Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/352959-price-to-reimburse-taxpayers-for-cost-of-charter-jets
I'm trying to parse out Tom Price's statement that he will reimburse taxpayers for "his seat" on the charter jets. I'm guessing he had at least 10 people with him for each trip. So instead of paying the $300K that his choices to travel on the private plane cost, he'll end up reimbursing the US Government $30K? That's being really cheap given that the other 9 people could have flown commercial were it not for his expensive tastes.
I love the statement that he's "taking the unprecedented step of reimbursing the government." Forgetting that the unprecedented step was the private jet for government business.
And these are only the unprecedented steps we know about. He's obviously comfortable bilking the taxpayers he works for. Personal net worth of $8 million and all that.
He's not actually reimbursing for the flights, just a seat on the plane at business class rates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/352959-price-to-reimburse-taxpayers-for-cost-of-charter-jets
I'm trying to parse out Tom Price's statement that he will reimburse taxpayers for "his seat" on the charter jets. I'm guessing he had at least 10 people with him for each trip. So instead of paying the $300K that his choices to travel on the private plane cost, he'll end up reimbursing the US Government $30K? That's being really cheap given that the other 9 people could have flown commercial were it not for his expensive tastes.
I love the statement that he's "taking the unprecedented step of reimbursing the government." Forgetting that the unprecedented step was the private jet for government business.
And these are only the unprecedented steps we know about. He's obviously comfortable bilking the taxpayers he works for. Personal net worth of $8 million and all that.
Anonymous wrote:It's up to $1M now. This guy sure knows how to enjoy our money!!
Anonymous wrote:Hey Republicans! You know those "elitists" you are always talking about? This is what actual elitists look like. Don't even know it's wrong to charter planes on the government's dime.
Anonymous wrote:Do you remember that scandalous GSA conference back in 2010 where the GSA spent $800,000 for a lavish conference for hundreds of GSA employees. The people who organized that conference got into trouble as they should have and Congress decided that they would cut back on government travel expenditures. This was well-intentioned but it also made it difficult for govt workers to attend professional and academic conferences. The impact on govt researchers in particular was very deleterious.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clampdown-after-gsa-scandal-puts-some-federal-workers-in-a-pinch/2015/02/08/d8217240-a5a4-11e4-a7c2-03d37af98440_story.html?utm_term=.beb3a56c431e
Then there was the sequester and govt budget cuts which further cut travel budgets. I remember reading stories about FBI field agents having to buy their own gas.
It is so egregious to think that Sec. Price can get away with this without any major consequences. I bet if he was still in Congress he would be pillorying a govt worker who did somedthing similar.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In a normal administration, he would be fired. I can't believe he's only paying back a fraction of the plane costs.
In a normal administration he would never have taken private planes on the taxpayer's dime just to have lunch with his son.
Anonymous wrote:In a normal administration, he would be fired. I can't believe he's only paying back a fraction of the plane costs.
Anonymous wrote:Do you remember that scandalous GSA conference back in 2010 where the GSA spent $800,000 for a lavish conference for hundreds of GSA employees. The people who organized that conference got into trouble as they should have and Congress decided that they would cut back on government travel expenditures. This was well-intentioned but it also made it difficult for govt workers to attend professional and academic conferences. The impact on govt researchers in particular was very deleterious.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clampdown-after-gsa-scandal-puts-some-federal-workers-in-a-pinch/2015/02/08/d8217240-a5a4-11e4-a7c2-03d37af98440_story.html?utm_term=.beb3a56c431e
Then there was the sequester and govt budget cuts which further cut travel budgets. I remember reading stories about FBI field agents having to buy their own gas.
It is so egregious to think that Sec. Price can get away with this without any major consequences. I bet if he was still in Congress he would be pillorying a govt worker who did something similar.
Anonymous wrote:http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/352959-price-to-reimburse-taxpayers-for-cost-of-charter-jets
I'm trying to parse out Tom Price's statement that he will reimburse taxpayers for "his seat" on the charter jets. I'm guessing he had at least 10 people with him for each trip. So instead of paying the $300K that his choices to travel on the private plane cost, he'll end up reimbursing the US Government $30K? That's being really cheap given that the other 9 people could have flown commercial were it not for his expensive tastes.