as are some elite SLAC colleges. So far, so good at our "Big 3" NW DC private. Fingers crossed, and good luck to all.
And so the Sidwell admissions bragging thread has begun. How do I know? The over-emphasizing of Stanford specifically, and under-emphasis on - by not specifically naming them - the more general "elite SLAC colleges." For Sidwell families, if it isn't HPSY, then it is not important enough to detail. Your student was probably admitted to Stanford.
Thank you for the understated posted gloating in its enthusiasm ("So far, so good") that all of your "Big 3 NW DC private" school's EA applicants to "Stanford" and "some elite SLAC colleges" were admitted (again, the "So far, so good"). It is really a bit insensitive coming on the heels of so many other previous posts expressing students' disappointment at not being admitted to those or other schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stanford is out already, as are some elite SLAC colleges. So far, so good at our "Big 3" NW DC private. Fingers crossed, and good luck to all.
And so the Sidwell admissions bragging thread has begun. How do I know? The over-emphasizing of Stanford specifically, and under-emphasis on - by not specifically naming them - the more general "elite SLAC colleges." For Sidwell families, if it isn't HPSY, then it is not important enough to detail. Your student was probably admitted to Stanford.
Thank you for the understated posted gloating in its enthusiasm ("So far, so good") that all of your "Big 3 NW DC private" school's EA applicants to "Stanford" and "some elite SLAC colleges" were admitted (again, the "So far, so good"). It is really a bit insensitive coming on the heels of so many other previous posts expressing students' disappointment at not being admitted to those or other schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stanford is out already, as are some elite SLAC colleges. So far, so good at our "Big 3" NW DC private. Fingers crossed, and good luck to all.
And so the Sidwell admissions bragging thread has begun. How do I know? The over-emphasizing of Stanford specifically, and under-emphasis on - by not specifically naming them - the more general "elite SLAC colleges." For Sidwell families, if it isn't HPSY, then it is not important enough to detail. Your student was probably admitted to Stanford.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm reading this thread and wondering... which is it?
The posters are seniors in high school, or
Y'all are way too involved. I have a senior. He was accepted places you folks might distain. I do not know about any other kid's outcomes.
Not sure what your point is. If your child is not applying to super-competitive schools and is qualified for the schools on his list, of course the process will be much less dramatic. People are less likely to post in cases where the outcomes are assured. If you don't know about other kids' outcomes, presumably that's because you are incurious and/or don't have friends who like to talk about this subject. Not sure why any of that would make you want to judge others.
So your saying that if my son were applying to Harvard I would somehow develop an insane interest in all the other kids at his school who are applying to such places? Not likely.
The few parents who have pushed conversations about where my kid was applying were fishing. It was awkward and distasteful. Do you stay this involved Freshman year, too?
Anonymous wrote:Stanford is out already, as are some elite SLAC colleges. So far, so good at our "Big 3" NW DC private. Fingers crossed, and good luck to all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stanford ED....rejected.
Will be a very unMerry Xmas
Are you devastated when you buy a $1 lotto ticket and don’t win $1000? I mean come on, it’s Stanford. Nobody has a real crisp shot unless they’re the incoming quarterback or a top 50 junior tennis player.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Northeastern practically invented the protect the yeild to move up in the rankings game.
Then it was a bad invention. Yield is only 1.5% of the USN rankings formula.
Alls I know is that the school is rocketing through the ranks.
Doesn't have to stay that way. Google is your friend. Had little to do with yield.
http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/2014/08/26/how-northeastern-gamed-the-college-rankings/2/
Anonymous wrote:God son admitted Tulane ED. Great kid. Not an academic, so this was his stretch. So happy and proud it worked out!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm reading this thread and wondering... which is it?
The posters are seniors in high school, or
Y'all are way too involved. I have a senior. He was accepted places you folks might distain. I do not know about any other kid's outcomes.
Not sure what your point is. If your child is not applying to super-competitive schools and is qualified for the schools on his list, of course the process will be much less dramatic. People are less likely to post in cases where the outcomes are assured. If you don't know about other kids' outcomes, presumably that's because you are incurious and/or don't have friends who like to talk about this subject. Not sure why any of that would make you want to judge others.