Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Nice work? Now the only thing remembered about the women's march is pink
pussy hats and vagina costumes?
I prefer the women's marches that got suffrage for women, created laws to end racial and workplace discrimination and gave women equal
opportunities in the labor force.
Don't forget the boomers that broke into all male colleges and occupations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^The presidency is decided by the electoral college and that is what the constitution requires. If you don't like it, then change the constitution.
Whining about it after the event is pathetic. Since GWB became president despite losing the popular vote and now with what happened in 2016, has there been any concerted move to change the constitution? Not that I know of ...... all we have are pathetic marches with women dressing up as vaginas - white vaginas of course!
If you don't like the electoral college system then take steps to try and change it.
Groan. The idiot poster fixated on "dressed as vaginas" again. You know you sound like an idiot every time you say that, right? If not, you do now.
Don't worry sweetie you can recycle your white vagina costume for Halloween. And pink pussy hats. Very popular in upper northwest Bethesda and Arlington
How long has it been? Nine months since the Women's March and you're still talking about it. Sounds like it was VERY EFFECTIVE. Nice work, ladies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This remains a challenge for the Democrats: how to be tolerant and accepting of immigrants who form a key part of their support but not to alienate most of middle America who are white and still represent the majority of the voters.
Well, for starters, you don't call anyone who disagrees with you "deplorable".
Oh, please - that is the one thing Hillary was 100% correct about. If you can't see that the trump administration is truly deplorable than you are beyond hope.
OK, so that's why you lost. So stop crying about it. It felt good to you when she said it and you got exactly what you deserved: a slaughter.
3 million votes
3 million votes will get you hikes in Chappaqua and the opportunity to whine about how you lost because of Putin and Comey!
Then shame on our democratic process. Because that's crap. And stuff it with all the soul searching about "why did Hillary lose?" She lost by 80,000 votes in the EC - that's how.
She lost because a bunch of whimpy white guys who can't change with the times voted against their own best interests and bought the con that Donald Trump was selling them - that he'd somehow bring them gold and riches and their coal mining jobs back. That's why she lost. She lost because 80,000 voters couldn't see past a flawed woman and instead embraced a man with a solid track record of bigotry, misogyny, and corruption. That's why she lost. Clinton wasn't perfect. But in this case 80,000 Americans didn't like "imperfect woman" and instead voted for deeply incompetent bigot.
Bite off your nose to spite your face and you deserve what you get. How are those tax cuts working for you middle and working class America? What about that "bigger and better healthcare?" How about all that spending on infrastruture and those coal mining jobs?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really was horrible that Hillary set such a bad example by calling people with different political opinions "deplorable." Now she's got half of the liberal sheep doing the same thing. They think it's smart to double down on the behavior that cost them the election. So stupid.
Please provide the full quote, in context, in which HRC characterized all of Trump's voters as "deplorable."
Still waiting.
....."you could put half the Trump supporters into a basket of deplorables," and then she went on to accuse that half of being racists, homophobes, xenophobes, Islamophobes, you name it.
Twist it around however you want to try and excuse that, but that idiotic moment was just another example of her bad judgment. (Running up the popular vote in CA and bypassing swing states was another.)
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/11/us/politics/hillary-clinton-basket-of-deplorables.html
You people really are physiologically incapable of being honest, aren't you?
http://time.com/4486502/hillary-clinton-basket-of-deplorables-transcript/
(bold added for clarity)
"You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?
The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic -- you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people -- now how 11 million. He tweets and retweets their offensive hateful mean-spirited rhetoric. Now, some of those folks -- they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not America. But the other basket ... are people who feel that the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures, and they're just desperate for change. It doesn't really even matter where it comes from. They don't buy everything he says, but he seems to hold out some hope that their lives will be different. They won't wake up and see their jobs disappear, lose a kid to heroine, feel like they're in a dead-end. Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well."
I KNEW you would try to defend her remarks. Twist it however you want, but she said generally speaking, you could put HALF the Trump supporters into a basket of deplorables. Then she went on to talk about the other half, who feel that nobody care a out them. But she still called HALF of Trump supporters racists, sexists, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophic - you name it.
Anonymous wrote:Whatever Democrats did wrong - Hillary, Bernie, Wasserman-Schults, et al - we cannot do again.
trump is actually so much worse than I feared he would be. We Democrats f*cked up big time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really was horrible that Hillary set such a bad example by calling people with different political opinions "deplorable." Now she's got half of the liberal sheep doing the same thing. They think it's smart to double down on the behavior that cost them the election. So stupid.
Please provide the full quote, in context, in which HRC characterized all of Trump's voters as "deplorable."
Still waiting.
....."you could put half the Trump supporters into a basket of deplorables," and then she went on to accuse that half of being racists, homophobes, xenophobes, Islamophobes, you name it.
Twist it around however you want to try and excuse that, but that idiotic moment was just another example of her bad judgment. (Running up the popular vote in CA and bypassing swing states was another.)
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/11/us/politics/hillary-clinton-basket-of-deplorables.html
You people really are physiologically incapable of being honest, aren't you?
http://time.com/4486502/hillary-clinton-basket-of-deplorables-transcript/
(bold added for clarity)
"You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?
The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic -- you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people -- now how 11 million. He tweets and retweets their offensive hateful mean-spirited rhetoric. Now, some of those folks -- they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not America. But the other basket ... are people who feel that the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures, and they're just desperate for change. It doesn't really even matter where it comes from. They don't buy everything he says, but he seems to hold out some hope that their lives will be different. They won't wake up and see their jobs disappear, lose a kid to heroine, feel like they're in a dead-end. Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really was horrible that Hillary set such a bad example by calling people with different political opinions "deplorable." Now she's got half of the liberal sheep doing the same thing. They think it's smart to double down on the behavior that cost them the election. So stupid.
Please provide the full quote, in context, in which HRC characterized all of Trump's voters as "deplorable."
Still waiting.
....."you could put half the Trump supporters into a basket of deplorables," and then she went on to accuse that half of being racists, homophobes, xenophobes, Islamophobes, you name it.
Twist it around however you want to try and excuse that, but that idiotic moment was just another example of her bad judgment. (Running up the popular vote in CA and bypassing swing states was another.)
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/11/us/politics/hillary-clinton-basket-of-deplorables.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really was horrible that Hillary set such a bad example by calling people with different political opinions "deplorable." Now she's got half of the liberal sheep doing the same thing. They think it's smart to double down on the behavior that cost them the election. So stupid.
Please provide the full quote, in context, in which HRC characterized all of Trump's voters as "deplorable."
Still waiting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really was horrible that Hillary set such a bad example by calling people with different political opinions "deplorable." Now she's got half of the liberal sheep doing the same thing. They think it's smart to double down on the behavior that cost them the election. So stupid.
Please provide the full quote, in context, in which HRC characterized all of Trump's voters as "deplorable."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^The presidency is decided by the electoral college and that is what the constitution requires. If you don't like it, then change the constitution.
Whining about it after the event is pathetic. Since GWB became president despite losing the popular vote and now with what happened in 2016, has there been any concerted move to change the constitution? Not that I know of ...... all we have are pathetic marches with women dressing up as vaginas - white vaginas of course!
If you don't like the electoral college system then take steps to try and change it.
Groan. The idiot poster fixated on "dressed as vaginas" again. You know you sound like an idiot every time you say that, right? If not, you do now.
Don't worry sweetie you can recycle your white vagina costume for Halloween. And pink pussy hats. Very popular in upper northwest Bethesda and Arlington
These are the liberals who claim that Trump voters are uneducated and ignorant. Those costumes have me convinced!![]()
Clearly liberal intelligentsia on display here:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Hey look! Even the older ladies are getting in on the action. Take note, DOTARDS!!
![]()
I promise you, no one and I mean no one, has touched that old broad's vagina in a hundred years. No one.