Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not OK to be white?

Damn!

I don't know anyone who actually has stated this.

OP did.

I’m getting really tired of seeing race mentioned on every single forum in DCUM, from real estate to cooking tips. Starting to seriously wonder about Russian propaganda here.

Anonymous wrote:It’s not OK to be white?

Damn!

I don't know anyone who actually has stated this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Why don't you read up on the history of American race relations and look at who is in power - in the government, in corporations, at the upper rungs of univeresities, in cultural production - and tell us why? Or will you melt once you realize the extent of what Americans of non-European ancestry have had to put up with over the centuries?

Jewish people? They are overwhelming represented in Forbes 400, Forbes 500 corporations, media and upper echelons of government. They're the most successful demographic in the country rivaled only by the original WASPs, the Episcopalians, due to high intelligence, culture that values success and clannish behavior (WASPs used to do this). Interestingly, you see similar results with overseas Chinese in other Asian countries.

As for your second question, until fairly recent times, White people made up the overwhelming number of immigrants to this country (until 1965) and were about 90% of the population until the 1980's. Of course culture, media, government, etc is going to reflect who the majority of people are in the nation in most circumstances.

DP.. that's the point, so why are some white people still complaining since this is still the case.

Also, most people can't tell that someone is a Jew simply by looking at them. I would've never have thought that Kushner is a Jew if I just saw him on the street.

R u kidding? Kushner looks very jewish. Shape of his eye brows and mouth and nose.

Yikes. Most bigoted thing I’ve read on DCUM, with strong competition.

You’re anonymous here, but don’t think you’re successfully hiding in real life interactions. It always comes out.

I’m not even Jewish, and I think Kushner’s a traitor. But yikes.

It’s not OK to be white?

Damn!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

this is a prank intended to stoke racial tension.

It's not even a prank. It's a recruiting tool for white supremacists. They are pretty open about their intended goal - getting mainstream whites to see themselves as victims and becoming to white supremacist policies and politicians.

How is this a form of recruitment?

It's not as though there's a number to call.

This is some yokel acting like a victimized fool.

DP.

It’s the first step in the process of radicalization. Point out how the culture you’re living in rejects you for being something you can’t change. Help them feel pride in who they are... then help them feel angry about the rejection...then help them make the decision to do something about it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Why don't you read up on the history of American race relations and look at who is in power - in the government, in corporations, at the upper rungs of univeresities, in cultural production - and tell us why? Or will you melt once you realize the extent of what Americans of non-European ancestry have had to put up with over the centuries?

Jewish people? They are overwhelming represented in Forbes 400, Forbes 500 corporations, media and upper echelons of government. They're the most successful demographic in the country rivaled only by the original WASPs, the Episcopalians, due to high intelligence, culture that values success and clannish behavior (WASPs used to do this). Interestingly, you see similar results with overseas Chinese in other Asian countries.

As for your second question, until fairly recent times, White people made up the overwhelming number of immigrants to this country (until 1965) and were about 90% of the population until the 1980's. Of course culture, media, government, etc is going to reflect who the majority of people are in the nation in most circumstances.

DP.. that's the point, so why are some white people still complaining since this is still the case.

Also, most people can't tell that someone is a Jew simply by looking at them. I would've never have thought that Kushner is a Jew if I just saw him on the street.

I personally grew up in a very Jewish location outside NYC (my private school was half jewish, we had a rabbinical college in our town etc). I can tell if someone is Jewish often by mannerisms as well as looks unless their family has heavily outmarried (which most jews are doing today), but most people don't have this experience.

The current US population is about 61% non-hispanic white. That is a HUGE demographic change in just 30 years of nearly 30%!

https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045216

It is understandable why some people might be uncomfortable with rapid change when the playground doesn't look like it did when you were a kid and worry about your own culture being supplanted by someone else.

I stated on this forum that some white people are scared about the fact that they will become minorities and was told by some poster that it was liberal BS that the media was pushing. Even so, most minorities do not think white people should be ashamed to be white or celebrate their heritage as long as it's not hateful. Are there those who do feel this way? Sure, as there are white people who are hateful and racist and think if you are black then you are inferior. Opposite sides of the same coin.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Why don't you read up on the history of American race relations and look at who is in power - in the government, in corporations, at the upper rungs of univeresities, in cultural production - and tell us why? Or will you melt once you realize the extent of what Americans of non-European ancestry have had to put up with over the centuries?

Jewish people? They are overwhelming represented in Forbes 400, Forbes 500 corporations, media and upper echelons of government. They're the most successful demographic in the country rivaled only by the original WASPs, the Episcopalians, due to high intelligence, culture that values success and clannish behavior (WASPs used to do this). Interestingly, you see similar results with overseas Chinese in other Asian countries.

As for your second question, until fairly recent times, White people made up the overwhelming number of immigrants to this country (until 1965) and were about 90% of the population until the 1980's. Of course culture, media, government, etc is going to reflect who the majority of people are in the nation in most circumstances.

DP.. that's the point, so why are some white people still complaining since this is still the case.

Also, most people can't tell that someone is a Jew simply by looking at them. I would've never have thought that Kushner is a Jew if I just saw him on the street.

I personally grew up in a very Jewish location outside NYC (my private school was half jewish, we had a rabbinical college in our town etc). I can tell if someone is Jewish often by mannerisms as well as looks unless their family has heavily outmarried (which most jews are doing today), but most people don't have this experience.

The current US population is about 61% non-hispanic white. That is a HUGE demographic change in just 30 years of nearly 30%!

https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045216

It is understandable why some people might be uncomfortable with rapid change when the playground doesn't look like it did when you were a kid and worry about your own culture being supplanted by someone else.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Why don't you read up on the history of American race relations and look at who is in power - in the government, in corporations, at the upper rungs of univeresities, in cultural production - and tell us why? Or will you melt once you realize the extent of what Americans of non-European ancestry have had to put up with over the centuries?

Jewish people? They are overwhelming represented in Forbes 400, Forbes 500 corporations, media and upper echelons of government. They're the most successful demographic in the country rivaled only by the original WASPs, the Episcopalians, due to high intelligence, culture that values success and clannish behavior (WASPs used to do this). Interestingly, you see similar results with overseas Chinese in other Asian countries.

As for your second question, until fairly recent times, White people made up the overwhelming number of immigrants to this country (until 1965) and were about 90% of the population until the 1980's. Of course culture, media, government, etc is going to reflect who the majority of people are in the nation in most circumstances.

DP.. that's the point, so why are some white people still complaining since this is still the case.

Also, most people can't tell that someone is a Jew simply by looking at them. I would've never have thought that Kushner is a Jew if I just saw him on the street.

R u kidding? Kushner looks very jewish. Shape of his eye brows and mouth and nose.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Why don't you read up on the history of American race relations and look at who is in power - in the government, in corporations, at the upper rungs of univeresities, in cultural production - and tell us why? Or will you melt once you realize the extent of what Americans of non-European ancestry have had to put up with over the centuries?

Jewish people? They are overwhelming represented in Forbes 400, Forbes 500 corporations, media and upper echelons of government. They're the most successful demographic in the country rivaled only by the original WASPs, the Episcopalians, due to high intelligence, culture that values success and clannish behavior (WASPs used to do this). Interestingly, you see similar results with overseas Chinese in other Asian countries.

As for your second question, until fairly recent times, White people made up the overwhelming number of immigrants to this country (until 1965) and were about 90% of the population until the 1980's. Of course culture, media, government, etc is going to reflect who the majority of people are in the nation in most circumstances.

DP.. that's the point, so why are some white people still complaining since this is still the case.

Also, most people can't tell that someone is a Jew simply by looking at them. I would've never have thought that Kushner is a Jew if I just saw him on the street.

Anonymous wrote:

Which empires were multi-ethnic?

I'm only somewhat interested in the answer because the real issue for those trying so hard to make this about race is that multiculturalism has already happened. The power dynamic in the world order has already shifted.

You can tell who didn't get the memo because they're still talking about history and empires. Everyone one else sees this as something beyond American and is moving on. MAGA is a huge bust.

White guys hoping to hang on to white power would do better to look at the emerging cultural and political threat coming from women. That's a group realizing their strength across race, SES, nationalities and even gender.

You may not notice it if you're a tiki-torcher. Which is fine.

As to your first question all of them actually, its required be definition in order to be an empire!

"An empire is defined as "an aggregate of nations or people ruled over by an emperor or other powerful sovereign or government, usually a territory of greater extent than a kingdom." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empire)

Some that were clearly multi ethnic were: British (the Island of Britian is made up of 3 nations, plus you have Northern island, and the former commonwealth nations around the world), Austro-Hungarian, etc.

Clearly distinct nations are often born out of these Empires, and former territories with separate cultures, identities, and often languages too. We only need to look back to last century to see some examples after Empires fell: see Iraq (with several nations inside), Yugoslavia, and the former Russian empire after the breakup of the USSR.

Anonymous wrote:

Why don't you read up on the history of American race relations and look at who is in power - in the government, in corporations, at the upper rungs of univeresities, in cultural production - and tell us why? Or will you melt once you realize the extent of what Americans of non-European ancestry have had to put up with over the centuries?

Jewish people? They are overwhelming represented in Forbes 400, Forbes 500 corporations, media and upper echelons of government. They're the most successful demographic in the country rivaled only by the original WASPs, the Episcopalians, due to high intelligence, culture that values success and clannish behavior (WASPs used to do this). Interestingly, you see similar results with overseas Chinese in other Asian countries.

As for your second question, until fairly recent times, White people made up the overwhelming number of immigrants to this country (until 1965) and were about 90% of the population until the 1980's. Of course culture, media, government, etc is going to reflect who the majority of people are in the nation in most circumstances.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When was it ever not OK to be white?

For the last 10 years or so.

Oh noes. Another aggrieved white snowflake. White peoples just don't have enough privilege anymore and PP"s not going to take it anymore.

Whites, who will soon be a minority in this country, have decided that if every other group will use tribal, identity politics, then they will too. If democrats want to make politics totally tribal, then you can't expect republicans and whites not to fight back.

It's interesting you view people seeking rights and to be treat as equal humans as an attack.

Equal rights and "putting my group first" are two different things.

If you look at a policy or government expenditure first as "is this good for my group first" that has nothing to do with equality. If you want equality in front of the law, or equal treatment by the government I think many will stand together for it.

History shows that multi-ethnic empires rarely last long.

Bingo. It's so rediculous to claim that diversity is a "strength." It's one greatest weakness and why we will eventually be surpassed by China. It's a source of constant racial tensions, tribal politics, and discord.

History shows any great power doesn't last long. It has nothing to do with multi-culturalism, and everything to do with the fact that great powers just die out because they become lax, while others continue to strive.

When people start agitating for x group first rather than the country as a whole it leads to breakup.

Look at Spain, Italy, and Scotland, all of which have groups or entire nations with separate identities (and in some cases languages) that agitate for independence.

That means Trumpsters and Trumplandia will be the downfall of the US.

Last I checked, Scotland is still part of the UK. Catalonia is still part of Spain. Sure, there are those who want to secede, but it hasn't happened yet. Will it ever? Who knows. And last I checked, a part of the US wanted to secede too. It had nothing to do with "multi-culturalism" then.

And Italy? You are going to bring up the Roman Empire? You seriously cannot be comparing the Roman empire to the US.

You need a check up because your info is out of date.

Yep, two recent votes in italy: Venato and Lombardy.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/oct/23/northern-italy-regions-overwhelmingly-vote-for-greater-autonomy

It doesn't matter if they are successful, the fact is that all of these regions put their local identity above that of their citizenship.

yes.. which is why the Southern states voted to secede as well. It has zero to do with multi-culturalism as the ^^pp stated and everything to do with wanting local control.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
You deny that democrats have been beating the drum of tribalism for 40 years? Below is a list of "People" pages listed on the DNC's site. Where do whites fit in to the Democratic Party? Or Irish or English or Italians for that matter?

"PEOPLE
African Americans
Americans with Disabilities
American Jewish Community
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
Democrats Abroad
Ethnic Americans
Faith Community
Hispanics
LGBT Community
Native Americans
Rural Americans
Seniors and Retirees
Small Business Community
Union Members and Families
Veterans and Military Families
Women
Young People And Students"

DP... are you seriously stupid?

Why are the other ethnicities listed but European Americans are forbidden from having an identity?

This is why some people say white people are clueless. Look at the list. These are all small groups and/or under represented groups in business as well as in government. DNC is trying to bring a voice to these under represented groups. White people as a whole are NOT under represented in either business or government. They are not excluding white people as a whole. They are represented in the bolded groups.

And white people are not "forbidden" to have an identity. It's not against the law to display your Irish/British/Italian flag. I've seen plenty of them waving around, displayed on cars, homes... whatever. What is frowned upon by most people is being part of a group that hates non white people and/or wants to kick them out/stop them from immigrating/cleave a part of the US for only white people (ie, white nationalists).

So whites are only allowed to celebrate their ethnicity but not their race? By this logic, shouldn't blacks be limited to celebrating their Congo/Chad/Nigerian ancestry?

Oh, do most black Americans whose ancestors came here before 1860 know the ethnic background of their African ancestors who were forced to come here as slaves? Do most African Americans have last names that refer back to their ethnic background? Please tell us, how will most black Americans be able to pinpoint their Congo/Chad/Nigerian ancestry? Are you suggesting the US government pay for DNA tests or pay to do geneological research on all all American slaves, so that their descendants can know what their origins are?

Most black Americans have a good chunk of European ancestry in their DNA.

and apparently many whites in the south have African ancestry.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
You deny that democrats have been beating the drum of tribalism for 40 years? Below is a list of "People" pages listed on the DNC's site. Where do whites fit in to the Democratic Party? Or Irish or English or Italians for that matter?

"PEOPLE
African Americans
Americans with Disabilities
American Jewish Community
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
Democrats Abroad
Ethnic Americans
Faith Community
Hispanics
LGBT Community
Native Americans
Rural Americans
Seniors and Retirees
Small Business Community
Union Members and Families
Veterans and Military Families
Women
Young People And Students"

DP... are you seriously stupid?

Why are the other ethnicities listed but European Americans are forbidden from having an identity?

This is why some people say white people are clueless. Look at the list. These are all small groups and/or under represented groups in business as well as in government. DNC is trying to bring a voice to these under represented groups. White people as a whole are NOT under represented in either business or government. They are not excluding white people as a whole. They are represented in the bolded groups.

And white people are not "forbidden" to have an identity. It's not against the law to display your Irish/British/Italian flag. I've seen plenty of them waving around, displayed on cars, homes... whatever. What is frowned upon by most people is being part of a group that hates non white people and/or wants to kick them out/stop them from immigrating/cleave a part of the US for only white people (ie, white nationalists).

So whites are only allowed to celebrate their ethnicity but not their race? By this logic, shouldn't blacks be limited to celebrating their Congo/Chad/Nigerian ancestry?

Oh, do most black Americans whose ancestors came here before 1860 know the ethnic background of their African ancestors who were forced to come here as slaves? Do most African Americans have last names that refer back to their ethnic background? Please tell us, how will most black Americans be able to pinpoint their Congo/Chad/Nigerian ancestry? Are you suggesting the US government pay for DNA tests or pay to do geneological research on all all American slaves, so that their descendants can know what their origins are?

Most black Americans have a good chunk of European ancestry in their DNA.